Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01452
Original file (ND03-01452.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-DCFN, USN
Docket No. ND03-01452

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030903. The Applicant requests the reason for the discharge be changed to COMPLETION OF SVC. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040628. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the narrative reason for discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: HONORABLE/ PERSONALITY DISORDER, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3620200.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

 1. “VETERAN REQUESTS CHANGE OF NARRATIVE REASON FOR DISCHARGE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING: VETERAN WAS SERVING ON A DECOMMISSIONED SHIP AND WAS ON "EARLY OUT" STATUS. ADMINISTRATION WAS UNNECESSARILY TAKING PLACE AS VETERAN WAS ELIGIBILE FOR DISCHARGE.
VETERAN WAS UNDER SEVERE STRESS COPEING WITH EXSPOUSE’S DRUG PROBLEM AND ATTEMPTING TO CONTINUE HIS NAVY CAREER. IT IS NOTEWORTHY THAT VETERAN HAD TO RESOLVE EXSPOUSE DRUG PROBLEM BY FILING FOR DIVORCE AFTER DISCHARGE AND RETURN TO MINNESOTA.
VETERAN WAS AT ODDS TO SOLVE PROBLEM AND REQUESTED ASSISTANCE FROM PERSONNEL COUNSELOR. IT IS BELIEVED THAT VETERAN’S DISCHARGE WAS EXPEDITED "AS A PATH OF LEAST RESISTANCE" WITH AN UNCOMPLIMENTARY NARRATIVE TO SEPARATION.
VETERAN HAS SINCE REMARRIED AND SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING. HE IS EMPLOYED WITH THE DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND IS A RESPECTED CITIZEN OF THE LOCAL COMMUNITY.
THE NARRATIVE REASON (BLOCK 25, DD214) HAS CAUSED VETERAN THE INCONVENIENCE AND EMBARASSMENT OF EXPLAINING WHY HE LEFT THE UNITED STATES NAVY. IT IS AN OBVIOUS DISTRACTION TO HIS HONORABLE SERVICE.

VETERAN WAS UNAWARE THAT THE REQUEST FOR CHANGE MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 3 YEARS.”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     910329 - 910918  COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 910919               Date of Discharge: 931001

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 00 13
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 32

 Highest Rate: DCFN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.40 (3)    Behavior: 3.60 (3)                OTA: 3.50

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, SASM with 1 Bronze Star, AFEM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

HONORABLE/PERSONALITY DISORDER, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3620200.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

910920:  You are being retained in the Naval service, despite your defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry into naval service as evidenced by your failure to disclose your pre-service civil involvement/drug abuse. Aug 91 Speeding, dismissed with written warning. This decision is based on the information you provided the Recruit Quality Assurance Interviewer and if it is found that additional information has not been disclosed, this waiver is void and you could be subject to other judicial or administrative proceedings. However, any further deficiencies in performance or conduct may result in processing for administrative separation.

930913:  Applicant diagnosed with Axis I: Marital problems, alcohol abuse, adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance in emotions and conduct, resolving. Axis II: Borderline personality disorder, severe, with antisocial traits. Axis III: Upper respiratory infection, resolved. The psychiatrist recommended separation based on a personality disorder of such severity as to render the Applicant incapable of serving adequately in the naval service. Applicant was considered self-destructive and a continuing risk of harm to self or others.

          [History of present illness: …he has cut his chest and back with a knife because “I want people to feel sorry for me, I do it in front of them when we are arguing.” The patient also reported gouging his own back with a pair of scissors while fighting with his wife…. He reported strong homicidal ideations towards his wife that are very egodystonic to him. He is fearful of acting on the impulses which are “pretty strong.” He has thoughts of strangling her neck with her hands and repeatedly acted out a strangling scenario for the therapist – strangling an imagined neck. He desired to be immediately separated from the military and wanted to go back to his home in Minnesota.]

