Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500889
Original file (MD0500889.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-Pvt USMC
Docket No. MD05-00889

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20050425. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a personal appearance hearing before the Board in the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan area. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. Th e Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

 Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20050825. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case an impropriety in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was 4-1 that the discharge and the reason for discharge shall change to: HONORABLE/COMPLETION OF REQUIRED ACTIVE SERVICE, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 1005, Separation Code “JBK1.”


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

 “I would like a upgrade because I want to go into law enforcement. When I was younger, I was easily influenced and made some bad choices. Now that I am older I have become my own man and make wiser choices. I have a family to take care of, a steady job, and attend church on a regular basis. It makes me sad to know that we are in a war and I could never be called back in to fight for my country or wear my uniform again. I have always wanted to be a police officer and help young people not to make the mistake I have made. I would like to feel proud again and call myself a genuine Marine. ”


Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214
Ltr from Hewitt Police Department, dtd June 3, 2005
Employment Character Reference ltr from S_ B_, dtd May 26, 2005
 Character Reference ltr from B_ E_, pastor, dtd May 25, 2005

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USMCR (DEP)    19930416 – 19930607      COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 19930608             Date of Discharge: 19970814

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

 Active: 04 01 02                           (Excludes lost time)
          Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: 9 days
         Confinement:              27 days

 Age at Entry: 19

 Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 58

 Highest Rank: LCpl                                  MOS: 0352

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.2 (11)                      Conduct: 4.1 (11)

 Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as stated on the DD Form 214) : Rifle Expert Badge (3 rd award), Pistol Sharpshooter Badge, National Defense Service Medal, Letter of Appreciation (3 rd award), Meritorious Mast




Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):
UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/ MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

Undated:         Pre-service waiver for morals (minor in possession of a handgun) requested.

Undated:         Applicant briefed on and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs. [Extracted from undated request for waiver for morals].
951103:  Applicant enrolled into Formal After care. [Extracted from CSACC ltr dtd 960123]
960123:  Applicant released from CSACC Continuing Care program as a treatment failure due to unexcused missed sessions. [Extracted from CSACC ltr dtd 960123]

960207:  Applicant to unauthorized absence, 0700 960207.

960216:  Applicant from unauthorized absence, 0700 960216.

960306:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Did on or about 0700, 960207, w/o authority, absent himself from his appointed place of duty and did remain so absent until on or about 0700, 960216.
         Award: Forfeiture of $220.00 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 14 days. Forfeiture suspended for 6 months. Not appealed.

960416:  Acknowledged understanding of eligibility but non-recommendation for promotion to Cpl for the month of May due to recent NJP. Applicant chose not to make a statement.

960502:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (Loss of DD Form 2MD U.S. Armed Forces Identification Card and failure to maintain military grooming standards/personal appearance), necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
970225:  NAVDRUGLAB, San Diego, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 970214, tested positive for amphetamine/methamphetamine.
970424:  Acknowledged understanding of eligibility but non-recommendation for promotion to Cpl due to poor judgment/awaiting NJP. Applicant chose not to make a statement.

970528:  Acknowledged understanding of eligibility but non-recommendation for promotion to Cpl due positive urinalysis, poor judgment. Applicant chose not to make a statement.

970610:  Summary Court-Martial.
         Charge: violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a:
         Specification: Wrongful use of amphetamine/methamphetamine.
          Finding: to Charge and the specification thereunder, guilty.
          Sentence: 30 days confinement, forfeiture of $600.00 pay per month for 1 month, reduced to E-1.
         CA action, undated: Sentence approved and ordered executed.

970630:  Acknowledged understanding of eligibility but non-recommendation for promotion to Cpl for July, August and September 1997 due to recent court-martial resulting in reduction to PVT and a lack of discipline. Applicant not able to sign acknowledgment due to confinement.

970707:  Applicant released from confinement.

970709:  Applicant refused medical officer’s evaluation.
970710:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions by reason of drug abuse. The factual basis for the recommendation is the Applicant’s wrongful use of a controlled substance.
970710:  Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel, elected to waive all rights.

