Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501568
Original file (MD0501568.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-PVT, USMC
Docket No. MD05-01568

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20050920. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20060608. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues, as stated

Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application to the Board:

“I don’t feel a few UA charges for being late to formations warrant the discharge which I receive as others seemed to get away with it.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Only the service record book was reviewed. The Applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board’s consideration.

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USMCR (DEP)    20011011 - 20020527               COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 20020528             Date of Discharge: 20040630

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

 Active: 02 01 03
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: None
         Confinement:              None

 Age at Entry: 18

Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 49

 Highest Rank: LCpl                                  MOS: 3051/5811

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 3.8 (5)                                Conduct: 3.7 (5)

 Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as stated on the DD Form 214): Sea Service Deployment Ribbon, National Defense Service Medal


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):
UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.3.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

030717:  Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (On 030712 SNM violated article 108 of the UCMJ which could of resulted in NJP by breaking a window of the fourth deck lounge of the barracks.), necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued. Directed to pay $400 to repair the window.

030825:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86.
         Specification: On or about 0730 on 0030811, SNM was absent from his point of place of duty and remained absent until on or about 0815 on 030811.
         Violation of UCMJ, Article 91:
         Specification: On or about 0815 on 030811, SNM displayed insubordinate conduct towards a Noncommissioned Officer by flipping over two chairs and using profane language towards a Noncommissioned Officer.
         Violation of UCMJ, Article 92:
         Specification: On or about 0815 on 030811, SNM did not take a seat and walked off after being told to take a seat by a Noncommissioned Officer.
         Award: 21 days of correctional custody unit. Not appealed.

030825:  Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (On 030825 SNM was found guilty at battalion level NJP for violating articles 86, 91, and 92 of the UCMJ), necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

030826:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92:
         Specification: On or about 030825, SNM failed to obey by refusing to train at the Correctional Custody Unit.
 Award: Forfeiture of $645.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-2. Not appealed.
030826:  Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (On 030826 SNM was found guilty at battalion level NJP for violating articles 92 of the UCMJ by refusing to train while assigned to CCU, Camp Hanson, Okinawa, Japan.), necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
031215:  Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (On 031203 SNM Applicant violated article 91 and 92 of the UCMJ which could have resulted in NJP by being disrespectful and not following orders of a NCO.), necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

040309:  Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (Non-recommendation for Lance Corporal for the month on April, SNM is pending adjudication for Violation of Articles 86, 92.), necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
040312:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86:
         Specification: On 26 th Jan 04; SNM was not at his appointed place of duty which was at the Supply Company Office for a 0730 Accountability Formation.
 Violation of UCMJ, Article 92:
Specification: On 23 Jan 04; SNM was informed of the out of bounds limits set forth by MCO. SNM went out of bounds during liberty hours, broke the out of bounds limit by driving to Florida to get married.
         Award: Forfeiture of $552.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days (suspended for 6 months), reduction to E-1. Not appealed.

040316:  Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (Violation of Articles 86, 92. Article 86, On 26 Jan 04 SNM was not at his appointed place of duty. SNM was instructed to be at the Supply Company office from formation prior to being released. Article 92 during the weekend of 23 Jan 04 SNM went further than the out of bounds limit to Florida to be married without authorization.), sources of assistance provided, and advised being processed for administrative discharge action.

040420:  Vacated suspension of punishment (Forfeiture of $552.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days awarded at NJP 040312) due to continued misconduct, specifically, violated Article 86 in that he failed to report to work at 0645 on 040405 and a Battalion formation at 0630 on 040409.

040430:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (2 specs):
         Specification 1: On 040406 at 0645 SNM failed to be at his appointed place of duty, SNM arrived at approximately 0730.
         Specification 2: On 040409 failed to show up at his appointed place of duty at 0630, SNM arrived at approximately 0830.
         Award: Forfeiture of $596.00 pay per month for 2 months (suspended for 6 months), restriction and extra duty for 45 days. Not appealed.

040430:  Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (Violation of Aricles 86x2, On 040406, at 0645 SNM failed to report to work for a Service C inspection, SNM did not report to work until approximately 0730, SNM stated he had over slept. On 040409 SNM failed to show up for Battalion formation at 0630, SNM arrived at approximately 0830 and checked in with the OOD.), necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued

040525:  Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (Administration Separation because of a pattern of misconduct. At this time, my Commanding Officer feels that my conduct has not improved; I am being processed for administrative Separation.)
040608:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service which you may receive is Other Than Honorable Conditions. Although the Commander, 2d Force Service Support Group will make the determination of characterization if you are separated, I am recommending you receive an Other Than Honorable characterization of service. The factual basis for this recommendation was the adjudication at four Battalion Level NJP respectively adjudicated on 25 Aug 03, 26 Aug 03, 12 Mar 04, 30 April 04; all four of these NJP’s occurred within the same enlistment.

