Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500813
Original file (ND0500813.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-SA, USN
Docket No. ND05-00813

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20050412. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20050819. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.



PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“My discharge was inequitable because it I was targeted specifically by another deck seaman who apparently didn’t like me. I was young and I was hogging around other seaman “the wrong crowd” who was smoking majuana; therefore it got into my system. Now this other seaman was witness to them smoking and assumed we all was smoking pot, but that was not the case. The next day he reported this to our superiors and we were immediately tested. The test came back positive and we were discharge with an other than honorable discharge. I was young and didn’t know any better, growing up I was never around people who smoked cigarettes yet along majuana. At the time I didn’t understand the severity of it’s use or drawbacks. I loved the Navy and wanted to make a career out of it, but due to someone else’s envy I was not given that chance. Since I was discharged for the Navy I have learned the importance of selecting friends with similarly values as yourself if not the same values. I regret ever being affiliated with that bad crowd of people and I never made the same mistake. I have earned a Bachelor’s Degree in Science(Computer Information System) and I have be married for the past four years with two beautiful children. If it is at all possible I would love to upgrade my discharge or maybe even finish serving my country like I had planned so many years ago. Thank you for your time and your consideration.”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Bachelor of Science in Computer Information Systems, DeVry Institute of Technology, dated, March 2, 2001
Certificate of Marriage, County of Cook, State of Illinois, Office of the County Clerk, dated October 31, 2001
Academic Transcript, DeVry Institute of Technology, dated November 09, 2001 (2 pages)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     930309 - 940104  COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 940105               Date of Discharge: 950519

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 04 15
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12+                       AFQT: 47

 Highest Rate: SN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.1 (2)              Behavior: 3.2 (2)                 OTA: 3 .16

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

950420:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use of marijuana on 95APR04.
         Award: Forfeiture of $478.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-2. No indication of appeal in the record.
950421:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by your Commanding Officer’s nonjudicial punishment of 20 April 1995.
950425:  Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with certified counsel, elected to waive all rights. Applicant does not object to separation.

950430:  Medical dependency evaluation found the Applicant not to have a drug problem or an alcohol problem.
         Recommendation: Applicant be retained in the Naval Service, no drug use, recommend retention with periodic testing.
950430:  Commanding Officer, USS RAINER, recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by your Commanding Officer’s Nonjudicial punishment of 20 April 1995. Commanding Officer’s stated that the SNM was awarded NJP on 95APR20 for VUCMJ, Article 112A – Wrongful use of marijuana on 95APR04. His wrongful use of marijuana cannot be tolerated and is detrimental to good order and discipline of this command and the Navy. SNM possesses no potential for further naval service. I strongly recommend that SNM be separated from the naval service with characterization of service as Other Than Honorable.

950510:  BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19950519 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (B and C).

The Applicant contends that although he tested positive on a probable cause urinalysis test; he never smoked marijuana. The Applicant contends that his discharge was inequitable because another seaman aboard the ship targeted him by telling the command that he witnessed the Applicant and others doing drugs.

 There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Mandatory processing for separation is required for sailors who abuse illegal drugs. Serious offenses such as drug abuse warrant separation from the naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. The Applicant’s service record is marred by one nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for violation of UCMJ Article 112a, wrongful use of marijuana, thus substantiating the misconduct for which he was separated. The summary of service clearly documents that misconduct due to drug abuse was the reason the Applicant was discharged. No other Narrative Reason for Separation could more clearly describe why the Applicant was discharged. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.

The applicant contends that he was young and made some mistakes in judgment. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have occurred during the discharge process for the period of enlistment in question. The Board discovered no impropriety after a review of Applicant’s case. There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded, based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. The NDRB reviewed the Applicant’s post-service documentation that included, a copy of his Bachelor of Science degree in Computer Information Systems from DeVry Institute of Technology, his academic transcript from DeVry Institute of Technology, and his marriage certificate. At this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of post service character and conduct to mitigate the misconduct that resulted in his characterization of discharge. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, evidence of drug free existence, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities, in order for consideration for clemency based on post-service conduct. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9/94, effective
22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501219

    Original file (ND0501219.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. No indication of appeal in the record.041221: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146.Service Record did not contain the Administrative Discharge package. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post-service documentation for the Board to consider.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00927

    Original file (ND99-00927.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Thank You Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 College course from Central Connecticut State University Copy of Degree Associate in Science dated May 1997 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 930318 - 930621 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 930622 Date of Discharge:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00173

    Original file (ND99-00173.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ]831104: Commanding officer recommended discharge under honorable conditions (general) by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).Commanding officer’s comments (verbatim): EMFN (applicant) has abused drugs which cannot be tolerated in the Navy. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant’s representative submitted the following as issue 1:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600040

    Original file (ND0600040.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND06-00040 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20051004. 990820: Commanding Officer, USS CARL VINSON (CVN 70), recommended the Commander, Carrier Group THREE, that the Applicant be discharged with under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by his nonjudicial punishment imposed on 15 July 1999 for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a. The Applicant is advised that the Veterans Administration determines...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00015

    Original file (ND01-00015.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    861219: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by your nonjudicial punishment fro attempting to smoke marijuana and for the wrongful use of cocaine.861219: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01139

    Original file (ND01-01139.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The applicant’s second issue states that he received good evaluations while working on the flight deck and continued his positive service after his NJP’s. The applicant’s fourth issue states that it was not the Navy’s policy to discharge members for a positive urinalysis.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00813

    Original file (ND04-00813.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’ s DD Form 214 (Member 4) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 010117 - 010715 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 010716 Date of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00298

    Original file (ND01-00298.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In response to the applicant’s issue, the Board found that the applicant's age, education level, and test scores qualified him for enlistment. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A), Change 6, effective 11 Jan 89 until 13 Jun 90,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500782

    Original file (ND0500782.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AR Z_ (Applicant) commenced two separate periods of unauthorized absence for 19 days and 29 days. T he Board thoroughly reviewed the Applicant's service records, to include the record of his separation proceedings, to determine if his discharge was equitable. The Applicant further contends that he was never in any trouble prior to his going UA and that he had a good service record, including awards, prior to this time.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00528

    Original file (ND00-00528.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 831116: Applicant briefed on Navy's policy on drugs and alcohol abuse.840820: Counseling: Advised of deficiency (Alcohol abuse-first incident).840822: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 134 (2 specs): Drunk and disorderly. Impression: Alcohol: Has been alcohol abuse, not a problem drinker, is an alcohol abuser, is not psychologically or physically dependent/addicted to alcohol.850716: Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the applicant...