Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500473
Original file (ND0500473.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-SM2, USN
Docket No. ND05-00473

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20050126. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant listed civilian counsel as the representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20050811. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-152 (formerly Article 3630550).


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Issues submitted by Applicant’s civilian counsel :
“1. The applicant was not properly processed for discharge having received notice of retention in the Navy just 33 days prior to discharge.”

“2. Assuming arguendo that the applicant was properly processed for discharge, the applicable character of discharge should have been Honorable.”

“3. The positive aspects of the applicant’s overall service outweigh any minor negative factor.”

“4. The significant post-service accomplishments of the applicant’s service in Iraq, as a US contract employee under wartime conditions, merits a fully Honorable discharge.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214
Legal Brief (11 pages)
History of Assignment Documents (2 pages)
Colorado Bureau of Investigation Criminal Record Letter, dated August 13, 2004
Letter of Recommendation from LT C_S. I_, USN dated October 31, 2004
Reference Letter from S_ S_, dated September 17, 2004 (2 pages)
Reference Letter from A_ H_, dated October 24, 2004 (2 pages)
Reference Letter from E_ M_, dated October 26, 2004 (2 pages)
Reference Letter from B_ M. W_, October 3, 2004
Oath of Office from B_ W_.

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     921219 - 930823  COG
 Active: USN                        930824 - 970410  HON
Active: USN                        970411 - 010405  HON
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 010406               Date of Discharge: 030709

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 03 03
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 25                          Years Contracted: 6

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 53

 Highest Rate: SM2

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 4.25 (4)             Behavior: 2.75 (4)                OTA: 3 .60

 Military Decorations: Enlisted Surface Warfare Specialist, NSW Breast Insignia (Trident), Navy and Marine Corp Parachutist Badge (Gold Wing).

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Navy Good Conduct Medal, Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, National Defense Service Medal (2), Navy Rifle Expert Medal, Navy Pistol Expert Medal, Letter of Commendation (Flag).

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/ ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-152 (formerly Article 3630550).
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

010406:  Reenlisted at NSWU 1 GUAM for 6 years.
011005:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Refusal to submit to law enforcement administered blood alcohol testing and in subsequent screening, the Counseling and Assistance Center, USNH Guam, has determined that the Applicant alcohol dependent.), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.
030606:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (a. Guilty of Art 107, making a False Official Statement, b. Guilty of Art 92, Failure to Obey a Lawful General Order, c. In October 01, the Counseling and Assistance Center, USNH Guam determined that the Applicant was alcohol dependent, ordered him to complete treatment which he failed to do.) Applicant ordered to complete ASAM Level 2 intensive outpatient treatment for alcohol dependence, have a physical exam within 30 days of attending treatment, and attend 3 AA meetings per week until treatment is complete, notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

030613:  Pre-treatment Medical Assessment (SARP) indicates previous history ETOH Dependence; completed Level II.

 030709:  DD-214: Applicant discharged with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure, authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-152.

Service Record did not contain the Administrative Discharge package.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20030709 with a general (under honorable conditions) due to alcohol rehabilitation failure (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

The Applicant, through counsel, contends that he was not properly processed for discharge because he received a notice of retention in the Navy just 33 days prior to discharge. A Page 13 counseling/retention warning is legally binding on the Navy. A servicemember cannot be processed for separation after the issuance of such a warning unless the underlying misconduct is an offense that requires mandatory administrative processing (e.g. drug related offense or sexual misconduct) or the Applicant violates the retention warning through continued misconduct. The evidence of record indicates that the Applicant received a Page 13 counseling/retention warning on 20030606. On 20030709 the Applicant was discharged by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure with a general (under honorable conditions discharge). The record contains no evidence of subsequent misconduct by the Applicant or any violation of the retention warning. In such cases where there is a dearth of evidence, the Board generally applies the presumption of regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs. This presumption permits the Board to presume that the government’s agents acted in good faith, proceeded within the bounds of the law, and conformed their behavior to appropriate standards during the Applicant’s Naval service and subsequent administrative processing. As such, the Board presumes that the Navy acted in accordance with applicable regulation and only initiated separation proceedings after the Applicant somehow violated his retention warning. The Board draws support for this position from the Applicant’s DD-214. The Applicant’s “SPD” code on the DD-214 is “HPD”. This code indicates that the Applicant waived his administrative discharge board and did not contest his separation from the Navy. The Applicant bears the burden of establishing his issues through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. The Applicant’s statements alone that he never violated his retention warning do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case. Relief denied.

