Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501457
Original file (MD0501457.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-LCpl, USMCR
Docket No. MD05-01457

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20050104. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). The Applicant requests a personal appearance hearing before the Board in the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan area. The Applicant designated a non-credentialed representative on the DD Form 293.

 Decision

A personal appearance discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20060405. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

Applicant’s issues, submitted at the time of the personal appearance discharge review, which supercede all prior issues submitted:

“ Issue 1. Equity. During my time in the Marine Corps I was an outstanding Marine. Coiming out of basic training I was Pvt. First Class, upon completion, received Meritorious Mass at MCT. Once I arrived at 4 th Supply Battalion Greenville, SC, I received promotion to LCpl. and Later received another recommendation for Meritorious Mass. I was a Marine should be. I then made some bad decisions which resulted in my discharge From the Marine Corps.

Issue 2. Equity. Since then I have been an active member in the church and community. I have moved from SC to Va. I am currently employed with Maytag Factory Services, were I am very productive, reliable, and courteous person. All of what made me an Outstanding Marine.

2006 April 5
G_ L. K_ “ (Applicant’s signature)
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant at the time of the personal appearance discharge review, was considered:

Letter of character reference from D_ E. B_, dtd April 1, 2006
Letter of character reference from I_ E. C_, dtd April 4, 2006
Letter of character reference from W_ P_, dtd April 4, 2006

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USMCR (DEP)    19971018*– 19980709               ELS
         Active: None

*Dates extracted from statement of understanding.

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 19980715             Date of Discharge: 20010202

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

 Active: 00 05 04
         Inactive: 02 01 14

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: None
         Confinement:              None

 Age at Entry: 17 (Parental Consent)

 Years Contracted: 8

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 35

 Highest Rank: LCpl                         MOS: 2311

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: NA*                  Conduct: NA*

 Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as stated on the DD Form 214): None

*Not Available


 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):
UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/UNSAT PARTICIPATION IN READY RESERVE; authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6213.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

980714:  Enlistment contract into the USMCR documents acknowledgement of the requirement to participate in 48 scheduled drills and not less than 14 days of annual training per year for 6 years upon completion of initial active duty training.

990613:  Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (The proper procedures for obtaining an excused absence. In the future, if you are unable to attend any scheduled IDT, you will contact the 1st SGT prior to the scheduled drill for further instructions.), necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided.

990613:  Acknowledged understanding of eligibility but not recommended for promotion to Cpl for the quarter of July, August, and September because of unauthorized absences. Applicant chose not to make a statement.

000504:  Unsatisfactory Participation: Ammunition Company 1 st Sgt J_ attempted to contact the Applicant by phone. No answer.

000505:  Unsatisfactory Participation: Applicant contacted by phone by the Ammunition Company 1 st Sgt J_. Applicant stated that he did not have transportation.

000506:  Unsatisfactory Participation: Applicant contacted by phone by the Ammunition Company 1 st Sgt J_. Applicant stated that he did not have transportation.

000507:  Unsatisfactory Participation: Ammunition Company 1 st Sgt J_ attempted to contact the Applicant by phone. No answer.

000507:  Commanding Officer, Ammunition Company, notified the Applicant via letter (certified receipt #Z371753494 sent on 000509) of unsatisfactory drill participation on 000504, 000505, 000506, and 000507. Applicant’s father signed receipt on 000511. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
0000511:         Applicant’s father, G_ K_, signed receipt and accepted delivery of the certified mail, receipt #Z371753494.
 000610:  Unsatisfactory Participation: Applicant contacted by phone by the Ammunition Company, LCpl H_ and informed that he had missed drills. Applicant stated that he did not know about drill even though he stated he had a schedule and said he had no way here.

000611:  Unsatisfactory Participation: Applicant contacted by phone by the Ammunition Company, LCpl H_ and informed that he had missed drills. Applicant stated that he had a schedule, and could not get a ride to drill.
000611:  Acknowledged understanding of eligibility but not recommended for promotion to Cpl for the quarter of July, August, and September because of unauthorized absences. Applicant not available for signature.

000611:  Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (Unauthorized absences on the following dates: 000504, 000505, 000506, and 000507.), necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued. Applicant not available for signature.

