Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501438
Original file (ND0501438.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-ABFAR, USN
Docket No. ND05-01438

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20050830. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20060512. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“I A_ S. G_ (Applicant) am respectfully requesting a change to my discharge to a Honorable due to the fact that I would greatly like to enlist back into the military I would like to go ARMY to full fill my duties as an American. I am married now and have 2 children. I was young and made bad decisions and now I realize how much it affected me and I would like fix what I can for the future of my family and my country.”

 Documentation
Only the service and medical record were reviewed. The Applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board’s consideration.

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     20000727 – 20000815               COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 20000816             Date of Discharge: 20020930

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 11 03 (Does not include lost time.)
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: 77 days
         Confinement:              45 days

 Age at Entry: 20

 Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: (Not contained in available record)                       AFQT: 40

 Highest Rate: ABFAA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 2.5 (2)              Behavior: 1.0 (2)                          OTA: 1 .91

Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214): Battle Efficiency Award, Sea Service Deployment Ribbon, National Defense Service Medal.


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/ MISCONDUCT, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly 3630620 .
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

010112:  Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0600 on 010112.

 010312:  Applicant from unauthorized absence at 1150 on 010312 (59 days/surrendered).

 010314:  Summary Court-Martial.
         Charge: violation of the UCMJ, Article 86:
         Specification: Unauthorized absence from 01Jan13 – 01Mar12
          Finding: to Charge and the specification thereunder, guilty.
          Sentence: Forfeiture of $521.00 pay per month for 1 month, and confinement for 15 days.
         CA action 010323: Sentence approved and ordered executed.
010823:  Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0600 on 010823.

 010901:  Applicant from unauthorized absence at 0600 on 010901 (9 days/surrendered).

 010906:  Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0600 on 010906.

 010911:  Applicant from unauthorized absence at 1150 on 010911 (9 days/surrendered).

 010926:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (3 Specs):
         Award: Forfeiture of $521.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-1. No indication of appeal in the record.

010926:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (NJP on 26 Sept. 2001, for violation of the UCMJ, Art 86 UA (3 Specs).), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

 011005:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92:
         Specification: Violation of general order or regulation (possessing alcoholic beverage).
         Award: Confinement to 3 days of bread and water.

020403:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Violation of the UCMJ, Article 134 – knowingly receiving stolen property. On 16 March 2002, you knowingly received stolen property from the dental department, to wit: lidocaine vials.), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.
020705:  Applicant to unauthorized absence at 1400 on 020717.

 020717:  Applicant from unauthorized absence at 0600 on 020717 (12 days/surrendered).
020718:  Summary Court-Martial.
         Charge: violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 and 112a:
         Specification: Unauthorized absence and Wrongful use of a controlled substance.
          Finding: to Charge and the specification thereunder, guilty.
          Sentence: Forfeiture of $770.00 pay per month for 1 month, and confinement for 30 days.
         CA action 010718: Sentence approved and ordered executed.

020930:  Form DD214 discharging the Applicant from military service.


Service Record did not contain the Administrative Discharge package.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 20020930 by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B) with a service characterization under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (E).

 The Applicant bears the burden of establishing his issues through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, that the discharge was not proper and equitable. The Board presumed the Applicant was notified of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, advised of his rights, provided the opportunity to consult with counsel, and elected or waive d each right . The Board presumed that the Commanding Officer, USS Bataan , recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse . Relief denied.
There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Mandatory processing for separation is required for sailors who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.

The Applicant contends his disciplinary problems were the result of his youth. The NDRB recognizes that serving in the U.S. Navy is challenging. Our country is fortunate to have men and women willing to endure the hardships and sacrifices required in order to serve their country. It must be noted that most members of the Navy serve honorably and therefore earn their honorable discharges. In fairness to those members of the Navy, commanders and separation authorities are tasked to ensure that undeserving Sailors receive no higher characterization than is due. The NDRB found that the Applicant's service was equitably characterized. Relief denied.

The Applicant states that he is requesting an upgrade of his discharge so he can enlist in the Army. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 Aug 2002 until Present, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.
B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 – unauthorized absence, Article 92 – failure to obey a general order, Article 134 – receiving stolen property, and Article 112a – wrongful use of a controlled substance.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

 E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00280

    Original file (ND02-00280.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    My leave started Sept 20, 00 ending Oct 6, 00. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's DD Form 214 Two pages from Applicant's service record not previously available to the board. ]011019: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use) authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146.The Applicant’s Discharge Package is...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500655

    Original file (ND0500655.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND05-00655 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050304. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits not the Naval Discharge Review Board.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00926

    Original file (MD03-00926.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. CHARGE II: This charge is faulty because it is based upon the premise that an order was issued. Respectfully,” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Three pages from Applicant’s service record Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4) Appointment of Veterans...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500628

    Original file (ND0500628.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant contends that his military service aboard the USS AMERICA (CV 66), during which time he received numerous awards, is deserving of an honorable discharge. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501342

    Original file (ND0501342.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “RE Code.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. Documentation In addition to the service and medical records, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Leave request/authorization, dtd December 6, 2001 Applicant’s DD Form 214 JUMPS LES Online Inquiry,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00830

    Original file (MD04-00830.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 010726 - 010910 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 010911 Date of Discharge: 020823 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 00 11 12 (Does not include lost time.) Reenlistment policy of the Marine...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00213

    Original file (ND01-00213.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Two pages from applicant's service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 971125 - 980126 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 980127 Date of Discharge: 981119 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 00 09 24 Inactive: None The applicant...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01208

    Original file (ND03-01208.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 000320 - 000522 COG Active: USN None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 000523 Date of Discharge:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00068

    Original file (ND01-00068.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Letter from applicant dated October 2, 2000 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 880506 - 880925 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 880926 Date of Discharge: 910702 Length of Service (years, months, days): Active: 02 09 07 Inactive: None Age at Entry:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501248

    Original file (ND0501248.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I was in the Navy less then 180 days. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Ltr from Applicant, dtd July 05, 2005 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR 20010421 – 20010523 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 20010524 Date of Discharge: 20011030 Length of Service (years,...