Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501473
Original file (ND0501473.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-SR, USN
Docket No. ND05-01473

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20050908. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

 Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20060614. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“I am requesting a upgrade of my discharge so that I may have access to military benefits and GI Bill to further my education.”
Documentation
Only the service and medical records were reviewed. The Applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board’s consideration.

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: None
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 19950525             Date of Discharge: 19980204

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 08 10 (Does not exclude lost time)
         Inactive: 00 03 26

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: 12 days
         Confinement:              3 days

 Age at Entry: 18

Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 40

 Highest Rate: SN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.3 (3)              Behavior: 2.6 (3)                 OTA: 3 .11

Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214): * DD Form 214 not contained in the record.


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-142.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

950921:  Commenced active duty for a period of 3 years.

960416:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Violation of the UCMJ, specifically chronic unauthorized absence), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.
970523:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Absence without leave.
         Violation of the UCMJ, Article 92: Failure to obey an order or regulation.
 Award: $505.00 pay per month for 2 months (suspended for 6 months), reduction to E-2 (suspended for 6 months); restriction and extra duties for 45 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
971230:  Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0800 on 971230.

 980112:  Applicant from unauthorized absence at 0645 on 980112 (12 days/surrendered).
980116:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Violation of the UCMJ, specifically Article 86-absence without leave and substandard uniform appearance.), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.
980116:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (3 specs): Absence without leave.
         Award: Forfeiture of $505.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-2. No indication of appeal in the record.

980123:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92 (9 specs): Failure to obey order or regulation.
 Award: Confinement for 3 days, forfeiture of $450.00 pay per month for 2 months (suspended for 6 months), reduction to E-1 (suspended for 6 months). No indication of appeal in the record.
 .



980128:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: (3 specs).
         Violation of the UCMJ, Article 117: (2 specs).
 Award: Confinement for 3 days, forfeiture of $450.00 pay per month for 2 months. No indication of appeal in the record.
980128:  Forfeiture of pay and reduction in rate awarded at NJP on 980123 vacated due to continued misconduct.

980128:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct as evidenced by four non-judicial punishments and violating two NAVPERS 1070/613 counseling/warning entries in your current enlistment; and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense as evidence by CO’s NJP 97 May 23 violation of the UCMJ, Article 92 (Failure to obey an order or regulation), CO’s NJP 98 Jan 23 violation of the UCMJ, Article 92 (Failure to obey an order or regulation), CO’s NJP 98 Jan 28 violation of the UCMJ, Article 92, 117 (Failure to obey an order or regulation and provoking speeches and gestures).
980128:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
980128:  Commanding Officer, USS GUNSTON HALL (LSD 44) recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct as evidenced by four non-judicial punishments and violating two NAVPERS 1070/613 counseling/warning entries in your current enlistment; and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense as evidence by CO’s NJP 97 May 23 violation of the UCMJ, Article 92 (Failure to obey an order or regulation), CO’s NJP 98 Jan 23 violation of the UCMJ, Article 92 (Failure to obey an order or regulation), and CO’s NJP 98 Jan 28 violation of the UCMJ, Article 92 (Failure to obey an order or regulation). Commanding Officer’s comments: “Per reference (a) article 3630600 and 3630605 processing for administrative discharge is warranted. I recommend that a characterization of Other Than Honorable be given due to the amount and nature of the offenses. Every effort has been taken to correct his deficiencies, but SR D_ (Applicant) shows no desire to conform with the basic standards of the Navy. SR D_(Applicant) has waived his rights to an administrative board and understands the severity of this characterization. His evaluations outlined in enclosure (3) show him as a below average Sailor who possesses no potential in the Naval Service and his conduct is unacceptable and brings discredit upon the Naval Service.”

980203:  GCMCA, Commander, Amphibious Group TWO directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense.

         Service Record is missing elements of information (DD Form 214).

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 19980204 with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C).

 When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service, was marred by 4 nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violations of Articles 86 (4 specs of UA), 92 (12 specs of failure to obey an order or regulation) and 117 (provoking speech or gestures). Violations of UCMJ Articles 92 and 117 are considered serious offenses. In addition, the Applicant received 2 retention warning and had a suspended NJP award vacated due to continued misconduct. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination on the propriety and equity of the discharge.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.









Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs .


PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00034

    Original file (MD01-00034.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I am requesting that my discharge be upgraded from a General Discharge to a Honorable Discharge. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 950118 - 950807 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 950808 Date of Discharge: 990807 Length of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00512

    Original file (ND00-00512.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00512 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000404, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copies of DD Form 214 (2) Rebuttal for Separation Recommendation to Commanding Officer of Submarine Group 2 (2pgs) Letter from Applicant (2pgs) Copies of Commanding Officer's Messages...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-01065

    Original file (MD00-01065.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-01065 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000918, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions or entry level separation or uncharacterized. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. [Misconduct, for breaking restrictions and being UA on two occasions for sign in while on restricted status] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00131

    Original file (ND02-00131.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00131 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 011018, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Applicant's letter to the Board dtd 01AUG06 Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00176

    Original file (ND01-00176.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00176 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001127, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION 920707: Vacate suspended forfeiture of $183.00 and restriction for 14 days awarded at CO's NJP dated 23Mar92.920707: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 117: Wrongfully using provoking words on 18May92.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01114

    Original file (ND02-01114.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-01114 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020805, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. ), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.971210: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Failure to obey order or regulation on 971205. Verifiable proof of any post-service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500300

    Original file (ND0500300.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). 020206: Applicant completed two weeks of outpatient alcohol rehabilitation treatment at SARD aboard USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN (CVN 72).Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (CO’s NJP of 020201 for VUCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence (3 specs); Article 91, disrespect in language; Article 134, drunk and disorderly. The names, and votes of the members...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01178

    Original file (ND01-01178.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. No indication of appeal in the record.950511: Applicant to unauthorized absence 0715, 11May95.950509: USS SAVANNAH (AOR 4) notified applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense.950510: Applicant advised of his rights and having...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600303

    Original file (ND0600303.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). While the Board acknowledges the Applicant’s testimony, the Applicant failed to provide any post-service documentation for the Board to consider. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00419

    Original file (ND99-00419.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    980129: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from unit 0720, 980116 to 1020, 980116. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 980706 with a general under honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A). There was nothing in the records, nor did the applicant provide any documentation, to indicate there existed an error of fact, law, procedure, or discretion at the time of discharge.