Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01236
Original file (ND03-01236.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DRAFT DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-BUCN, USN
Docket No. ND03-01236

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030716. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). The Applicant requests a personal appearance hearing before the Board in the Washington National Capital Region. The Applicant listed the Veteran of Foreign Wars as the representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A personal appearance hearing was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20041116. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.





PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated
Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “Re: Docket No. ND00-01011
In accordance with the information provided to me in the copy of Review of Discharge, please accept this as my request for a personal appearance hearing before the Naval Discharge Board regarding my request to have the characterization of service on my discharge changed to General/Under Honorable Conditions.
I also elect to have a representative from the VFW present at the hearing to act as my counsel. Thank You.”

Additional issues submitted by Applicant’s counsel/representative (VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS):

2. “Inequity to be argued for a General Under Honorable VS Other Than Honorable.”

Submitted by Applicant subsequent to submission of application:

“1. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Letter of recommendation from J_ H_ S_ Jr., dated October 25, 2005
Letter of recommendation from J_ K_ S_, dated April 19, 2001

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     871102 - 880501  COG
         Active: USN                        None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 880502               Date of Discharge: 920508

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 04 00 07
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4 (12 months extension)

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 54

 Highest Rate: BU3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.60 (5)             Behavior: 3.90 (5)                OTA: 3.64

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, SASM, SSDR (3), QUAL Expert M16A1 Rifle

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

880503:  Applicant briefed on Navy's policy of drug and alcohol abuse.

 910822:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use of cocaine, violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Failure to obey an order.
         Award: Forfeiture of $481.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days and reduction in paygrade to E-3. No indication of appeal in the record. [Extracted from NMCB ONE THREE THREE MSG 30MAR92]

910920:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense as evidenced by one nonjudicial punishment for the wrongful use of cocaine. An offense for which a bad conduct discharge is an authorized punishment. [Extracted from NMCB ONE THREE THREE MSG 30MAR92]

910922:  Medical Officer diagnosed member not to be drug dependent and does not require detoxification. [Extracted from NMCB ONE THREE THREE MSG 30MAR92]
910924:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation. [Extracted from NMCB ONE THREE THREE MSG 30MAR92]
920330:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense. Commanding Officer’s comments: BUCN T_ (Applicant) stated at his nonjudicial punishment proceeding that he did not recall the circumstances surrounding his use of cocaine due to alcohol intoxication nor does he recall actually using it. Notwithstanding this assertion, he is still responsible for his actions and drug abuse cannot be tolerated. Therefore, separation from the naval service is appropriate in this case. However, BUCN T_ (Applicant) has been an excellent worker since reporting to this command and has had no other incidents requiring disciplinary or administrative action. Accordingly, based upon his performance and character of service, I recommend BUCN T_ (Applicant) be separated from the Naval service with a discharge characterized as General.
         Additional Comments of the Commanding Officer: Reference A. was initially mailed 971027. Since that time BUCN T_(Applicant)’s conduct and performance has continued to be above average, which I believe should be taken into account in the characterization of his discharge.

920406:  BUPERS directed Applicant’s command to determine drug/alcohol dependency.

920421:  Drug/ETOH evaluation: Applicant is considered to be ETOH dependent and not drug dependent, but a drug abuser. Drug abuse was confirmed by clinical evaluation. Applicant offered Level III treatment via the VA after discharge. Member agrees he has an Alcohol problem.

920428:  BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

920507:  Member was counseled regarding the Veterans Administration/Drug Rehabilitation Program and waived his right to VA rehabilitation treatment and elect to be administratively discharged.

010215:  NDRB documentary record review Docket Number ND00-01011 conducted. Determination: discharge proper and equitable; relief not warranted.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19920508 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issues 1 and 2: There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Mandatory processing for separation is required for sailors who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. The Applicant presented an oral argument during his personal appearance hearing that his personal problems were a mitigating factor. The Board determined that while his family problems may have been a contributing factor, they do not mitigate the Applicant’s disobedience of the orders and directives that regulate good order and discipline in the naval service, demonstrating he was unsuitable for further service. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.

With regard to the discrepancy between the draft document mailed to the Applicant prior to the personal appearance hearing and the one presented to the Applicant on the day of the hearing, this discrepency was resolved by referencing the Applicant’s official service record. This document contains the correct chronological listing of significant events found in the service record. The Board considered the corrected chronological listing of dates and activities during deliberations.

There is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. E vidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record, a drug free lifestyle, and certification of community service and non-involvement with civil authorities are examples of verifiable proof that can be submitted. The Board determined that the documentation submitted by the Applicant does not mitigate his misconduct while on active duty.

The following if provided for the edification of the Applicant. The NDRB has no authority to provide additional review of this case. The Applicant may, however, petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100, concerning a change in the characterization of naval service, if he desires further review of his case.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), effective 15 Aug 91 until 04 Mar 93, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01011

    Original file (ND00-01011.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-01011 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000830, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. On 2 May 92, I was separated from the Navy with an Other than Honorable Discharge for drug abuse. Accordingly, based upon his performance and character of service, I recommend BUCN (applicant) be separated from the Naval Service with a discharge characterized as General.920428: BUPERS directed...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01127

    Original file (ND99-01127.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall change to: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214. No further information found.970515: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by CO's NJP 2 Apr 97 and NAVDRUGLAB JACKSONVILLE msg...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00730

    Original file (ND02-00730.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Please help me Review Board with a Second Change. Commanding Officer recommended separate from service.880623: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).Commanding Officer’s comments (verbatim): [SNM signed page 13 counseling him on the Navy's policy toward drug abuse 27Apr 87. After a complete review of the record, including the evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board determined that the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00843

    Original file (ND03-00843.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00037

    Original file (ND03-00037.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    As the supporting documents that I have submitted demonstrate my post service conduct and accomplishments have been sufficiently creditable to warrant the Board's clemency relief with upgrade of my character of service. 870618: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense, to wit: Sleeping on watch, dereliction of duty, and drunk on duty; and misconduct due to drug abuse as...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01194

    Original file (ND03-01194.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-SR, USN Docket No. The Commander, Naval Personnel Command, Millington, TN, will be notified, recommending the DD Form 214 be corrected or reissued, as appropriate. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :950209: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 91: Disobey a lawful order, violation of UCMJ, Article 117: Wrongful use of provoking words, violation of UCMJ, Article 134: Communicate...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00025

    Original file (ND03-00025.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I have been awarded the employee of the month for May 1998 at Club Fit, as well as my important responsibilities of opening and closing the club, as well as handling the cash registers; I have been a soccer coach for 5 years now at Croton-Harmon High School, New York. Award: Forfeiture of $154 per month for 1 month, extra duty for 30 days, reduction to SR. No indication of appeal in the record.920505: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00961

    Original file (ND04-00961.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.921014: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, to wit: violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a, wrongful use of methamphetamine on or about 920910 as evidenced by Commanding Officer’s NJP held on 921013. 921104: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.921110: BUPERS directed...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00806

    Original file (ND04-00806.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing and that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) does not travel; all hearings are held in the Washington DC area. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00421

    Original file (ND04-00421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00421 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040114. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Mandatory processing for separation is required for sailors who abuse illegal drugs.