Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01223
Original file (ND03-01223.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-AMAR, USN
Docket No. ND03-01223

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030710. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040514. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-140 (formerly 3630600).



PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:
1. “The discharge is improper due to the fact that all my charges were alcohol Related, and I was given pattern of misconduct with out the chance to seek out medical attention for alcoholism. My Command VFA-41 offered no help. Therefore I ask the Board for a General Discharge under honorable conditions, with an upgraded reentry code.
 So that I may once again serve my country in its time of need.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     000524 - 000620  COG
          Active: None
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 000621               Date of Discharge: 020910

 Length of Service (years, months, days):
         Active: 02 02 20
         Inactive: None
Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 43
Highest Rate: AMHAN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
Performance: 2.50 (2)    Behavior: 2.00 (2)                OTA: 2.25

 Military Decorations: None
Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: SSDR, AFEM, NDSM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 61
Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-140 (formerly 3630600).
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

020401:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92 (2 specs):
 Specification 1: Failure to obey order or regulation.
 Specification 2: Failure to obey order or regulation.
         Award: Forfeiture of $200 per month for 2 months, extra duty for 14 days, reduction to AMHAA. Forfeiture suspended for 6 months. No indication of appeal in the record.
020402:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Disobeying lawful order, and wrongful consumption and/or possession of alcoholic beverage(s) while under the age of 21 years old.), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.
020523:  Applicant declared a deserter 0900, 020523.

 020724:  Vacate suspended forfeiture awarded at CO’s NJP dated 020401.
020724:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 0900, 020523 to 1816, 020723, violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Failure to obey other lawful order, to wit: wrongfully consuming alcohol beverages at or near his barracks room while under the age of twenty-one on 020517, violation of UCMJ, Article 112: Drunk on duty on 0101, 020523, violation of UCMJ, Article 128: Assault Airman by striking him with his fists on 0101, 020523.
         Award: Forfeiture of $552 per month for 2 months, restriction for 60 days, reduction to AMAR No indication of appeal in the record.
020828:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.
020828:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.
020906:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.
020909:  Commanding Officer, Naval Air Station, Lemoore directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20020910 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).
Issue 1. When a Sailor’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. Characterization of service as other than honorable is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member's conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member's military record. The applicant’s service was marred by the award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on two occasions for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). The applicant’s misconduct included unauthorized absence, disobeying a lawful order, drinking in barracks and being drunk on duty. The applicant’s conduct and proficiency markings, which form the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflect his misconduct, and fall below that required for an honorable characterization of service. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate. Relief is therefore denied.

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and/or the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. There is no evidence of impropriety or inequity in the Applicant’s discharge. The Applicant’s misconduct is clearly documented. Therefore, relief is denied.

Concerning a change in reenlistment code, the NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Naval Service or any other branch of the Armed Forces. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes.

The following is provided for the edification of the applicant. There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded, based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving naval service. The NDRB is authorized, however, to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective
12 Dec 1997 until 21 Aug 2002, Article 1910-140 (formerly 3630600), SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:
                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                   Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00186

    Original file (ND04-00186.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Equity Issue: Based on our review of evidentiary record and on behalf of this former member, we request that the Board consider provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of this...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00902

    Original file (ND03-00902.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board will determine which reason for discharge should have been assigned based upon the facts and circumstances before the Board, including the service regulations governing the reasons for discharge at that time, to determine whether relief is warranted. As the representative, we ask that consideration be given to equitable relief, as this is a matter that involves a determination whether a discharge should be changed under the equity standards, to include any issue upon which the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01268

    Original file (ND03-01268.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Award: Forfeiture of $552.75 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 20 days, reduction to SR. No indication of appeal in the record.020523: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.020523: Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600616

    Original file (ND0600616.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 4) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 20010712 - 20010729 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 20010730 Date of Discharge: 20040819 Length of Service (years, months, days): Active: 03 00 20 Inactive: None Time Lost During...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00450

    Original file (ND04-00450.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. 020815: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01428

    Original file (ND03-01428.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Award: 3 days confinement on bread and water.020919: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.Commanding Officer’s comments: FA K_’s (Applicant’s) continue misconduct is detrimental to the good order and discipline of this command. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01044

    Original file (ND03-01044.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. From B_ M_ M_ (Applicant)P.S. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Naval Council of Personnel Boards Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309 Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600365

    Original file (ND0600365.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). In closing I would like to thank you for taking the time to review my file and considering my request.Sincerely, [signed] N_ M. M_ (Applicant)” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 4) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01182

    Original file (ND04-01182.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Letter from Applicant, undated Service Record Documents, annotated by Applicant, 26 Apr 02 (3 pages) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 000929 -...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00832

    Original file (ND01-00832.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 970324 - 970819 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 970820 Date of Discharge: 000929 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active:...