Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01043
Original file (ND04-01043.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-FN, USN
Docket No. ND04-01043

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20040614. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20041103. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.



PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

 1. “To Whom it May Concern

Dear To Whom It May Concern,

My greatest goal is to get back into the United States Navy. I’m applying for upgrade in re-enlistment and re-enlistment code. The following issues are the reasons I believe my discharge should be upgraded to Honorable. I wish when I was first discharged, that I had pursued this issue further. I was younger then, and really wasn’t thinking long-term in regards to the ramifications of what transpired. I seeked Navy council three times, and the council told me it was an uphill battle that I probably would not win. They stated that it didn’t make sense for me to fight it, because it was a drug related charge. I felt like they didn’t even try to help me. I wanted to still be with the United States Navy, with no desire to leave. It had become my home and also my life. I felt like I had no representation to state the facts of my case in a clear manner. Since I’m older now I wish I had continued to try to seek the Navy’s council in a more aggressive manner. One person told me to just let it go, so I did. I truly wanted the case to be tried with my statement being documented. When I was in the Navy, I demonstrated the ability and desire to be a good sailor. My average conduct and efficiency ratings and behavior and proficiency marks were always pretty good. I received 2 Battle E’s. However, at different times in my life, my personal problems impaired my ability to serve at the best of my ability. I have been a good citizen since I was discharged. I write to you, with the hope that my statement will be taken into strong consideration. I have enclosed several letters of recommendations stating that I am of strong character and beliefs. My past record did not make me waiver from being a good man. Any mistakes I made in my past were due to poor choices as a younger man, lacking direction.

Sincerely,

P_ K_ (Applicant)”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214
Letter from Senator of Illinois, dated April 26, 2004
Letter of recommendation, undated
Character reference from Lake Villa Township Supervisor, dated April 7, 2004
Character reference from Lake Villa Township, dated April 30, 2004
Character reference from Lake Villa Township Highway Department, dated April 29, 2004
Character reference from Administrative Assistant, Lake Villa Assessors Office, dated April 29, 2004
Character reference from employee at the Lake Villa Township Assessors Office, dated May 6, 2004
Character reference from Field Appraiser, Lake Villa Assessors Office, dated May 6, 2004
Character reference from Administrative Assistant, Lake Villa Assessors Office, dated April 29, 2004
Character reference from police officer in the Lake Villa area, undated
Character reference from Clinical Research Coordinator, undated
Letter of reference, undated
Applicant’s resumé
Certificate in Certified Nurse Assisting, dated December 2000
Letter to the Applicant from National Personnel Records Center, dated March 17, 2004
Fifty-three pages from Applicant’s service record

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     930520 - 930614  COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 930615               Date of Discharge: 950615

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 00 01
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 21                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 65

 Highest Rate: FN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.80 (2)    Behavior: 3.80 (2)                OTA: 3.70
Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: BER, NDSM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

930720:  You are being retained in the Naval service, despite your defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry into naval service as evidenced by your failure to disclose your pre-service civil involvement. Possession of drug paraphernalia, Jackson, MS, 8/90. Paid $500.00 fine. Possession of a controlled substance, Chicago, IL, 6/92, dropped. Eluding police, Chicago, IL 6/92, dropped. However, any further deficiencies in performance or conduct may result in processing for administrative separation.

931213:  Letter from Chief of Naval Personnel to USS YORKTOWN (CG-48) with Applicant’s arrest record.

 940106:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry into naval service.
940109:  Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
940110:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry into naval service.
940401:  BUPERS message to USS YORKTOWN to reprocess Applicant for defective enlistments and inductions due to fraudulent entry into naval service using admin procedures in accordance with NAVMILPERSMAN 3640200. Administrative processing is mandatory in accordance with NAVMILPERSMAN 3610260.6.

 940411:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry into naval service as evidenced by failing to reveal your civilian involvement.

940412:  Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.
940601:  An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, and by a vote of 2 to 1 recommended retention.

