Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500181
Original file (MD0500181.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT




ex-PFC, USMC
Docket No. MD05-00181

Applicant’s Request

The application for discharge review was received on 20041103. The Applicant requested the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a documentary record review. The Applicant did not list a representative on her DD Form 293.


Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20050118. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/PERSONALITY DISORDER, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6203.3




PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues, as stated

Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“1. I have been a good citizen since discharge. I volunteer at Lincoln City Rehabilitation Center. I help seniors with activities, play games & visit with them & help feed those who can’t feed themselves. I am also in training to become a certified nurse’s assistant .

2. Personal problems impaired my ability to serve. A week after I was married my husband went to Iraq. He was there 8 months, came home for 5 months, then was re-deployed to Iraq for another 7 months.

3. Medical or physical problems impaired my ability to serve. I suffered from severe depression, anorexia & bulimia due to stress of my husband’s deployment. I had a hard time adjusting to our separation.

4. Certain other problems impaired my ability to serve. I had 2 very close relatives pass away while I was away from home. I felt very guilty that I couldn’t come home for the funerals and support my family. It added to my depression.

Note: I ordered a copy of my service personnel file. It was sent to me on CD. I was unable to open it, as was the veteran service officer and a couple of close friends. I could not print out a copy to send to you. I will send you the CD if you need it. See Attached Request.”

Documentation

In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:

Applicant’s DD Form 214
Military Personnel Records request (2 pages)


PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):

         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR (J)               010911 - 020101  COG

Period of Service Under Review :

Date of Enlistment: 020102               Date of Discharge: 030811

Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 07 10
         Inactive: None

Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 42

Highest Rank: PFC                          MOS: 3381 (Food Service Specialist)

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

Proficiency: NMF*                          Conduct: NMF

Military Decorations: None

Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM

Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

*No Marks Found in service record book.

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/PERSONALITY DISORDER, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6203.3.

Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

010911:  Initial enlistment contract documents admission of pre-service marijuana experimentation. Enlistment waiver was granted. Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.


030116:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Assignment to the Marine Corps Body Composition Program.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

030701:  Medical evaluation by a military
psychiatrist concluded that the Applicant’s personality disorder was so severe that her ability to function effectively in the military environment was significantly impaired. She was diagnosed with a Personality Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified, with Dependent and Borderline Features. Associated behaviors, which rendered the Applicant unsuitable for further military service, included “a potential danger to self.”

030718:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder as evidenced by psychiatric evaluation and her inability to function within her command as well as presenting a danger to herself.

030718:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder as evidenced by psychological evaluation. The factual basis for this recommendation was her inability to function within her command as well as presenting a danger to herself demonstrating she was unsuitable for further service.

030719:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

030806:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

030806:  GCMCA [Commanding General, 2d Marine Division] directed the Applicant's discharge under honorable conditions (general) for convenience of the government due to a personality disorder.


PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20030811 general (under honorable conditions) for convenience of the government due to a personality disorder (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

Issue 1: T
here is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities, are examples of verifiable documents that should be provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. At this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient verifiable documentation of good character and conduct to mitigate her misconduct while on active duty. Relief denied.

Issues 2 - 4:
While the Applicant may feel her husband’s deployment cycle to Iraq, missing the funerals of a few close relatives and her depression related health problems were a contributing factors to her separation from the service, the fact remains, she was diagnosed with a "Personality Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified with dependant and borderline features" by the division Psychiatrist at the Office of the Division Psychiatrist, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina and was recommended for expeditious administrative separation from the United States Marine Corps. The Board finds the Reason for Discharge reflects the Applicant's mental health status at the time of her separation form the service, and considers her discharge to have been proper and equitable at the time of issuance. "Personality Disorder" is an accurate narrative description of the reason for the Applicant's discharge. After a complete review of the available records, including the evidence submitted by the Applicant, and the adverse counseling entry (Page 11), the Board found that the Applicant’s characterization of discharge was appropriate. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

A. Paragraph 6203, CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 02 Sep 01 until Present.

B. Table 6-1, Guide for Characterization of Service, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 until Present.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .



PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT


If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at http://Boards.law.af.mil” .

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00372

    Original file (MD02-00372.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00372 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020211, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. “In light of recent events (i.e., 2 suicides and 2 suicide attempts in the 2d Marine Division and a suicide in the 2d Force Service Support Group), expediting this service member's separation package is recommended.”941129: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under honorable conditions (general)...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01349

    Original file (MD04-01349.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    6203.3 PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION [Applicant]. The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits not the Naval Discharge Review Board.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600140

    Original file (MD0600140.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “Due to Convenience of the Government.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The pressure is tearing me apart emotionally and I feel that separation from the Marine Corps is my last and only alternative.” 950112: Medical evaluation by R_ A. A_, LCDR, MC USN. The Applicant's DD Form 214, Block 28, narrative reason for separation, indicates she was separated by reason of personality disorder.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500729

    Original file (MD0500729.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD05-00729 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050321. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Reenlistment policy of the Marine Corps is promulgated by the Commandant, United States Marine Corps, Code MMEA, 3280 Russell Road, Quantico, VA 22134.

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00618

    Original file (MD00-00618.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Partner relational problem AXIS II: Personality disorder, not otherwise specified, with dependent and antisocial features.980226: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder as evidenced by psychiatric evaluation.980226: Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00920

    Original file (MD00-00920.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    psychiatrist as borderline personality disorder referred to in notice of intent (personality disorder) not found in service or medical records.950123: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for honorable discharge for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder as evidenced by psychiatric evaluation.950124: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600797

    Original file (MD0600797.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Recommendations: In accordance with Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, Chapter 6, Section 2, the attending psychiatrist strongly recommends consideration of administrative separation on the basis of personality disorder of such severity her ability to function effectively in the military environment was significantly impaired.971020: Applicant notified of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501500

    Original file (MD0501500.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    My name is M_ P_ H_ P_(Applicant). th Marines, Camp Lejeune, NC, recommended Applicant’s honorable discharge by reason of personality disorder. Private First Class P_(Applicant) received Battalion NJP on 18 March 2004 for Articles 92, 111 and 123.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00328

    Original file (MD04-00328.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. I had to sell my house for $16,000.00 less than I had paid for it in order to pay off some of my debts.” Documentation Applicant did not submit any documentation for the Board to consider. At this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient verifiable documentation of good character and conduct for the Board to consider with regard to his discharge characterization.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00076

    Original file (MD01-00076.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. I have since then been diagnosed as not having a personality disorder. Accordingly, partial relief is granted.The Board carefully considered the applicant’s request for an upgrade to Honorable by reason of Convenience of the Government, and found that other than his diagnosis of Personality disorder with suicidal ideation, the applicant had no adverse marks in his service record.