Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00088
Original file (ND04-00088.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-AN, USN
Docket No. ND04-00088

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20031015. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040628. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-106 (formerly 3630650).

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

 1. “I have attached my service record and medical and dental records as well as a medical report. Please consider my supporting documents, as a reason to upgrade my discharge. I felt that the considerable amount of hearing loss was reason to leave the Navy, and it felt that was the best thing to do for the good of the service. Thank you very much for your time.

Sincerely, ”

Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
 Applicant ’ s medical and service record

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     001018 - 001219  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 001220               Date of Discharge: 020626

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 04 12         (Does not include lost time)
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 21                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 56

 Highest Rate: AN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

None

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 50

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-106 (formerly 3630650).

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

020528:  Applicant requested an administrative discharge under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial. He declined to consult with counsel. The Applicant stated he understood the elements of the offense with which he was charged, and admitted he was guilty of the charge preferred against him. Specifically, he admitted to violating UCMJ, Article 86: UA from USS Carl Vinson from 0001, 010406 to 2230, 020525. The Applicant understood that if discharged under other than honorable conditions, it might deprive him of virtually all veterans ’ benefits based upon his current enlistment, and that he might expect to encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life in situations wherein the type of service rendered or the character of discharge received therefrom may have a bearing.

020604:  The Commanding Officer, exercising GCMCA, approved the request for an administrative separation in lieu of a trial by court-martial, and directed Applicant ’ s discharge.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20020620 under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

Issue I. On 20020528, the Applicant requested an administrative discharge under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial. He declined to consult with counsel. The Applicant stated he understood the elements of the offense with which he was charged, and admitted he was guilty of the charge preferred against him. The Applicant ’ s hearing loss does not mitigate his misconduct. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.

The Applicant ’ s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant ’ s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 29, effective
11 Jul 2000 until 21 Aug 2002, Article 1910-106 (formerly 3630650), SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL.

B. A punitive bad conduct discharge may be adjudged for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 86, unauthorized absence for a period more than 30 days upon conviction by a Special or General Court-Martial, in accordance with the Manual for Courts-Martial.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01505

    Original file (ND03-01505.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-01505 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030922. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record review.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00557

    Original file (ND00-00557.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00557 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000329, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :990119: Charges preferred to court-martial for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 86: Unauthorized absence (UA) from 0715, 7Dec98 to 2130, 15Jan99 (39 days/surrendered).pplicant requested an...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00880

    Original file (ND03-00880.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00880 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030422. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4) Letter from Special Assistant, Congressional Liaison Office, dated June 25, 2001 PART II...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00109

    Original file (ND01-00109.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00109 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001031, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. My letter of explanation is attached.” Concerning a change in reenlistment code, the NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reentry into the naval service or any other of the Armed Forces.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00384

    Original file (ND01-00384.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00384 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010207, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. After a thorough review of the records, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In response to the applicant’s issue, to permit relief, an error or...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00208

    Original file (ND04-00208.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00208 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031117. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 980730 - 991020 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 991021 Date of Discharge: 020226 Length of Service (years,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00024

    Original file (ND04-00024.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00024 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031001. I did not want discharged. Please allow me the chance to correct my wrong doings, and serve my country in it’s time of need.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01190

    Original file (ND01-01190.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-01190 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010920, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to Hardship-RE-3. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 991216 under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial (A). PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00989

    Original file (ND03-00989.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00989 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030522. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The NDRB also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00720

    Original file (ND03-00720.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. requested an administrative discharge under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial. At this time, the Applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider.