Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500193
Original file (ND0500193.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-HTFA, USN
Docket No. ND05-00193

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20041109. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). The Applicant requests a documentary record review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293. Subsequent to the application, the Applicant obtained representation from the American Legion.

Decision

A documentary review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20050323. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was considered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly Article 3630620.




PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “When in the Navy, I was not as mature as now. It was the first time that I had actually experienced freedom of acting as an adult. This was at an early age and I made unwise decisions. Now that I have matured, I have just completed Police training at Gulf Coast Community College. I am still attending college to complete my Bachelors degree. Also, I am now married with a child who will soon be born. My record has been clean since discharge. Changing my discharge will assist me in obtaining gainful employment that will aid me in providing for my family. A copy of my Police Training Certificate and audit are attached.”

Additional issues submitted by Applicant’s representative (American Legion):

 2. “Equity Issue: Based on our review of evidentiary record and on behalf of this former member, we request that the Board consider provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174D, Part V, Paragraph 503, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of this application.
_______________________________________________________________________
In accordance with Title 32, CFR, Section 724.116 and SECNAVINST 5420.174D, Part I, Paragraph 1.20, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue and following statement in supplement to this Applicant’s petition.

Review of the available records reflect that this former member served without incident until 010311 when he was arrested for disorderly conduct and resisting arrest. The SR indicates that he tested positive for illegal substance abuse and, following due process notifications, was discharged Under Other Than Honorable Conditions due to misconduct as authorized by NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146.

Essentially, as noted on DD Form 293, this Applicant is requesting that his discharge be upgraded because youth and immaturity contributed to and partly extenuated his misconduct of record and because he has been a productive citizen since his discharge. He has submitted 8 pages of additional documentation attesting to his good post service character, hard work and educational pursuits for consideration.

The American Legion’s express purpose in providing this statement and any other submittals or evidence filed is to assist this Applicant in the clarification and resolution of the impropriety or inequity raised. To that end, we rest assured that the NDRB’s final decision will reflect sound equitable principles consistent in law, regulation, policy and discretion as promulgated by Title 10, USC, Section 1553 and set forth in Title 32, CFR, Part 724 and SECNAVINST 5420.174D.

This case is now respectfully submitted for deliberation and disposition.”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Appointment of veterans service organization as claimant’s representative, dated October 18, 2004 (3 pages)
Unofficial transcript (5 pages)
Certificate from Gulf Coast Community College, dated Spring 2004
Letter to Applicant from Gulf Coast Community College, dated June 7, 2002
Certificate of completion, dated June 4, 2002
Applicant’s DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USANG           991101 - 991020  HON - RELAD
         Active: None
         
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 000614               Date of Discharge: 010509

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 10 26
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: GED              AFQT: 49

 Highest Rate: HTFA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NMA*                          Behavior: 1.00 (1)                OTA: 1.00

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Army Service Ribbon

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

*No marks assigned

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

010322:  Civilian Charges: Arrested by Bay County Sheriff Office for disorderly conduct and resisting a law enforcement officer with violence. No further information found in service record. [Extracted from Commanding Officer’s letter dated 010420.]

010420:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for administrative separation processing by reason of misconduct due to drug use. Applicant notified that if separation is approved, the least favorable characterization of service possible is under other than honorable conditions.
010420:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27(b), elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
010420:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

010427:  Chief of Naval Education and Training directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

010509:  Applicant’s evaluation report and counseling record, Block 43: Comments on performance contains the following information: tested positive for illegal substance abuse.

Complete discharge package unavailable

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20010509 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). After a thorough review of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (B and C). The presumption of regularity of governmental affairs was applied by the Board in this case in the absence of a complete discharge package (D).

Issues 1 and 2: Normally, to permit relief, an impropriety or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such impropriety or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. T he Applicant’s service was marred by illegal substance abuse, disorderly conduct and resisting a law enforcement officer with violence. As a result of this misconduct, the Applicant was administratively processed for misconduct by reason of drug abuse. Mandatory processing for separation is required for sailors who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to rebut the presumption of his illegal drug use or that his resulting separation from the Naval service was improper or inequitable . Relief denied.

There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded, based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that could be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Board received and considered all of the Applicant’s submissions, including his unofficial transcripts, Police training certificates, and his meritorious academic achievements. Unfortunately, as of this time, the Applicant’s post-service conduct has been insufficient to mitigate his misconduct while in the Naval service. Relief denied.

There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely for the purpose of enhancing employment opportunities and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination on the propriety and equity of the discharge.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide any additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 31, dated 20 Feb 01, effective 12 Feb 2001 until 15 Jul 2001, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .
D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil” .

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500720

    Original file (ND0500720.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND05-00720 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050317. Relief denied.The record does not document NJP for the drug use that resulted in the Applicant’s administrative discharge or the administrative discharge process. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00695

    Original file (ND02-00695.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00695 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020418, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).Issue 1: The Board’s charter limits its review to a determination on the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00734

    Original file (ND03-00734.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Non-judicial punishment Notification and Election of Rights (2 pages) Distinguished Military Graduate Certificate date November 7, 2000 Certificate of Completion (U.S. Verifiable proof of any...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01195

    Original file (ND04-01195.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-01195 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040721. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. _______________________________________________________________________ In accordance with Title 32, CFR, Section 724.166 and SECNAVINST 5420.174D, Part I, Paragraph 1.20, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue and following...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00743

    Original file (ND04-00743.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “To whom this letter concerns,I was discharged from the Navy in June 2003 with an OTH because I failed a drug test for ecstasy. I do have specific reason for attempting to get my OTH to a general discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500465

    Original file (ND0500465.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND05-00465 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050126. “The evidence submitted attests the Applicant has become a productive member of the community therefore, we ask that you change the discharge to honorable based on post service performance and conduct.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (2) Job/character reference from Office...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500586

    Original file (ND0500586.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND05-00586 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050223. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge changed to general/under honorable conditions. 040301: Applicant discharged.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500942

    Original file (ND0500942.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Should you need further information or have questions, my contact information above.D_ C. P_ (Applicant) ” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (2) Certificate of Completion from Forsyth Technical Community College (HVAC/H3...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01139

    Original file (ND03-01139.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040504. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 000229 -...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500285

    Original file (ND0500285.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. No indication of appeal in the record.990106: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19990106 by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (A) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions.