Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01364
Original file (ND04-01364.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-AR, USN
Docket No. ND04-01364

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20040902. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). The Applicant requests a documentary record review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20041222. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“Issue #1. My discharge is improper because, my recruiter, (at Cortana Mall Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70816) told me that when I got to my “A” school, I could request to be tested for “ADD” and or “ADHD.” I did not know that this information had to be in my contract. At my “A” school, (Pensacola, FL.) the medical doctors refused to test me, nor would they allow Tri-Care medical benefits to cover the test. At my own will and self-judgment, I paid for the test by a local doctor and psychologists. I was awarded an other than honorable discharge, and I feel I was neglected and used. That is my issue. If you need more information Sir or Mama, please contact me, and I will be more than happy to get the information to you. Thank you for your time.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     020726 - 021028  COG
         Active:                            None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 021029               Date of Discharge: 030701

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 08 03
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4 (24 months extension)

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 46

 Highest Rate: AR

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NOB*                 Behavior: 2.00(1)                 OTA: 2.00

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

*Not observed

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

030521:  Applicant diagnosed as Axis I: Malingering. The clinical impression is that the member is not mentally ill but manifests a pattern of character and behavior which is of such severity as to render the individual incapable of serving adequately in the Navy. Based on the history gathered by the NATTC Mental Health Department, AR B_’s main focus is on getting discharged from the Navy by making multiple medical complaints to avoid duty and by deliberate use of illicit drugs. Furthermore the member acknowledged deliberate failure to disclose his history of alcohol and drug use and psychiatric history upon enlistment.

030523:  NAVDRUGLAB Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received on 030520, tested positive for amphetamine and cocaine.
030528:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 83: Fraudulent enlistment, violation of UCMJ, Article 112a (2 Specs): Wrongful use of a controlled substance.
         Award: Forfeiture of $575.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
030626:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with a least favorable characterization of under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse and by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense.

030626:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27(b), elected to waive all rights.
030626:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Commanding Officer’s comments (verbatim): “Airman Recruit B_ was confirmed positive for the use of amphetamine and cocaine through urinalysis testing by Naval Drug Laboratory, Jacksonville, FL [citation omitted]. He also perpetrated a fraudulent enlistment when he failed to disclose alcohol and drug use as well as psychiatric treatment prior to entry into the naval service…”

030626:  Commander, Naval Personnel Development Command, directed the Applicant's discharge as under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20030701 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1: Normally, to permit relief, an impropriety or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such impropriety or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. The Applicant contends that he tested positive for amphetamine, a drug prescribed to him by a local doctor. Despite the Applicant’s contentions, t here is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. The record contains statements by the Applicant detailing his illicit drug use in an effort to be discharged from the military. Furthermore, the record contains evidence that the Applicant tested positive for cocaine in addition to amphetamine. Mandatory processing for separation is required for sailors who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. Clearly, the evidence of record demonstrates that the Applicant was responsible for his conduct and that he should be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.

The Applicant implies that his misconduct was the result of feeling used and neglected over alleged misrepresentations by his recruiter. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that the recruiter misled him through the recruitment process. The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case. However, even if the Applicant could show misrepresentations in the recruitment process, such misrepresentations would neither amount to a justification nor to a defense for the Applicant’s own misconduct. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.






Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 Aug 2002 until Present, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01081

    Original file (ND03-01081.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01363

    Original file (ND04-01363.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). I was wrongfully accused and convicted of using drugs, although I had taken several urinalysis tests during my 30 plus months of service. There is no requirement that such evidence take the form of a positive urinalysis.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00221

    Original file (ND03-00221.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00221 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20021113, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 010830 - 010925 COG Active:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00543

    Original file (ND01-00543.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of Good Conduct Award Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 970221 - 970226 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 970227 Date of Discharge: 000505 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 03 02 09 Inactive: 00 00 00 ...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00383

    Original file (ND00-00383.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00383 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000204, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to Convenience of the Government. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly Article 3630620.The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214. PART I - APPLICANT’S...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00910

    Original file (ND02-00910.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 030311. 970929: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, recommended Applicant be separated (suspended for 12 months), and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01227

    Original file (ND04-01227.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Travel certificate, separation without orders, dated November 10, 1998 Applicant’s United States Army-RA DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USA 790322 - 820917 HON Inactive: USNR-R 851230 - 860407 COG Active: USNR 860408 - 900404 HON USNR 900405 - 940126 HON...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500498

    Original file (ND0500498.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 950103: Reenlisted this date for 4 years.980526: NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 980515 tested positive for cocaine.980609: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use of cocaine on or about 980512. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00013

    Original file (ND03-00013.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Twelve pages from Applicant’s service PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 960627 - 961021 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 961022 Date of Discharge: 990122 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 03 01 Inactive:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500136

    Original file (ND0500136.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to “miscellaneous/General Reasons”. The summary of service clearly documents that misconduct due to drug abuse was the reason the Applicant was discharged. The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits not the Navy Discharge Review Board.