Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01225
Original file (ND03-01225.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-AD2, USN
Docket No. ND03-01225

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030711. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a personal appearance discharge review before a traveling panel closest to Memphis, TN. The Applicant listed the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) as the representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) does not travel; all hearings are held in the Washington DC area. The NDRB also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040514. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-144 (formerly 3630610).


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 No issues were submitted by the Applicant.

Issues submitted by Applicant’s counsel/representative ( Veterans Of Foreign Wars):
1. “Applicant indicated above requested that Veterans of Foreign Wars act as counsel concerning his application. His records were reviewed on Nov 7, 2003 and the following comments are hereby submitted:

 We concur with the Applicant’s contention that his discharge be upgraded.
We refer this case to the Board for their careful and compassionate consideration and request the Applicant's discharge be reviewed for upgrading his discharge to General Discharge.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USN                        710910 – 740909  HON
                  USAF             850816 – 870910  HON
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     870911 - 880104  COG
         Active: USN                        880105 - 901023  HON
                  USN                       901024 – 950119  HON
                  USN                       950120 – 971209  HON

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 971210               Date of Discharge: 000726

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 07 17
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 45                          Years Contracted: 3

 Education Level: 13 1/2           AFQT: 47

 Highest Rate: AD2

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.20 (5)    Behavior: 2.20 (5)                OTA: 2.91

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: GCM (3), MUC, AFEM, NDSM (2), BER, SSDR (2), NUC, VSM, VCM, Letter of Appreciation

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 100

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-144 (formerly 3630610).




 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

990430:  Applicant failed PRT due to run.

991202:  Applicant apprehended by Coronado Police Department.

991203:  Applicant extradited to County of Madison, IL Police Department.
991209:  U.S. Naval Criminal Investigative Service Report.

 000313:  Civil Conviction: Third Judicial Circuit Court, Madison County, IL for violation of criminal sexual assault.
 Sentence: Probation for 3 years.
000331:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to civil conviction.
000331:  Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.
000403:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 2057, 991202 to 1700, 00313 (100 days).
         Award: Restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to AD3. Punishment suspended for 6 months. No indication of appeal in the record.
000606:  An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to a civil conviction, that the misconduct warranted separation, and by a vote of 2 to 1, recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions.

000612:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to civil conviction.

000710:  CNPC directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to civil conviction.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20000726 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to civil conviction (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1. The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and/or the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. There is no evidence of impropriety or inequity in the Applicant’s discharge. The Applicant’s misconduct is clearly documented. Therefore, relief is denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 28, effective 30 Mar 00 to 21 Aug 00, Article 1910-144 (previously 3630610), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Civilian Conviction.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00468

    Original file (ND01-00468.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00468 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010227, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to completed service. Willing to waive the administrative board if given an honorable discharge with the understanding that if request is denied, admin separation processing will continue and will have the right to elect an admin board or hearing.000316: Commanding officer...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00510

    Original file (ND99-00510.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    3 - Payment of the victim's counseling. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 980424 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to civil conviction (A). You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00871

    Original file (ND02-00871.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00871 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020607, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. In my 7 1/2 years of naval service my only misconduct was due to alcohol (two cases) and other than that I was a 4.0 sailor. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :981221: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to civil...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00652

    Original file (ND02-00652.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Equity Issue) This former member avers that his naval record reflects a conduct of record to warrant upgrade of his characterization of service. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of service, falls short of that required for an honorable characterization of service....

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00602

    Original file (ND01-00602.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN 920715 - 960616 HON Inactive: USNR (DEP) 920610 - 920714 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 960617 Date of Discharge: 980515 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 10 26 Inactive: None After a thorough...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00939

    Original file (ND02-00939.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I am requesting that my discharge be upgraded to Honorable, due to I have received good conduct award three times. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).Issues 1-8, 10-11: The Applicant requests his discharge be upgraded to honorable due to his overall good service record. regulation limits its review to a determination on the propriety and equity of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01060

    Original file (ND00-01060.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 991104 general under honorable conditions for misconduct due to civil conviction (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In response to the applicant’s issue 1, the Board thoroughly reviewed the applicant’s service record and determined a general...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01262

    Original file (ND04-01262.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I am requesting that you review the testimony and if necessary review my previous service record to see that I had never been charged with any offense before this time. Applicant)” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 740901 - 740922 COG Active: USN 740923 -...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00269

    Original file (ND04-00269.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board further found that the misconduct and erroneous enlistment warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions. Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to civil conviction.021217: Commander, Naval Training Center, Great Lakes directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to civil conviction. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01249

    Original file (ND03-01249.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copies of DD Form 214 (2) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 951129 - 951210 COG Active: USN None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 951211 Date of...