Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00999
Original file (ND03-00999.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-SR, USNR
Docket No. ND03-00999

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030516. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a personal appearance discharge review before a traveling panel closest to West Winfield, New York. The Applicant listed the American Legion as the representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) does not travel; all hearings are held in the Washington DC area. The NDRB also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040423. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “I am requesting that my discharge be upgraded because I am attempting to turn my life around and find many avenues for employment and assistance (VA) closed to me since I do not have an Honorable Discharge. I am employed in a minimum wage position, attend AA meetings on a daily basis, and believe that I am in recovery and not the same person I was while in the service.

I realize that I will always be an alcoholic but have taken the steps to deal with my illness. An Honorable Discharge would be of immeasurable assistance for me in my recovery.

Thank you.”

Additional issues submitted by Applicant’s representative (American Legion):

“2 (Equity Issue) This former member further requests that the Board include provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of this application.”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214
Certificate of completion, dated May 23, 2002
Certificate of graduation, dated November 18, 2002
Statement in support of claim, dated May 6, 2003

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: None
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 950928               Date of Discharge: 960830

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 08 23                  Does not exclude lost time
         Inactive: 00 02 08

 Age at Entry: 27                          Years Contracted: 8

 Education Level: 13                        AFQT: 42

 Highest Rate: SA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NMA*                 Behavior: NMA*            OTA: NMA*

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 31

*No marks assigned.

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

951206:  Commenced 36 months of active duty.

 960401:  Retention Warning: No further information found in service record . [Extracted from Commanding Officer’s message dated 960731.]
        
960405:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence for 2 days, violation of UCMJ, Article 87: Missing ship’s movement, violation of UCMJ, Article 91 (2 specs): Insubordinate conduct toward a noncommissioned officer.
         Award: Forfeiture of $405 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to SR. No indication of appeal in the record.
960717:  Applicant to unauthorized absence 0730, 960717.

960724:  Applicant from unauthorized absence 2215, 960724 (7 days/surrendered).

960729:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence for 7 days, violation of UCMJ, Article 87: Missed ship’s movement.
         Award: Forfeiture of $437 per month for 2 months. No indication of appeal in the record.
960729:  USS ANTIETAM notified Applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of homosexual conduct and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and a pattern of misconduct. [Extracted from Commanding Officer’s message dated 960731.]
960729:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation. [Extracted from Commanding Officer’s message dated 960731.]
960731:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of homosexual conduct and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and a pattern of misconduct. Commanding Officer’s comments (verbatim): [SR K_’s (Applicant’s) statement of being a homosexual demonstrates a propensity and intent to engage in homosexual acts, and is incompatible with the naval service. His unsuitability is further evidenced by several cases of misconduct within only four months onboard, and warrants a discharge with characterization of other than honorable.]

960819:  BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged, in absentia, on 19960830 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issue 1: A characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions is warranted when the service member’s conduct constitutes a significant departure from that expected of a Sailor. The Applicant’s service record is marred by award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on two separate occasions. The Applicant’s summary of service clearly reflects the Applicant’s disobedience of the orders and directives that regulate good order and discipline in the naval service, and demonstrated he was unsuitable for further service. Relief denied.

 The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing benefits or employment opportunities as requested in the issue. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination on the propriety and equity of the discharge. In the Applicant’s case, the Board could discern no impropriety or inequity and therefore considered the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable.

Issue 2: There is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record, and certification of community service and non-involvement with civil authorities are examples of verifiable proof that can be submitted. At this time, the Board determined that the documentation submitted by the Applicant does not mitigate his misconduct while on active duty. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C, Change 9, effective
22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96), Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – A PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

J/PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00909

    Original file (ND99-00909.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I would like the board to review my documents to request a change in discharge. The applicant request’s the Board review his documents and change his discharge. On 6 August 1996, the Commander, Naval Training Center, Great Lakes directed the applicant be discharged with an Other Than Honorable for Pattern of misconduct, which is also reflected on the applicant’s form DD-214.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00235

    Original file (ND01-00235.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 951130: Ordered to active duty for 36 months under the Seaman Apprenticeship Program.Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Violation of the UCMJ, Article 121 (Larceny), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00313

    Original file (ND99-00313.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 940726 - 950717 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 950718 Date of Discharge: 960807 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 00 20 Inactive: None PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00688

    Original file (ND00-00688.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 930730 Date of Discharge: 961108 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 04 03 (Doesn't exclude lost time.) Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00691

    Original file (ND02-00691.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-FR, USN Docket No. I have been an addict since day one. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00673

    Original file (ND99-00673.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00673 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990416, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to General/under Honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 891220 -...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00612

    Original file (ND04-00612.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600. I was young and the recruiter made a deal with me, that cost me my life. Commanding Officer’s comments: SR F_ (Applicant) has been extremely inconsistent since reporting on board in April of last year.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00976

    Original file (ND00-00976.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00976 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000811, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. No indication of appeal in the record.990726: Chief of Naval Education and Training authorized discharge other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to pattern of misconduct. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 990820 under other...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00436

    Original file (ND99-00436.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 941102 - 941219 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 941220 Date of Discharge: 960729 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 07 10 Inactive: None CA action 960715: Sentence approved and ordered...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00267

    Original file (MD00-00267.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Block 24, Character of Service should read: “UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS” vice “GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS).” The original DD Form 214 should be corrected or reissued as appropriate. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. You should read Enclosure (5) of the...