040608:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

040608:  Commanding Officer, 2d Supply Battalion, recommended to Commander, 2d Force Service Support Group, that the Applicant be discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct. The factual basis for this recommendation was based on the adjudication of the respondent at Battalion level NJP for: Violation of 86, 91, 92 adjudicated on 25 Aug 03; Violation of Article 92 adjudicated on 26 Aug 03; Violation of Article 86, 92 adjudicated on 12 Mar 04; violation of Article 86x2 adjudicated on 30 April 2004; all four of these NJP’s occurred within the same enlistment. Commanding Officer’s comments: “This command has exhausted every lesser means possible before resorting to more severe actions and Private L_ (Applicant) has yet to show improvements. Private L_ (Applicant) has been afforded the opportunity to redeem himself at Battalion level NJP and in turn failed to do so by being UA on more than one occasion, which was the condition for the suspension of his punishment awarded at his 12 March 04 NJP, thus compelling the Commanding Officer to vacate such suspension (see enclosure 5). Due to the detraction of good order and discipline that Private L_ (Applicant) as brought upon this command, it is requested that he be separated from the military service in the most expeditious manner.”

040623:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

040624:  Commander, 2d Force Service Support Group, advised the Commandant of the Marine Corps, Headquarters (MMSB) that the Applicant will be discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20040630 by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A and B) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a Marine’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. T he Applicant’s service was marred by 7 retention warnings, 4 nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violations of Articles 86 (4 specs), 91, and 92 (3 specs) of the UCMJ. Additionally, the Applicant was counseled for unadjudicated misconduct for violations of Article 108, 91, and 92 of the UCMJ. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, was far below that required for an upgrade of the characterization of service. An upgrade would be inappropriate. Relief is therefore denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 01 Sep 2001 until Present.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 91, 92, and 108.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .


PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy    Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501493

    Original file (MD0501493.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, falls well below that required for an upgrade in characterization of service.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600761

    Original file (MD0600761.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). ], Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, and discharge warning issued .050606: Commanding Officer, Combat Service Support Battalion-1 recommended that the Applicant be discharged under other than honorable characterization by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.050630: NJP for violation of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01006

    Original file (MD02-01006.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-01006 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020708, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions and the reason for the discharge be changed to secretary authority. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.930512: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 121: Did on or about 1700, 930427 steal (1) cassette tape...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600530

    Original file (MD0600530.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In particular, the Applicant stated he believed he was guilty of violating Article 134 of the UCMJ.930928: SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.931025: GCMCA, Commander, 1 st Marine Expeditionary Brigade, directed the Applicant's general under honorable conditions discharge by reason of separation in lieu of trial by court-martial. The Applicant indicated in the statement that he understood the character of service could be general under honorable conditions. You may...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501235

    Original file (MD0501235.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general (under honorable conditions). The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, falls well below that required for an honorable characterization of service. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501381

    Original file (MD0501381.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The infractions cited in the commanding officer’s recommendation occurred prior to corrective actions and did not warrant admin separation until my enlistment was due to expire.”Additional issues submitted by Applicant’s representative: “Issue 1: Whether applicant received a fair & impartial hearing on discharge by not having the recommendations of his superior officers, whom had direct knowledge of his military ethics & bearing, considered...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500388

    Original file (MD0500388.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Violation of UCMJ, Article 89: Specification: Disrespect towards a Superior Commissioned Officer Violation of UCMJ, Article 91: Specification: Insubordinate conduct towards a noncommissioned officer.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00340

    Original file (MD03-00340.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00340 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20021217. The Applicant requests that the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Thank you for considering my application.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600025

    Original file (MD0600025.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general (under honorable conditions). The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, falls well below that required for an upgrade. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501458

    Original file (MD0501458.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Applicant chose not to make a statement.040109: Acknowledged understanding of eligibility but not recommended for promotion to Cpl for the month of Feb 04 due to Pending Disciplinary Charges/Non-judicial Punishment. Article 92: Specification 1: In that Lance Corporal B_ F. O_(Applicant), U.S. Marine Corps, on active duty, did, at Camp Pendleton, CA, on or about 11 December 2003, violate a lawful general order, to wit: paragraph 6310.c of Base...