940603:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

940708:  BUPERS message advised TRANSITPERSU Norfolk, VA to prepare a page 13 Counseling/Warning. No further action with regard to administrative separation contemplated.

940713:  You are being retained in the Naval service, in spite of your administrative discharge findings on 940701 which found that you had committed defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry into the naval service, as evidenced by failing to reveal your involvement with the civilian authorities for a cocaine possession charge, armed robbery and contempt of court offense. However, any further deficiencies in performance or conduct may result in processing for administrative separation.

950502:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A: Substance abuse.
         Award: Forfeiture of $497.55 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
950502:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by the drug incident in your current enlistment.
950502:  Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
950502:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

950504:  Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Marijuana abuse, ashore off duty. Abuse denied. Random urinalysis 950405. CAAC recommended separation. Commanding Officer recommended separation. Comments: FN K_ (Applicant) is being processed for administrative discharge. He has no potential for future naval service.

950601:  BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19950615 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issue 1: There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Mandatory processing for separation is required for sailors who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. While he may feel that his youth and immaturity were contributing factors, they do not mitigate the Applicant’s disobedience of the orders and directives that regulate good order and discipline in the naval service, demonstrating he was unsuitable for further service. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.

Concerning a change in reenlistment code, the NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Naval Service or any other branch of the Armed Forces. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter.

There is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. E vidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record, a drug free lifestyle, and certification of community service and non-involvement with civil authorities are examples of verifiable proof that can be submitted. At this time, the Board determined that the documentation submitted by the Applicant does not mitigate his misconduct while on active duty.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9/94, effective
22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00014

    Original file (ND03-00014.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4 (2 copies)) Twenty-six pages from Applicant's service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 011210 - 020115 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 020116 Date of Discharge: 020404 Length of Service (years,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00314

    Original file (ND99-00314.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00314 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 981230, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to reentry to a 3 or below. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 961202 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00616

    Original file (ND04-00616.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Thank you for your time in reading this letter and please consider my request.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 940713 - 950705 COG Active: USN None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 950706 Date of Discharge: 970430 Length of Service (years, months,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00480

    Original file (ND00-00480.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00480 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000302, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed General/under Honorable conditions or Entry level separation or uncharacterized. I did not do or use drugs prior to my military enlistment. The applicant did not provide any post-service documentation for the Board to consider.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01301

    Original file (ND02-01301.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-01301 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20020911, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. As the representative, we ask that consideration be given to equitable relief, as this is a matter that involves a determination whether a discharge should be changed under the equity standards, to include any issue upon which the applicant submits to the Board’s discretionary authority,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00660

    Original file (ND03-00660.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00660 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20030304, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to Convenience of the Government. On page two, item k, Separation Authority Action: it states my discharge should have been ‘characterized as General Under Honorable Conditions, based on fraudulent entry into the naval service.’ My DD-214 does not reflect the recommendation...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00053

    Original file (ND04-00053.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I am requesting that my RE-4 be changed to an RE-1 and that my Interservice Separation Code be changed from a 74 to 99, or another code that will allow me to get back in. Please change my DD 214 to allow me to serve my country with pride.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Ten pages from Applicant’s service/medical records Applicant’s statement, dated April 16, 2003 PART...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00599

    Original file (MD04-00599.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant’s enlistment contract documents admission of pre-service marijuana experimentation. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01071

    Original file (ND03-01071.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :990312: USN Alcohol and Drug Abuse Screening Certificate (NAVCRUIT 1133/7): Applicant failed to disclose pre-service criminal activity, police record.990528: Commanding Officer, Recruit Training Command authorized Applicant’s discharge with an uncharacterized service by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry. By regulation, members discharged within the first 180 days of enlistment are given a service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600301

    Original file (ND0600301.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application and attached letter: “ I would like to have my re-entry code changed to RE-1 so that I may have the opportunity to re-enlist.” “Dear Sirs: This is to correct my Navy record so that I may once again begin a military career. By regulation, members notified of...