Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500460
Original file (ND0500460.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-ETSN, USNR (TAR)
Docket No. ND05-00460

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20050126. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20050511. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. "At the time I went UA I had requested leave because my son who was 3 yrs old at the time needed psychiatric treatment at the time to get help with his ADD. My wife could not handle him alone at the time. I had let the proper chain of command know the situation. I told them that my child needed me at the time and that I was prepared to go UA if no help was given. It wasn’t the best decision but at the time I thought it was the only thing I could do to help my son and my wife. At captain’s mast I had been asked if I would like to stay in. I told him that I would love to stay in the Navy if I could get transferred to get my son some help. He said that at the time the only thing that he could do for me was giving me an other than honorable discharge and that if I had stayed out of jail for a minimum of six (6) months that I could change it to an honorable discharge. My son has since that time received psychiatric help and is better. This is my third (3 rd ) time submitting this info. So please consider my case and allow it to be change to an Honorable Discharge. Thank you, D_ C_ Jr.”

Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
None were submitted by the Applicant

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     900912 - 900925  COG
         Active: USN                        900926 - 920130  HON

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 920131               Date of Discharge: 950815

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 04 10 20 (Does not exclude lost time)
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 5

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: NFIR

 Highest Rate: ET3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.48 (5)             Behavior: 3.56 (5)                OTA: 3.52

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, SSDR, BER

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 34

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

920131:  Reenlisted at Service School Command, Naval Training Center, GREAT
                  LAKES, IL for 5 years.

950217:  Applicant UA from USS INCHON (MCS 12) at 0900; intentions
                  unknown. Applicant missed ship's movement at 1000.

950317:  Applicant declared a deserter.

950317:  Record of UA shows Applicant returned to military jurisdiction at USAEC
                  and FLW.

950321:  Applicant UA from USS INCHON (MCS 12) (escapes custody of
                  USAEC and FLW); intentions unknown.

950327:  Applicant surrendered on board USS INCHON (LPH 12) at 1408.
950414:  Report of Return of Deserter. Applicant surrendered to military authorities at 1408 on 950327 on board USS INCHON (LPH 12). Retained on board for disciplinary action.
950407:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (2 Specs): UA from 950217 to 950317 (28days/S) and UA from 950321 to 950327 (6days/S), violation of UCMJ Article 87: Missing ship’s movement through design on 950217.
         Award: Restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-3. No indication of appeal in the record.

950602:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense as evidenced by one non-judicial punishment during his current enlistment.
950602:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to submit statements on own behalf either verbally or in writing and the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
950718:  Commanding Officer, USS INCHON (MCS 12) recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense as evidenced by one non-judicial punishment for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (2 Specs) -- UA from 950217 to 950317 and from 950321 to 950327 and violation of UCMJ, Article 87 -- Missing movement by design on 950217. Commanding Officer's comments (verbatim): ETSN Cisneros's behavior is unacceptable and cannot be tolerated. He blatantly disregarded Navy regulations without remorse. His continued presence is detrimental to the good order and discipline of this command. I strongly recommend his immediate separation from Naval service with and other than honorable discharge.

950803:  BUPERS Washington DC directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19950815 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C, D, and E).

Issue 1: The Applicant contends that his problems in the Navy can be attributed to the stress caused by being separated from his wife and three-year-old son, who required psychiatric treatment to help with his ADD . While he may feel that his family situation was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his willful misconduct and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief is denied.

When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member's conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member's military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by a nonjudicial punishment (NJP) proceeding for violations of Articles 86 (x2) and 87 of the UCMJ. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service.

The Applicant implies that, since he has stayed out of jail for a minimum of six (6) months following his discharge, he could have the characterization of that discharge changed to honorable. The Applicant must understand that t here is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded, based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider. Relief on this basis is denied.


The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9, effective
22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .
E. Under the Manual for Courts-Martial, a punitive discharge is authorized for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 87 Missing movement through design if adjudged at a Special or General Court-Martial.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00181

    Original file (ND02-00181.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Recommend a general discharge.950411: BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 950413 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A). The Applicant’s service was marred by award of non-judicial punishment on three occasions.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600168

    Original file (ND0600168.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Subject member examined by a Medical Officer on [this date]2. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00715

    Original file (ND99-00715.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00715 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990503, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214. Letters of Appreciation (2) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 930220 -...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00029

    Original file (ND04-00029.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. My decision to join the United States Navy was solely made as an attempt to prove something to my family. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01321

    Original file (ND03-01321.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly Article 3630620.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501010

    Original file (ND0501010.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Thank You M_ D_ (Applicant)” Thus, I recommend that MSSR D_ be administratively separated with an other than honorable discharge.”950728: Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0710 on 950728.950801: Applicant from unauthorized absence at 0700 on 950801.950802: Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0700 on 950802.950810: NAVDRUGLAB, San Diego, CA, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 950804, tested positive for amphetamine/methamphetamine.950824: BUPERS directed the Applicant's...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00359

    Original file (ND01-00359.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The Board will not grant relief concerning this issue. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501160

    Original file (ND0501160.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:“I would like the board to review my discharge & change it to honorable and/or change my RE-4 code to RE-3 or RE-2. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00011

    Original file (ND04-00011.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00011 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031001. Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:“1). INJUSTICE: Punishing me twice after already serving my punishment and time.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500493

    Original file (ND0500493.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND05-00493 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050202. I was unable to report for duty the next day, so I was given Captains Mass and was sent to the Level II Alcohol program. 950617: Applicant discharged.