 000611:  Commanding Officer, Ammunition Company, notified the Applicant via letter of unsatisfactory drill participation on 000610 and 006011 (certified receipt #Z371753792). The Applicant’s mother, B_ K_, signed the receipt, not dated. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

000611:  Applicant notified via letter (certified receipt #Z371753792 sent on 000612), of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of unsatisfactory participation with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The Applicant’s mother, B_ K_, signed the receipt, not dated. The factual basis for this recommendation was unexcused absences from eleven (11) scheduled drills: 4 May 00 (1), 5 May 00 (2), 6 May 00 (2), 7 May 00 (2), 10 Jun 00 (2) and 11 Jun 00 (2). Failure to respond after being afforded a reasonable opportunity to consult with counsel constitutes waiver of rights. The Applicant was directed to respond to the notification by completing and returning the Acknowledgement of Respondent’s Rights within the following time after receiving the notification: two (2) working days if you received it in person; 20 days if you received it by mail.

000715:  Applicant contacted by phone by the Ammunition Company 1 st Sgt J_ and informed that he had missed 13 drills. Applicant stated that he could not get a ride, does not have a driver’s license.


000715:  Commanding Officer notified the Applicant of unsatisfactory drill participation on 000715 and 000716, via letter (certified receipt #Z371753809 sent on 000717). Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

000715:  Commanding Officer notified the Applicant via letter (certified receipt #Z371753809 sent on 000717) of intent for administrative reduction for unsatisfactory participation in the selected Marine Corps Reserve. Applicant is encouraged to submit a written statement on his behalf, to include any family hardship, personal hardship (i.e., civilian employment, education, etc.), or medical problems that have precluded his attendance at drills.

000716:  Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (Unauthorized absences on the following dates: 000610 and 000611.), necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued. Applicant not available for signature.

000719:  Applicant signed receipt and accepted delivery of the certified mail, receipt #Z371753809.

000720:  Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (Unauthorized absences on the following dates: 000715 and 000716.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued. Applicant not available for signature.

000731:  Administrative Reduction Order for Unsatisfactory Participation in the Selected Marine Corps Reserve. Applicant is administratively reduced to Private First Class due to unsatisfactory participation, specifically, failure to attend scheduled drills and annual training while a member of the Selected Marine Corps Reserve.

000811:  Commanding Officer/Inspector-Instructor, Ammunition Company (-), Greenville, recommended to Commander, Marine Forces Reserve (SJA), that the Applicant be discharged with an under other than honorable conditions by reason of unsatisfactory participation in the ready reserve for UNEXCUSED absences from scheduled drills. Commanding Officer’s comments: “Private First Class K_ (Applicant) is in an unsatisfactory drill status having missed and not attempted to make up 15 drills. Private First Class K_ (Applicant) joined the Marine Corps on 15 July 1998 and his unit on 19 December 1998 and has been in an unsatisfactory drill status since 4 May 2000. Private First Class K_ (Applicant) continues to show contempt towards his contractual obligations to the Marine Corps Reserve. His unwillingness to make-up missed drills and the unlikelihood of his presence at future drills make him an extreme liability to the morale and success of this unit. Private First Class K_ (Applicant) has no future mobilization potential. We mailed his letter of Notification, Acknowledgement of Rights Form and NDRB Form 13 June 2000, it was received and signed for, but SNM did not return it in time indicated. Private First Class K_ (Applicant) has no potential for future military service, he does not possess a security clearance or have access to classified material.”

001003:  Commanding Officer, 4 th Supply Battalion, recommended approval of the Commanding Officer, Ammunition Company, recommendation for the Applicant’s administrative discharge.

001031:  Commanding General, 4 th Force Service Support Group, recommended approval of Commanding Officer, Ammunition Company recommendation for the Applicant’s administrative discharge.

010110:  SJA statement on a copy of the Acknowledgement of Rights that the Applicant failed to return the Acknowledgement of Respondent’s Rights sent to the Applicant on 000612, as an enclosure to certified mail #Z371753792.

010129:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

010129:  Commander, Marine Forces Reserve, notified the Commandant of the Marine Corps, that the Applicant will be discharged with under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve.

010202:  Commanding Officer, Ammunition Company (-), Greenville, letter to Commander, Marine Forces Reserve (SJA). Applicant was discharged on 2 February 2001 by reason of failure to participate (Reserve not on active duty, board waived) with a characterization of service of Under Other Than Honorable Conditions.

