Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500818
Original file (MD0500818.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-PVT, USMC
Docket No. MD05-00818

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20050407. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “RE Code.” The Applicant requests a personal appearance hearing discharge review before the Board in the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan area. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20051102. After a thorough review of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character and narrative reason for discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application and from an attached document/letter to the Board:

“I would like to re-enter the Marine Corps.”

“To:      Whom it May Concern

My name is J_ P. D_, I am a UNITED STATES MARINE. That title means everything to me, its what my fathers sweat, bled, and fought for. It’s a title that I sweat, bled, and fought for. Ever since I was 5 years old, when I first put my fathers cammies on I knew what I was supposed to do in life, and that was to be a UNITED STATES MARINE, and I am. I was young and immature when I went in at the age of 18. I know there’s no excuse for my actions, but I have dealt with that. I am a better person today because of yesterday. I have gone to rehab on my own and I have a clean and sober life today. I have waited for the right time to ask for your help in changing my discharge. The only reason I would like to change my discharge is so I can carry out my mission in life, and that is to serve in the UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS. I was wrong for taking cocaine, I tried it once and I will never do it again. Being a Marine is the only thing I ever wanted, just like my dad. I let a lot of people down in my short life, but my dad told me once “a Marine never quits”, and I don’t plan to quit.

The question you’re asking yourself is why should we overturn the OTH (other than honorable) to a honorable discharge? I plan to better myself as well as other Marines in my unit, I am aware of signs of drug abuse I been there myself. I know I’m a lifer, I really would love another chance to serve my country, but most of all my CORPS.

If given this chance I would be a model Marine and give nothing less than 110%. I know I can’t expect to go back in, but I can pray and I wont quit.

[signed]
J. P. D____
UNITED STATES MARINE”
Applicant’s Remarks: “I would also like for my Re-Entry Code to be changed to allow me to go back Active Duty in the Marine Corp”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Letter from Mrs. A_ D_, undated (3 pgs)
Letter from J_ P. D_ III, CWO4, USMC, RET, dtd March 14, 2005
Letter from J_ D_, dtd March 20, 2005
Letter of Recommendation from B. L. J_, 1stLt USMC, dtd March 15, 2005
Letter from C_ P_, HMCM USN Fleet Marine Force Retired, undated
Letter from D_ E. J_, HMCS(FMF), USN, Ret, dtd March 8, 2005 (2 pgs)
Photograph of Marine

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USMCR (DEP)    20001017 – 20001127               COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 20001128             Date of Discharge: 20020131

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

 Active: 01 02 03
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: none
         Confinement:              none

 Age at Entry: 19

 Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 35

 Highest Rank: PFC                                   MOS: 0311 (8 mos) 8152 (6 mos)

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: NA*                  Conduct: NA*

 Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as stated on the DD Form 214): Rifle Sharpshooter Badge, Pistol Sharpshooter Badge.

*Not Available


 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):
UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

001003:  Applicant briefed on and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
001017:  Waivers granted for adjudicated law violations of serious offense(s) (district level) and marijuana drug involvement not considered a law violation.

010905:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: On or about 0300, 18 Aug 01, did at 1 st FASTCo, MCSFBn, Norfolk, Virginia, violate a lawful general regulation, to wit: COMNAVREDMIDLANT/SOPA (ADMIN) HRINST 5400.1 dtd 20 Mar 00, by consuming alcohol under the legal drinking age.
         Award: Forfeiture of $521 per month for 2 months, restriction for 60 days, reduction to E-1. Not appealed.

010905:  Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (NJP held on 010905 for violation(s) of Article 92 of the UCMJ), necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

010905:  Acknowledged understanding of eligibility but not recommended for promotion to PFC for 6 months due to NJP held on 010905. Applicant chose not to make a statement.

010921:  Applicant discharged from Addictions Rehabilitation Department as a result of noncompliance. [Extracted from counseling entry dated 011114.]

011114:  Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (Your release from level III treatment at the Addictions Rehabilitation Department (ARD) on 21 Sept 2001. You were discharged from treatment as a result of noncompliance with program rules and regulations. Specifically, you were disruptive during classes, you displayed a poor attitude, and you were involved in a physical altercation with another service member attending said named course.) Sources of assistance provided, advised being processed for administrative separation.

011214:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: On or about 4 Dec 01, wrongfully used a controlled substance to wit: Cocaine, identified through NAVDRUGLAB msg 111520Z Dec 01.
 Award: Forfeiture of $521 per month for 2 months, restriction for 60 days. Not appealed.
020102:  Applicant evaluated by substance abuse counselor. [Extracted from counseling dated 020107.]

