Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500659
Original file (MD0500659.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PVT, USMC
Docket No. MD05-00659

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20050302. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20050620. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

Applicant’s issues, as stated:

1. “I received a less than honorable discharge from the United States Marines on Feb. 12 1999. I had served honorably for over 3 years before I made some stupid mistakes. I admitted my guilt and took my punishment in the brig while others in the group at the time denied guilt and got legal counsel to represent them. Prior to the drug abuse, I had received a good conduct medal and other medals and awards. National Defense Service Medal, Letter of Appreciation 2d Awd, Sea Service Deployment Ribbon, Armed Forces Service Medal, and Rifle Sharpshooter Badge. Since leaving the Marines I have been steady employed. I worked as manager of Ridge Risher Mountain Bike stores for over 2 years in Fayetteville and Beckley West Virginia until the owners sold the business. I then went to school to earn my C.D.L.. I presently work as a self-employed owner operator.
I am now a mature adult who regrets past mistakes. I ask for a second chance.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214
Character Reference Letter from D__ E___ (not dated)
Character Reference Letter from M__ R. A___ (2) (not dated)
Character Reference Letter from P___ G___, U.S.A., retired (not dated)
Reference Letter from CPT J___ M. A___, U.S.A. (not dated)
Criminal Record Information with cover letter dated October 15, 2004 (3 pages)
Driving Record Information with cover letter dated October 15, 2004 (3 pages)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                950221 - 951022  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 951023               Date of Discharge: 990212

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 03 20
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 45

 Highest Rank: LCpl                         MOS: 1833

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.0 (9)                       Conduct: 4.0 (9)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, LOA(2), SSDR, AFSM, NM, RSB, GCM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

950221:  Initial enlistment contract documents admission of pre-service marijuana experimentation. Enlistment waiver granted. Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
971123:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Alcohol related incident which resulted in suspension/revocation of base driving privileges from 971125 to 980107.] Sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

981109:  NAVDRUGLAB Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 981027, tested positive for cocaine.
981117:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Conviction by Onslow County, NC authorities for DWI (.11 BAC) on 980107. SNM received suspended/revoked driving privileges for one year and ordered to pay $80.00 court cost.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

981119:  Summary Court-Martial.
         Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a.
         Specification: Did at Charlie Company, 2d Assault Amphibious Battalion, 2d Marine Division, on or about 981010, wrongfully use a controlled substance, specifically, cocaine.
         Finding: to Charge I and the specification thereunder, guilty.
         Sentence: Forfeiture of $617.00 pay per month for 1 month, reduced to E-1, confinement for 30 days.
         CA action 981119: Sentence approved and will be executed.
981215:  Clinical Director, Alcohol Treatment Facility, Naval Hospital Substance Abuse evaluation indicates applicant was diagnosed as a drug abuser (isolated incident). Recommended for administrative processing.

981215:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
981215:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.

981215:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

990201:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

990208:  Commanding General, 2d Marine Division, II Marine Expeditionary Force, directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19990212 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member's conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member's military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by two retention warnings, a civil conviction for driving while impaired and a summary court-martial conviction for violating Article 112a of the UCMJ. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the Marine Corps and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs, specifically cocaine. Mandatory processing for separation is required for Marines who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.

Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have occurred during the discharge process for the period of enlistment in question. The Board discovered no impropriety after a review of Applicant’s case. There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded, based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, documentation of community service and credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation for the Board to consider. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 31 Jan 97 until 31 August 2001.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy    Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00937

    Original file (MD00-00937.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00937 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000724, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Board will not grant relief on the basis of this issue.In response to applicant’s issue 2, concerning a change in reenlistment code, the NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reentry into the naval service or any other of the Armed Forces. Relief is therefore...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600174

    Original file (MD0600174.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The member has not received any received any pain relief or increase in physical endurance despite eighteen months of rehabilitation while on a limited duty board. 011106: Applicant’s counsel, Capt M. A. C_, USMC, submits letter of deficiency in the Administrative Discharge Board to Commanding General, 2d Force Service Support Group, alleging that the Board improperly admitted into evidence and considered “Counseling Sheets” over counsel’s objection in violation of the Marine Corps’...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00105

    Original file (ND04-00105.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-SR, USN Docket No. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). At this time, the Applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider an upgrade.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500205

    Original file (ND0500205.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    TH to NCIS agents running through my flat.Before I left for Jebel Ali, a friend of mine, BM2 C___ A___ had been involved with dealing and using ecstasy, which I had no knowledge of. I asked him to watch my flat while I was Jebel Ali until he left Bahrain. They would not let him change his statement and told it would jeopardize his deal with the prosecution.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501498

    Original file (MD0501498.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 4) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20030331 – 20030427 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 20030428 Date of Discharge: 20050128 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 09 00 (Does not include lost time.) ...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500616

    Original file (MD0500616.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Thank you R_ K. Y_ (Applicant)” The record indicates that the Applicant received a disciplinary and discharge warning on 20000124 for being diagnosed with a personality disorder.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600493

    Original file (MD0600493.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD06-00493 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20060214. Mandatory processing for separation is required for Marines who abuse illegal drugs. The Applicant’s allegations, that he was denied assistance and counseling for his personal problems, do not refute the presumption of regularity in this case.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600501

    Original file (MD0600501.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I recommend that he be separated under other than honorable characterization of service. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post-service documentation for the Board to consider. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600508

    Original file (MD0600508.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The cigar contained the marijuana that the Cpl had purchased, but me being the driver was charged with possession. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case,the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (B and C).The Applicant states, “I request that my characterization of discharge be changed to honorable because I believe that I served honorably in the Marine Corps, also there were several injustices that have...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200349

    Original file (MD1200349.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : After...