930929:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of convenience of the government on the basis of a diagnosed personality disorder of such severity as to render the Applicant incapable of serving adequately in the naval service.
930929:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights. Applicant indicated he did not object to the separation.
931016:  Commanding Officer directed discharge with a honorable by reason of convenience of the government on the basis of a diagnosed personality disorder of such severity as to render the Applicant incapable of serving adequately in the naval service.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19931001 with an honorable discharge for convenience of the government on the basis of a diagnosed personality disorder of such severity as to render the Applicant incapable of serving adequately in the naval service. (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

Issue 1. The documentation and statements provided by the Applicant were not sufficient to overturn the presumption that the Applicant was properly diagnosed with a personality disorder. The Applicant was diagnosed with a personality disorder by a competent medical authority on 930913. The evidence reviewed did not persuade the Board that this diagnosis and subsequent administrative separation was improper or inequitable. No other Narrative Reason for Separation could more clearly describe why the applicant was discharged. To change the Narrative Reason for Separation would be inappropriate. Relief denied.

There is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge or narrative reason may be upgraded or changed based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. The NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge or change of narrative reason. At this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation for the Board to consider an upgrade.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 5, effective 05 Mar 1993 until 21 Jul 1994, Article 3620200, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT.

B. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C, Change 5, effective 930305 - 940721), Article 3620225, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT ON THE BASIS OF PERSONALITY DISORDER.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01068

    Original file (ND01-01068.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).The applicant’s issue states: “Respectfully request this change (reason for discharge) because the DD Form 214 is a record of public knowledge and my DD 214 contains "Personality Disorder" as the reason for discharge. I appreciate the board taking time to review this application.” The NDRB, under its responsibility...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00952

    Original file (ND03-00952.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to honorable disabled (Ret). We refer this case to the Board for their careful and compassionate consideration and request the Applicant’s discharge be upgraded to honorable based on medical reasons.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00121

    Original file (ND04-00121.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. I thank you for your time and Respectfully request you upgrade my Discharge, Thank you.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 910508 -...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01441

    Original file (ND03-01441.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the reason for the discharge be changed to “honorable with medical conditions.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant was diagnosed with a personality disorder and bulimia nervosa by competent medical authority. The summary of service clearly documents that personality disorder was the reason the applicant was discharged.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00553

    Original file (ND02-00553.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-SA, USN Docket No. This member (Applicant) is deemed fit for return to duty for immediate processing for administrative separation.890327: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge general (under honorable conditions) by reason of convenience of the government on the basis of a diagnosed personality disorder of such severity as to render the Applicant incapable of serving...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00349

    Original file (ND03-00349.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    J_ S_ G_ 6/26/02 ” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (2) Department of Veterans Affairs, Appointment of Veterans Service Organization as claimant’s representative, dated June 26, 2002 (2) Enlisted Performance Record (2) Letter of Commendation (2) The summary of service clearly documents that a personality disorder was the reason the Applicant was discharged. However,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00451

    Original file (ND99-00451.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    4 - patient is judged sane, able to tell right from wrong and to adhere to the right, and to assist capably and adequately in his own defense.960614: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge, type warranted by service record, or the least favorable characterization of general (under honorable conditions) by reason of convenience of the government due to personality disorder as evidenced by diagnosis by competent military medical authority which concluded that the medical...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00706

    Original file (ND99-00706.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In response to applicant’s issue 1, the diagnosis by a competent military medical authority did qualify the applicant for discharge by reason of convenience of the government on the basis of a personality disorder. The only exception is in cases, such as the applicant’s, where the military medical authority has evaluated the member as...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01052

    Original file (ND02-01052.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since reporting to ship 7 months ago has had increased dissatisfaction which has result in 5-6 fights off base and 1 physical fight with his girlfriend 2 months ago on leave. Mbr not currently suicidal/homicidal but presents a continuing risk/liability to harm self/others if returned on board ship& in the USN. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 881021 under honorable conditions (general) for convenience of the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00249

    Original file (ND02-00249.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Thank you Documentation Applicant did not provide any additional documentation for the Board to consider, therefore, only the Applicant's service and medical records were reviewed. Corrective action provided.Note: No record of counseling/retention warning in official record documenting how personality disorder has effected performance, nor did a period of time elapse for the Applicant to correct any deficiencies as specifically related to his personality disorder.920730: Applicant notified...