Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500140
Original file (ND0500140.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-TMSR, USN
Docket No. ND05-00140

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20041020. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter the applicant was informed that she was approaching the 15 year point for review by this Board and was encouraged to attend a personal appearance hearing in the Washington, D. C. area. The Applicant did not respond.

Decision

A documentary review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20050329. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct - Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “My discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident with no other adverse action. I was young and never away from home. I gave into peer pressure to try “coke”. I never did it again. I don’t smoke, drink, or use any drugs. I know now that peer pressure can ruin your life. I have lived with the humiliation for years. I want to set a good example for my daughter. I really am a good citizen I have had same job for 12 years. I go to church, I wear my seatbelt, and I pay my taxes. The only trouble I have ever been in is because I made the wrong decision that I thought would keep my so-called “Friends”. I can’t even remember their names. That was the worst mistake I ever made, I pray everyday that I could take that moment back. I was so proud to wear the Navy uniform.”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214
Police Certificate, dated 19 Nov 2004
Letter Confirming Employment, undated
Character Reference Letter from M_ P. S_, dated 30 Aug 2004
Character Reference Letter from Ofc. G_ S_, undated

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     880602 - 880626  COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 880627               Date of Discharge: 900917

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 02 21
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12 ½                       AFQT: 58

 Highest Rate: TMSA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 2.10 (2)             Behavior: 2.46 (3)                OTA: 2.70

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: SSDR, LoC

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 33

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct - Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

890620:  Applicant to unauthorized absence 1230, 890620.

890720:  Applicant declared a deserter.

890723:  Applicant from unauthorized absence 2044, 890723 (33 days/surrendered).

890727:  Summary Court-Martial.
         Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 86:
         Specification: Unauthorized absence from 890620 to 890723.
          Finding: to Charge I and the specification thereunder, guilty.
          Sentence: Forfeiture of $466.00, restriction for 60 days, reduced to E-1.
         CA action 890803: Sentence approved and ordered executed.

890908:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Assault.), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

900823:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Dereliction in performance of duties and damaged military property.), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

900831:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongfully use cocaine.
         Award: Forfeiture of $362 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-1. No indication of appeal in the record.
900904:  Medical evaluation for drug abuse: Applicant denied any drug use, unable to find any evidence of dependency. No treatment necessary.

900904:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by Applicant’s one summary courts-martial and one nonjudicial punishment during the current enlistment. Applicant notified that if separation is approved, the least favorable characterization of service is under other than honorable conditions.

900904:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27(b), elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation. Applicant did not object to the separation.
900905:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse and misconduct due to a commission of a serious offense.

900911:  CNMPC directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19900917 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1: Normally, to permit relief, an impropriety or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such impropriety or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. The Applicant was awarded nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for a violation of UCMJ Article 112a, wrongful drug use. Additionally, she was convicted at summary court-martial for a violation of UCMJ Article 86, unauthorized absence for a period of 33 days. The Applicant implies that her discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident. The Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Mandatory processing for separation is required for sailors who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of her service, reflects her willful failure to meet the requirements of her contract with the U.S. Navy. Such conduct falls far short of that expected of a member of the U.S. military and does not meet the requirements for an upgrade of her characterization of service. As such, relief is denied.

There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded, based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that could be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Board received and considered all of the Applicant’s submissions, including her police records check, employment verification and character reference letters. Unfortunately, as of this time, the Applicant’s post-service conduct has been insufficient to mitigate her misconduct while in the Naval service. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to her discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A), Change 11, effective
14 Jun 90 until 14 Aug 91, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil” .

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00542

    Original file (ND99-00542.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. ]910825: DAAR: Positive for marijuana use, consensual urinalysis, not dependent, evaluated by CAAC.910828: Naval Branch Medical, NAS Alameda, CA: Used 1 - 3 times monthly, drug abuse confirmed, pt appears amenable to administrative separation.910904: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00735

    Original file (ND00-00735.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.890317: Medical evaluation for alcohol/drug abuse found the applicant to be alcohol and cocaine dependent. Relief is denied.The applicant’s second issue states: “I received awards and decorations.” The NDRB found that despite receiving various unit awards that the discharge was proper and equitable as issued. The applicant’s fourth issue states: “My record of promotions showed I was generally a good service member.” The NDRB found the applicant’s...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00791

    Original file (ND02-00791.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00791 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020513, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Letter of Recommendation from LCdr T_ P. S_ USN, dated 24Sept1997 Copy of Character Witness Statement from D_ D. A_ JOC (SW/AW), USNdated 1June1997 Copy of Character Witness Statement from...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01119

    Original file (ND02-01119.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Character reference, dated May 21, 2002 Applicant's DD Form 214 Eighteen pages from Applicant's service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 871214 - 881010 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 881011 Date of Discharge: 920805 Length of Service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500717

    Original file (ND0500717.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION 040324: Applicant from unauthorized absence at 0750 (44 days/surrendered).040329: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (Absent without leave)

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01137

    Original file (ND04-01137.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. And hopefully thru my records it will prove that I was doing all I could to be the best I could be.M_ P_ (Applicant)”Additional issues submitted by Applicant’s representative (Disabled American Veterans): “Dear Chairperson:After a review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500557

    Original file (ND0500557.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    000525: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions. 000731: DD-214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. After a review of all of the available evidence in the Applicant’s case, the administrative...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01181

    Original file (ND04-01181.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to her discharge at that time.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00424

    Original file (ND00-00424.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    991021: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge general (under honorable conditions). The attached documents along with my service record will that my general discharge should be upgraded.” The NDRB found the applicant’s issue without merit. After review of the applicant’s record the NDRB found,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500009

    Original file (ND0500009.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION [Applicant’s signature] H_ D. D_, Affiant (Applicant)” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (2 pages)Enlisted Performance Evaluation (2 pages) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service...