970711:  Commanding Officer, 1 st Marines, 1 st Marine Division, recommended to Commanding General, 1 st Marine Division, Applicant’s under other than honorable conditions discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

970717:  GCMCA, Commanding General, 1 st Marine Division (Reinforced), directed the Applicant's under other than honorable conditions discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

970718:  Applicant voluntarily agreed to remain on active duty until 970814.

970814:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19970814 by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (A) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was improper (B).

The Applicant enlisted on 19930608 for a period of four years, thus establishing an expiration of active service obligation (EAOS) of 19970607, which was subsequently extended to 19970622 due to nine days of unauthorized absence and six days of lost time due to confinement. The Applicant was notified of his Commanding Officer’s intention to administratively separate the Applicant on 19970710. The discharge was directed on 19970717 and became effective on 19970814. Regulations prohibit holding a member beyond the expiration of active service obligation for processing due to misconduct. Since the Applicant was not processed for administrative separation prior to his release from confinement on 19970707, he should have been discharged by reason of expiration of active service upon his release from confinement. Because the Board found the Applicant’s voluntary extension on 19970718 to have occurred after the Applicant should have already been discharged, the Board found the Applicant’s agreement to extend his enlistment to be suspect. As such, the Board voted to change the Applicant’s narrative reason for separation to “Expiration of Active Service Obligation.” In considering the characterization, the Board considered the Applicant’s characterization under the context of discharges as a result of expiration of required service. Under these regulations, explicit instruction indicates that characterization for Marines with proficiency and conduct marks above 3.0/4.0 respectively will be “honorable.” As such, the Board voted to upgrade the Applicant’s character of service to honorable. Relief granted.


 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 31 Jan 97 until 31 August 2001.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .


PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy    Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501493

    Original file (MD0501493.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, falls well below that required for an upgrade in characterization of service.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500915

    Original file (MD0500915.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Mandatory processing for separation is required for Marines who abuse illegal drugs. At this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of post service character and conduct to mitigate the misconduct that resulted in his characterization of discharge.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501386

    Original file (MD0501386.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Commanding Officer’s comments: “Lance Corporal J_(Applicant) was convicted on 13 August 2002 on felony charges of drug possession and sentenced to pay a $500.00 fine and serve 1 year on probation. The Applicant’s service was marred by nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violation of Article 112a (wrongful use, possession of controlled...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00817

    Original file (MD00-00817.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00817 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000614, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to Secretarial Authority. The Board did find several discrepancies in the service record concerning the applicant’s counselings, which became the justification for the applicant’s characterization of general (under honorable conditions). The applicant states in her personal...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00951

    Original file (MD99-00951.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :960207: Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct, specifically violation of Article 89 UCMJ, disrespect Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.960209: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 128: On or about 0615, 9 Feb 96 assaulted LCPL C_ by striking him with a closed fist. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501065

    Original file (MD0501065.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION st Marine Division directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501389

    Original file (MD0501389.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Sep. Board. 040901: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to commission of a serious offense, that such misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge with a general (under honorable conditions) characterization of service.040917: Applicant from confinement. In the course of reviewing the Applicant’s service record, transcript of the administrative discharge...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501122

    Original file (MD0501122.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “Convenience of the government & reenlistment code change to RE-1.” The Applicant requests a personal appearance discharge review before a traveling panel closest to Honolulu, HI. st Marine Expeditionary Brigade directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500791

    Original file (MD0500791.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    My record of promotions showed I was generally a good service member - (A92.12). Statement: In accordance with 32 CFR 724, and SECNAVINST 5420.173D, the Veterans of Foreign Wars submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) the above issue and following statement in supplement to the Applicant’s petition. The Applicant contends that his record of promotions showed he was a good service member and that the incidents that lead to his discharge were out of character.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500660

    Original file (MD0500660.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD05-00660 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050302. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 19970305 - 19970427 COG Active: USMC 19970428 - 20001003 HON Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 20001004 Date of Discharge: 20021113 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 01 10 (Does not exclude lost...