When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. A general (under honorable conditions) discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member's conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member's military record. T he Applicant’s service was marred by nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violations of UCMJ Article 92, failure to obey a lawful general order and Article 107, false official statement. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy. Such conduct falls far short of that expected of a member of the U.S. military and does not meet the requirements for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.
There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded, based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that could be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Board received and considered all of the Applicant’s submissions, including his Colorado Bureau of Investigation criminal records search, and superlative letters of recommendation. After careful consideration, the Board concluded the Applicant’s post-service achievements have been insufficient to mitigate his misconduct while in the Naval service. Relief denied.

 The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide any additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 Aug 2002 until Present, Article 1910-152 (formerly Article 3630550), SEPARATION BY REASON OF ALCOHOL ABUSE REHABILITATION.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600149

    Original file (ND0600149.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Naval Forces Marianas Support Activitydirected discharge with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure.030317: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: (Failure to obey a lawful order) Specification: In that Gunner’s Mate Third Class K_ L. B_, U.S. Navy, U.S. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post-service documentation for the Board to consider. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01458

    Original file (ND04-01458.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Applicant directed to report to the command DAPA for scheduling of treatment of alcohol dependence. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500530

    Original file (ND0500530.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Commanding Officer’s comments: Member met the criteria for separation under the provisions of MILPERSMAN 1910-152, Separation by Reasons of Alcohol Abuse Rehabilitation Failure. The record further reveals that the Applicant completed Level I CAAC alcohol rehabilitation treatment on 20000302 for serious alcohol incidents including showing up late to watch with alcohol on his breath and an arrest for public lewdness and public intoxication. The names, and votes of the members of the Board...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500746

    Original file (ND0500746.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 001103 - 001225 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 001226 Date of Discharge: 040506 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 03 04 10 Inactive: None The Applicant’s service record...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501220

    Original file (ND0501220.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on patient report and review of DAPA records, patient had numerous ETOH related incidents. 030115: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of Alcohol Abuse Rehabilitation Failure. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500646

    Original file (ND0500646.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    [Statement listed as enclosure on the Commanding Officer’s undated letter, but not found in service record. ]UNDATED: Commanding Officer, USS SHILOH informed the Commander, Navy Personnel Command (PERS-832) of the Applicant's discharge with a characterization of general (under honorable conditions) by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure. FA K_'s (Applicant’s) recent NAVPERS 1070/613 warning advised him that any future deficiencies in conduct; violations of the UCMJ, or conduct...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00673

    Original file (ND04-00673.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable, the reason for the discharge be changed to “alcohol abuse,” and “I respectfully request for the Board to take into consideration of changing my re-Entry code based upon my perseverance and dedication to making things right in my life with the Navy.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. However, due to his failure to follow his medically prescribed and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00796

    Original file (ND03-00796.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Statement from Applicant, undated Ten pages from Applicant’ service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 971220 - 971221 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01306

    Original file (ND04-01306.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to “allow re-entry.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of her service, reflects her willful failure to meet the requirements of her contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of her...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500131

    Original file (ND0500131.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Letter from Applicant dtd September 27, 2004 (2 pgs) Applicant’s DD Form 214 (2) Court Memorandum Letter of Commendation Awards Listing (2 pgs) Personnel Qualification Standards Listing Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal Citation Evaluation Report & Counseling Record (Partial) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of...