020107:  Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (Illegal drug involvement (Cocaine usage identified through urinalysis confirmed by Navy Drug Lab JAXFL msg 111520z Dec 01)). Advised being processed for administrative separation.

020107:  Acknowledged understanding of eligibility but not recommended for promotion to PFC for 18 months due to positive confirmation of illegal drug usage. Applicant chose not to make a statement.

020107:  Counseled concerning eligibility for substance abuse treatment. Acknowledged that such treatment is available at the local Veterans Assistance (VA) Office closest to place of residence after separation.

020131:  DD214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, board waived.

Service Record Book did not contain the Administrative Discharge package.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20020131 by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (E).

 When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by two nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violations of Articles 92 and 112a of the UCMJ. The Applicant’s violations of Articles 92 and 112a are considered serious offenses. The Applicant was given a retention warning on 20010905 and discharged from Addictions Rehabilitation Department (ARD) Level III treatement as a result of noncompliance. The Applicant’s discharge from ARD was due, in part, to a physical altercation with another service member enrolled in the program. The Applicant’s conduct is considered a violation of the special consideration given the Applicant as evidenced by the Applicant’s enlistment waivers for adjudicated serious violations and marijuana drug involvement. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the Marine Corps and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

The Applicant contends that he has a “clean and sober life” and that he has undergone rehabilitation. There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded, based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient post-service documentation for the Board to consider. Relief on the basis of post service conduct is not warranted.

Regarding the Applicant’s request to change his RE-Code, the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces and the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F, effective
01 Sep 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT.
B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 92, failure to obey and order/regulation and Article 112a, wrongful use of a controlled substance.

 C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .
E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy    Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501420

    Original file (MD0501420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). After I told the men in my command that I had taken the drugs. The NDRB advises that there was no impropriety in his administrative separation for misconduct due to drug abuse, despite the evidence of record showing that the Applicant’s test result came back negative for controlled substances.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500996

    Original file (MD0500996.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD05-00996 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050524. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence for more than 30 days, and Article 95, escape from...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501386

    Original file (MD0501386.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Commanding Officer’s comments: “Lance Corporal J_(Applicant) was convicted on 13 August 2002 on felony charges of drug possession and sentenced to pay a $500.00 fine and serve 1 year on probation. The Applicant’s service was marred by nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violation of Article 112a (wrongful use, possession of controlled...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600309

    Original file (ND0600309.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “ MDB.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. Thank You So Much & Happy HolidayApplicant) ” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Service 7) (3 copies)Character Reference ltr...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600248

    Original file (MD0600248.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    If I am successful I getting my discharge upgraded to honorable and my reinlistment code upgraded I would really consider going back into active duty.”Additional issues submitted by Applicant’s counsel/representative (Disabled American Veterans): “Dear Chairperson: After a review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of evidence assembled for review, we continue to note the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600032

    Original file (MD0600032.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    [Extracted from DD Form 2807-1 dated 040407].040322: Commanding Officer, VMFA-321 recommended the Applicant’s under other than honorable conditions discharge by reason of misconduct due to pattern of misconduct. Based upon supporting documentation, the administrative discharge board found that a preponderance of the evidence supported the Applicant’s misconduct and recommended separation under other than honorable conditions. On 20040322, the Commanding Officer, VMFA 321, recommended to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600473

    Original file (MD0600473.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Now I ask that the country I love honor my service with an Honorable Discharge from the United States Marine Corps. PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20010216 - 20011126 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 20011127 Date of Discharge: 20031121 Length of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600172

    Original file (MD0600172.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD06-00172 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20051101. I was eventually arrested for the unauthorized absence from work and spent several months in the Brig. Violation of UCMJ Article 92: Specification: On or about 031003, LCpl D_ (Applicant) was ordered to stay in the barracks and violated said order.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600027

    Original file (MD0600027.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant informed that if she is separated with a characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions, she will be administratively reduced to pay grade E-3 upon separation.040527: Applicant acknowledged understanding of supplemental notification of separation proceedings.040713: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that such misconduct...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501231

    Original file (MD0501231.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). I had a very good service record and I believe I received the type of discharge I did as an example to the other Marines I was stationed with on Okinawa.I contend that, given my overall honorable service, that I should have at a minimum been afforded the rights of someone who was abusing illegal mind-altering drugs; I understand that drug...