Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501062
Original file (ND0501062.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-AOAA, USN
Docket No. ND05-01062

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20050606. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to uncharacterized. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

 Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20051117. After a thorough review of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense .

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“Respectfully request change in discharge for the purpose of reenlisting and applying for the honorable navy seals.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Only the service record was reviewed. The Applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board’s consideration.

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     19990930 – 20000814               COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 20000815             Date of Discharge: 20020215

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 06 01
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: none
         Confinement:              none

 Age at Entry: 18

Years Contracted: 4 (12 month extension)

 Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 43

 Highest Rate: AOAA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NA*                  Behavior:        NA*               OTA: NA*

 Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214): None

* Not Available


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-142 (formerly 3630605).

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

011105:  Applicant UA and in the hand civil authorities.

020114:  Applicant pleaded guilty to, and was found guilty of, two counts of abduction and robbery on 011104 at Circuit Court of City of Virginia Beach. (Date of final judgment entered 020117).

020114:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

020114:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
020130:  Commanding Officer, Airborne Mine Countermeasures Weapon Systems Training School, recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense. Commanding Officer’s comments: “AOAR W_ (Applicant) is unfit to remain on active duty as documented by enclosure (1) through (4) [Administrative Separation Processing Notice-Administrative Board Procedure of 14 January 2002, Court Finding-Virginia: In the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach Case No.:CR01-4711, U.S. Naval Criminal Investigative Service Report of Investigation of 08 November 2001, NAVPERS 1070/606 Record of Unauthorized Absence of 05 November 2001]. His behavior has demonstrated a significant departure from that expected of a military servicemember. I have determined that he has no potential for future productive naval service. Accordingly, I am recommending separating AOAR G_ E. W_ (Applicant) with an Other Than Honorable Discharge.”

020208:  COMNAVAIRLAN Norfolk, VA, directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense.

Service Record was missing elements of the Summary of Service.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 20020215 by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A and B) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (E).

 Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. On 20020114, in civil court, the Applicant pleaded guilty to, and was convicted of, two counts of abduction and one count of robbery. The Applicant’s actions are serious offenses and violations of Articles 122 and 134 of the UCMJ. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy. The Board found the Applicant’s under other than honorable conditions discharge warranted. Relief is not warranted.

The Applicant requests a characterization change so that he can reenlist and become a Navy SEAL. T he Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment, educational opportunities or reenlistment. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have occurred during the discharge process for the period of enlistment in question. The Board discovered no impropriety or inequity after a review of Applicant’s case. However, neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable "RE" code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter. Relief on the basis of this issue is unwarranted.

By regulation, members notified of intended recommendation for discharge within the first 180 days of enlistment are eligible for an uncharacterized or entry-level separation characterization of service unless there were unusual circumstances regarding a servicemember’s performance or conduct that merit another characterization. The Applicant was notified of his Commanding Officer’s intention to separate him after serving 17 months. The Applicant was not eligible for an uncharacterized character of service. Furthermore, the Applicant’s misconduct would have made an uncharacterized character of service inappropriate. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 31, dated 20 Feb 01, effective 25 Jan 01 until 21 Aug 02, Article 1910-142 [formerly 3630605]. SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 122, robbery or Article 134, kidnapping.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs .


PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00255

    Original file (ND02-00255.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. I am requesting to have my re-entry level changed so I may re-enlist in the U.S. Navy thank you for our time. By regulation, members discharged within the first 180 days of enlistment are given characterization of service as “Entry Level Separation.” The applicant served for 10 months and 20 days.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00851

    Original file (ND01-00851.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 890722 - 890807 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 890808 Date of Discharge: 930709 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 03 11 08 Inactive: None 930601: Applicant from unauthorized absence (45...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500776

    Original file (ND0500776.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. While the Applicant may feel that there were mitigating factors to his misconduct, the record does not contain, nor did t he Applicant provide, any evidence to suggest that he was not responsible, or should not be held accountable, for his misconduct. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600082

    Original file (ND0600082.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION On 18 August 2004, AOAA C_ (Applicant) had an Administrative Board in which the board recommended by a vote of 3 to 0 to separate with a characterization of Other Than Honorable suspended for a period of 12 months.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501212

    Original file (ND0501212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Applicable regulations permit commanding officers, in certain types of serious misconduct, even though alleged, to make a determination as to the potential for further naval service for service members under their charge. After a review of the Applicant’s service record and evidence presented to the NDRB from the Trial Order from the Circuit Court of the City of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500648

    Original file (ND0500648.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Issues submitted by Applicant’s counsel/representative (Civilian Counsel):“Whether the characterization of discharge was warranted given the circumstances of the offense charge and considering the entire service member’s exemplary record during the period of his enlistment. The Applicant’s violations of Articles 107, 108 and 121 are...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600927

    Original file (ND0600927.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Elements of Discharge: Discharge Process: Date Notified:20050321Narrative Reason(s): Least Favorable Characterization: Record Supports Narrative Reason: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20050323Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) - NO STATEMENT FOUND IN RECORDBoard Date: NOT APPLICABLEFinding of Administrative Board: Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date): UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00524

    Original file (ND04-00524.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600232

    Original file (ND0600232.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Due to continued misconduct, AOAA J _was again awarded NJP on 020920 for violating my restriction orders. At this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of post service character and conduct to mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00211

    Original file (ND03-00211.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s discharge package was not available to the Board for review. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to: