Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500294
Original file (ND0500294.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-MM3, USN
Docket No. ND05-00294

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20041210. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20050727. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-106 (formerly 3630650).



PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“In FEB 2003, I was stationed at NWS Charleston, SC. During this time I fell into a depression and made an attempt to hurt myself. I feel very little was done on my command’s part to help me, as they decided to assign me to New Jersey after I received basic treatment with no change of my condition, I felt I felt no other option but to take unauthorized absence. I do no use this as an excuse for what I did, but I feel I deserve an upgrade in discharge. I currently have an OTH discharge and cannot find a good job to help bring my life back on track. My only evidence is my medical record my command at NWS Charleston was DTP (transition personnel) at NNPTC.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
No documents were submitted by the Applicant.









PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     010618 - 010808  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 010809               Date of Discharge: 040429

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 11 21
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4 (24 month extension)

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 79

 Highest Rate: MM3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.00 (3)             Behavior: 3.00 (3)                OTA: 3.00

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 271

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):
UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-106 (formerly 3630650).

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

030207   Applicant referred to NH Psychology Clinic by Naval Weapon Station Branch Clinic for evaluation for continued Naval Service and/or the Nuclear Power Program, after his release from Palemetto Hospital for suicidal Ideation. (1 week observation).
030212   Applicant found Not Physically Qualified (NPQ) for Nuclear Power Program and Submarines due to suicide ideation. Applicant found fit for full duty, re-assignment and transfer.

030401   Applicant found fit for sea duty by NNPTC UNDERSEA MEDICINE CLINIC.

030429   Re-evaluation found Applicant Not Physically Qualified (NPQ) until further evaluation by Neurology clinic.

030501   Applicant evaluated at Naval Hospital Charleston SC by LCDR T_ USN, MC. Applicant diagnosed with a mild form of Tourette’s Syndrome. LCDR T_ stated symptoms would not interfere with performance of duties. Applicant declined therapy.

030717:  Applicant UA from USS DETROIT (AOE-4) Earle, NJ since 0715, 030717.

040413:  Applicant apprehended by civil authority at San Antonio, TX at 1130, 040413. Returned to military control at Navy Absentee Collection and Information Center (NACIC) Great Lakes, IL at 1130, 040413. Transferred to TPU GLAKES IL.

040416:  Charges preferred for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 86: Did on or about 0715, 030717 without authority, absent himself from his organization, to wit: USS DETROIT (AOE-4) located at Earle, New Jersey, and did remain so absent until on or about 1130, 040413.

040416:  Applicant requested an administrative discharge under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial. The Applicant stated he understood the elements of the offense(s) with which he was charged, and admitted he was guilty of all the charges preferred against him. Specifically, he admitted to violating UCMJ, Article 86: Did on or about 0715, 030717 without authority, absent himself from his organization, to wit: USS DETROIT (AOE-4) located at Earle, New Jersey, and did remain so absent until on or about 1130, 040413. The Applicant understood that if discharged under other than honorable conditions, it might deprive him of virtually all veterans' benefits based upon his current enlistment, and that he might expect to encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life in situations wherein the type of service rendered or the character of discharge received therefrom may have a bearing.
040419:  The Commanding Officer, exercising GCMCA, approved the request for an administrative separation in lieu of a trial by court-martial, and directed Applicant’s discharge.
PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20040429 under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial (A and B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 The Applicant states that he had no choice but to go UA because of his depression and his command’s failure to help him with his medical condition. The Board found that in a signed statement on 20040416, the Applicant requested an administrative discharge under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial, he consulted with counsel, and was fully advised of the implications of his request. The Applicant understood that if discharged under other than honorable conditions, it might deprive him of virtually all veterans' benefits based upon his current enlistment, and that he might expect to encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life in situations wherein the type of service rendered or the character of discharge received from there may have a bearing. On 20 040416 the Applicant stated he understood the elements of the offenses with which he was charged and admitted he was guilty of violating UCMJ Article 86: (Absent without authority) from the USS Detroit (AOE-4) from 030717 to 040413. While he may feel that his medical condition, command indifference, and perceived lack of treatment were factors that contributed to his actions, the evidence shows that the Applicant was evaluated at his command’s request by competent medical authorities (20 030501) and prescribed a treatment plan that the Applicant refused. The Board found no evidence to support the Applicant’s contention that he was denied proper medical care for his condition while on active duty, or that he was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. The applicant’s record however does reflect the Applicant’s disregard for the requirements of military discipline and demonstrated that he was unfit for further service. Therefore, relief on this basis is denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.








Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 Aug 2002 until Present, Article 1910-106 (formerly 3630650), SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL.

B. A punitive bad conduct discharge may be adjudged for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 86, unauthorized absence for a period more than 30 days upon conviction by a Special or General Court-Martial, in accordance with the Manual for Courts-Martial.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .
D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

 PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT


If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500432

    Original file (ND0500432.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND05-00432 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050112. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). 030905: Applicant to unauthorized absence 2359, 030905.031118: Applicant apprehended by civilian authorities at 0155, 031105 for unauthorized absence and returned to military control 1130, 031118 (61 days/apprehended).031120: Court-Martial charges preferred...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00793

    Original file (ND01-00793.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00793 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010522, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. During my enlistment and before I suffered many losses in my personal life.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01218

    Original file (ND03-01218.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-01218 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030710. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record review.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01027

    Original file (ND02-01027.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-01027 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020715, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 990730 - 991004 COG Active:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600236

    Original file (ND0600236.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Relief is not warranted.The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post-service documentation for the Board to consider.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600497

    Original file (ND0600497.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Decisional Issues: Equity – Misdiagnosis Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 4)Letter from Applicant, dtd February 9, 2006 Excerpts from Service Record (2 pgs)Medical Documentation from Charleston Naval Hospital, dtd...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500904

    Original file (ND0500904.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Sincerely, [signed] D_ K. M_ (Applicant)" Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered: Applicant’s DD Form 214 Service-related documents (14 pages) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500173

    Original file (ND0500173.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered: Letter of Support from O_ W_, Calvary Christian Center, dated October 26, 2004 Applicant’s DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 990629 -...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00804

    Original file (ND03-00804.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00804 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030402. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00889

    Original file (ND01-00889.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00889 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010702, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. After a review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of the evidence assembled for review, we continue to note the request of the appellant of an upgrade of his Under...