 040628:  NDRB documentary record review Docket Number MD04-00166 conducted. Determination: discharge proper and equitable; relief not warranted.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20010202 by reason of unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve (A, B, and C) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

The Applicant contends that he was an outstanding Marine. When the service of a member of the U.S. Marine Corps Reserve has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. During May – June 2000, t he Applicant’s service was marred by eleven unexcused absences from scheduled drill with his reserve unit. On each of the days that the Applicant did not attend drill, his unit called his residence, for a total of 7 times, speaking to him on 4 occasions. In addition, on 3 occasions, the Applicant’s Commanding Officer notified him of his unsatisfactory drill participation via certified mail, which was received at the Applicant’s residence. Further, the Applicant received 3 retention warnings, was not recommended for promotion on 2 occasions, and was issued an administrative reduction order to Private First Class for unsatisfactory participation while a member of the Selected Marine Corps Reserve. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Marine Corps Reserve and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.
The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge, may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. In his testimony the Applicant stated that he was an active member in his church and community, and that he was currently employed. The Applicant provided three letters of character reference and his fiance made a statement to the Board on his behalf. While the Board was encouraged by the Applicant’s testimony, the Applicant failed to provide verifiable proof of his post service accomplishments. As explained to the Applicant in the response from his NDRB documentary discharge review of 20040628, the Applicant could have produced evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a verifiable employment record, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities, in order for consideration for relief based on post-service conduct. The Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of post service character and conduct to mitigate the misconduct that resulted in his characterization of discharge. Therefore, no relief will be granted.

The following is provided for the edification of the Applicant. The Applicant has exhausted his opportunities for review by the NDRB. The Applicant may, however, petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100, concerning a change in the characterization of naval service, if he desires further review of his case.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6213 of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 1995 until 31 Aug 2001.

B. Marine Corps Reserve Administrative Management Manual, MCO P1001R.1, Chapter 3, Reserve Participation and Administrative Procedures, paragraph 300.

C. Table 6-1 of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95, Guide for Characterization of Service.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .


PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy    Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00166

    Original file (MD04-00166.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00166 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031030. Conduct: None found in record. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.000719: Commanding officer notified the Applicant of unsatisfactory drill participation via certified letter.000719: Letter of intent to administratively separate under other than honorable conditions for the failure to participate in reserve training was...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500315

    Original file (MD0500315.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION At the time of recruitment, the applicant indicated that the maiden name of his mother as A_ C_ O_, and listed the full name of his father as J_ R. C_ i , who were legally married in the State of Tennessee at the time of the applicant’s enlistment. The applicant’s mother and father separated later in the fall of 1991.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600672

    Original file (MD0600672.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Private First Class B_ (Applicant) has stated to HM2 H_, “That I have no desire to return to the unit and remain in the Marine Corps.” HM2 P_ had told Private First Class B_ (Applicant) the way to correct his deficiencies through his chain of command and that if he did not then a list of consequences was given to him under the references (a) and (b). Private First Class B_ (Applicant) did not show up for the May drill and was given Unexcused for those drills. It is requested that Private...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01268

    Original file (MD02-01268.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-01268 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020906, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation Only the service and medical records were reviewed, as the Applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board to consider. Marines in this unit have made numerous attempts to contact Private A_ (Applicant) and try to bring him into a satisfactory drilling status with this unit.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600141

    Original file (MD0600141.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Financially I have been left with helping my parents pay their bills, & putting my little brothers through school.”000605: Ltr of unsat participation in the SMCR for drills missed on 000603 and 000604 mailed to SNM’s PMA this date.000607: Applicant administratively reduced in rank for unsatisfactory performance of Reserve training,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600719

    Original file (MD0600719.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). PART I - ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Decisional Issues Equity: Isolated incident. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501388

    Original file (MD0501388.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Marine Corps Reserve and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600578

    Original file (MD0600578.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” 001130: Applicantinformed via letter of administrative reduction to Private First Class due to unsatisfactory participation and or performance of Reserve training, specifically, failure to attend scheduled drills and/or annual training while a member of the Selected Marine Corps Reserve.010116: SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.010116: Commander, Marine Forces Reserve, directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of failure to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00915

    Original file (MD01-00915.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I am requesting that a change be made to the characterization of my discharge due to the fact that I left my unit in the face of injustice. 970606: Letter of intent to administratively separate under other than honorable conditions for the failure to participate in reserve training was sent via certified mail, return receipt requested. The Board found no evidence of racism against the applicant in a review of his service records.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600256

    Original file (MD0600256.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Every time I was notified of drill, I called my Unit and informed the Navy Doc of my medical status i.e. that my back was still hurt and I had not had surgery because the doctors would not perform it. ]980807: Applicant absent from 1 drill,unexcused.980807: Commanding Officer/Inspector Instructor, Headquarters and Service Company, 1 st Battalion, 25 th Marines, 4 th Marine Division signs Notification of Separation Proceedings advising Applicant of intended recommendation for discharge by...