Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500487
Original file (ND0500487.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-SMSA, USN
Docket No. ND05-00487

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20050131. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general (under honorable conditions). The Applicant requests a documentary record review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20050511. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “Respectfully request upgrade to honorable conditions, to allow reenlistment to U.S. Navy and to be able to make things right to my country and to myself. I have been a civilian for ten years and have regretted my actions for just as long. I was naive to what I was doing and my decision was based upon reasons that shouldn’t have ever existed. My first enlistment was honorable conditions as was my second up until a few months before leaving the service. I would like to reenlist to active duty.”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     880929 - 890710  COG
         Active: USN                        890711 - 930512  HON

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 930513               Date of Discharge: 950104

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 07 22
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 21                          Years Contracted: 4*

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 36/46

 Highest Rate: SM3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.60 (4)             Behavior: 3.45 (4)                OTA: 3.65

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NUC, KLM, GCM, SASM with 2 Bronze Stars, SSDR (3), NDSM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

*Applicant’s reenlistment contract was not found in service record. Length of reenlistment extracted from Commanding Officer’s letter dated 941202.

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

930513:  Applicant reenlisted for 4 years.

940526:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 111: Operating a vehicle while under influence of alcohol on 940316.
         Award: Forfeiture of $350 per month for 1 month, reduction to E-3. Reduction suspended for 6 months. No indication of appeal in the record.
940720:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Operated a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol on 2342, 9403l6.), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

941104:  NAVDRUGLAB, San Diego, CA, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 941101, tested positive for amphetamines/methamphetamine.

 941115:  CAAC: Applicant evaluated as non-drug dependent. [Extracted from Commanding Officer’s letter dated 941202.]

941121:  Suspended reduction in rate awarded at Commanding Officer’s NJP of 930526 vacated this date.
941122:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use of a controlled substance on 941031.
         Award: Restriction for 14 days, reduction to E-2. No indication of appeal in the record.
941129:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure, and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense as evidenced by all nonjudicial punishments in your current enlistment and use of controlled substance following completion of Level II rehabilitation treatment program. Applicant notified that if separation is approved, the least favorable characterization of service possible is under other than honorable conditions.
941130:  Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27(b), elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation. The Applicant did not object to the separation.
941202:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure, and misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

941221:  BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19950104 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

Issue 1. Normally, to permit relief, an impropriety or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such impropriety or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member's conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member's military record. T he evidence of record indicates that the Applicant’s service was marred by drunk driving, illegal drug use, and an alcohol rehabilitation failure. This misconduct resulted in two separate nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violations of UCMJ Articles 111 and 112a, both of which constitute a serious offense under applicable regulations. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy. Such conduct falls far short of that expected of a member of the U.S. military and does not meet the requirements for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.
Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9, effective
22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.
B. Under the Manual for Courts-Martial, a punitive discharge is authorized for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 111, drunken or reckless operation of vehicle, aircraft or vessel, and 112a, wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substances, if adjudged at a Special or General Court-Martial.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .


PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500084

    Original file (ND0500084.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600713

    Original file (ND0600713.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I could go back to school and get a proper education.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Proof of Residency from Eagle Recovery Programs & Transition Home, dtd March 16, 2006Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Service 2) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19900720 – 19900725 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01242

    Original file (ND03-01242.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing, also advised that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) does not travel, all hearing are held in the Washington National Capital Region. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00632

    Original file (ND02-00632.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s service record, which included a civil conviction for DUI and two NJP’s for unauthorized absence and drunk and disorderly conduct, the Board discerned there was no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant's service or the assigned reason for discharge at the time of discharge. At this time, the applicant has not provided such documentation for the Board to consider. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00104

    Original file (ND01-00104.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00104 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001030, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant’s first issue states that his discharge was inequitable since it was based on “two isolated incidents, neither of which were...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00868

    Original file (ND04-00868.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (2) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19900628 - 19900912 COG Active: None Period of Service Under...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501323

    Original file (ND0501323.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR 19900807 – 19901211 COG Active: USN 19901212 – 19920721 HON Period of Service Under Review :Date of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500397

    Original file (ND0500397.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANTIf you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00524

    Original file (ND04-00524.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00421

    Original file (ND00-00421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION No indication of appeal in the record.940502: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by all drug incidents in your current enlistment and the commission of a serious offenses as evidenced by your violation of the UCMJ, Article 92 by drinking alcoholic beverages while under the age of 21 and violation of the UCMJ, Article 111 drunk...