Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500320
Original file (ND0500320.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-SA, USN
Docket No. ND05-00320

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20041210. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20050214. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “When I went on Active I was very young and immature this was my first time away from home. I got in fight but since my time on active duty, I have mature. I am requesting that the Board conduct a review of my discharge base on my military personnel file & requested that the Board change my discharge to honorable.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, NO DISCHARGE AUTHORIZATION AVAILABLE, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     941209 - 941219  COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 941220               Date of Discharge: 971202

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 11 13
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 20                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 61

 Highest Rate: OSSN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 4.00 (1)             Behavior: 3.00 (1)                OTA: 3.67

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, SSDR

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

950605:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (IAW BUPERS Washington, DC MSG 311927Z MAY 95 you are being retained in the Naval Service in spite of your defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry into Naval Service as evidenced by your failure to disclose prior service conviction for misdemeanor possession of a controlled substance and petty larceny on 930731), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

961209:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Violation of UCMJ, Article 107, False official statements; violation of UCMJ, Article 128, Assault consummated by a battery), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

961209:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 107: False official statements; violation of UCMJ, Article 128: Assault consummated by a battery, in that SN M_ D. F_, did on or about 2300, 961201, at the Galaxy Night Club, located at Panama City, unlawfully grab FN S_ in a head lock and strike him on the head twice with his fist.
Award: Forfeiture of $490.00, reduction to OSSA, 45 days extra duty and restriction to the limits of USS TICONDEROGA (CG-47). No indication of appeal in the record.
971024:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 128: Assault consummated by a battery, in that SN M_ D. F_, did on or about 0805, 971024, unlawfully strike SH2 H_ in the face, on the shoulders and arms with his fist.
Award: Forfeiture of $250.00 pay per month for 2 months, 45 days extra duty and restriction to the limits of USS TICONDEROGA (CG-47), reduction to E-2. No indication of appeal in the record.
971024:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.
971024:  Applicant advised of rights and elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation

971125:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

971126:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Failure to obey order or regulation; violation of UCMJ, Article 107: False official statements; violation of UCMJ, Article 134: Bribery and graft; violation of UCMJ, Article 134: Soliciting another to commit an offense.
         Award: 3 days confinement on Bread & Water, forfeiture of $505.00 pay per month for 2 months. No indication of appeal in the record.

971202:  Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct; authority: MILPERSMAN 3630600 per DD Form 214.

NO DISCHARGE AUTHORIZATION AVAILABLE

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19971202 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A). After a thorough review of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (B and C). The presumption of regularity of governmental affairs was applied by the Board in this case in the absence of a complete discharge package (D).

 Issue 1. A characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions is warranted when the member's conduct constitutes a significant departure from that expected of a sailor. The Applicant’s service was marred by award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on three occasions for disobedience of lawful orders, false official statements, two assaults, bribery, graft and soliciting another to commit an offense. While he may feel that his youth and immaturity at the time were factors that contributed to his actions, the record clearly reflects his disregard for the requirements of military discipline and demonstrated that he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.
The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Normally, to permit relief, an inequity or impropriety must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such inequity or impropriety is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.













Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C, Change 14, effective 03 Oct 96 until 11 Dec 97), Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – A PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .
D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.


PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil” .

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00555

    Original file (ND02-00555.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Recommend separation from naval service with an other than Honorable Discharge.911008: BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. The Applicant was awarded non-judicial punishment (NJP) on 4 occasions for the violation of UCMJ Articles 86, 92, 107, 122, 128, and 131. The Applicant served only 1 year, 10 months and 21 days of a four-year enlistment.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500545

    Original file (ND0500545.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00808

    Original file (ND01-00808.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I was a day away from honorable. Age at Entry: 18 Years Contracted: 3 Education Level: 12 AFQT: 32 Highest Rate: FN Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Performance: 2.50 (2) Behavior: 2.00 (2) OTA: 2.40 (5.0 Evals) Military Decorations: None Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: SSDR, JMUC Days of Unauthorized Absence: None Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500573

    Original file (MD0500573.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).Issue 1: The Applicant claims that his discharge was improper as his record shows he did not have a pattern of misconduct. In the Applicant's case, the NDRB found that a pattern of misconduct was established by the following aggravating factors contained in the record: o four formal counseling (Page 11) entries for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500126

    Original file (ND0500126.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “Propriety and Equity Issue(s): The applicant’s service was generally honorable and should be characterized as such.Statement: In accordance with 32 CFR § 724, and SECNAVINST 5420.174D, the Veterans of Foreign Wars submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) the above issue and following statement in supplement to the Applicant’s petition. Additionally, the Applicant stated that he was punished three times for the same offense by having his rank stripped, serving brig time and being...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00053

    Original file (ND99-00053.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    My discharge wasn't base on my service in the Navy. No indication of appeal in the record.960813: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of serious offenses as evidenced by your violation of the UCMJ, Article 128, assault consummated by a battery on 23 April 1996, Article 134, false or unauthorized pass offense on 26 January 1996, and Article 134, wrongfully committing an indecent act on 23...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00002

    Original file (ND04-00002.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-SR, USNR Docket No. The reasons for my request in switching a other than honorable to an honorable are so I may re-enlist in the service. 951212: Vacate of reduction in rate to SA suspended at Commander’s NJP of 951011 vacated this date due to continued misconduct.951212: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 128: Assault consummated by a battery on 951212.Award: Restriction and extra duty for 30...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00021

    Original file (ND99-00021.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board found this issue to be without merit. In the applicant’s issues 2 and 3, the Board found these issues to be without merit. You may obtain a copy of DoD Directive 1332.28 by writing to: DA Military Review Boards Agency Management Information and Support Directorate Armed Forces...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00760

    Original file (ND01-00760.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    901205: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct and drug abuse. 901210: CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant’s...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00879

    Original file (ND02-00879.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. 960618: USS CONSTELLATION (CV-64) notified Applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense as evidenced by non-judicial punishment on 950810 for violation of Article 128 of the UCMJ, assault consummated by a battery, non-judicial punishment on...