Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00976
Original file (ND03-00976.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-SR, USN
Docket No. ND03-00976

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030514. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040408. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-140 (formerly 3630600).

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“1. To whom it may concern,

I will first start by explaining my discharge. In October of 1999 I was granted emergency leave because my mother was terminally ill and having emergency surgery. I was flown from Puerto Rico Home with 15 days to stay. I took full advantage of my ship being underway and stayed a lot longer than I was supposed to. While I was home I was hanging out with the wrong crowd. I did smoke some marijuana when I got back to my ship they gave me a drug test and I failed I am not a habitual drug user. I do understand ZERO TOLERANCE. If I was able to reenter I would definitely straiten up and fly right. I have grown and matured. I would not take it as a joke. It is very serious and important to me. Please consider this application seriously and carefully.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Letter from Applicant’s Mother (2 pages)
Copy of DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     980831 - 981006  COG
         Active: USN                        None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 981007               Date of Discharge: 991222

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 01 18
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 20                          Years Contracted: 4 (24 months extension)

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 75

 Highest Rate: SA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 2.00 (2)    Behavior: 2.00 (2)                OTA: 2.00

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 29

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-140 (formerly 3630600).

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

981008:  You are being retained in the Naval Service, despite your fraudulent induction as evidenced by your failure to disclose required basic enlistment eligibility information. This decision is based on the information you provided to the RECRUIT QUALITY ASSURANCE INTERVIEWER and if it is found that additional information has not been disclosed, you could be subject to other judicial or administrative proceedings.
 SPEEDING, 5/96, GREENWOOD CO, SC, Paid $90.
990422:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Article 92-violate a lawful general regulation-by wrongfully consuming an alcoholic beverage while under the age of 21; Article 134-Incapacitated for the proper performance of his duties), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

990422:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Underage drinking, violation of UCMJ, Article 134: Incapacitated for the proper performance of duties.
         Award: Forfeiture of $479.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days (15 days suspended for 6 months), reduction to next inferior pay grade (suspended for 6 months). No indication of appeal in the record.

991118:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: UA from 0700, 991016 to 1230, 991114 (29days/S).
         Award: Restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-2. No indication of appeal in the record.
991204:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Failure to go to appointed place of duty, violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use of a controlled substance.
Award: Restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-1. No indication of appeal in the record.
991206:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct drug abuse, misconduct commission of a serious offense, and misconduct pattern of misconduct.
991206:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation

991206:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct, misconduct commission of a serious offense, and misconduct drug abuse.

991215:  Commander, Cruiser-Destroyer Group 8 authorized the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19991222 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1: Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the Applicant’s enlistment. While he may feel that his youth and immaturity were contributing factors, they do not mitigate the Applicant’s disobedience of the orders and directives that regulate good order and discipline in the naval service, demonstrating he was unsuitable for further service. His service record is marred by award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on three separate occasions thus substantiating the misconduct . Relief denied.

Concerning a change in reenlistment code, the NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Naval Service or any other branch of the Armed Forces. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective
12 Dec 1997 until 21 Aug 2002, Article 1910-140 (formerly 3630600), SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00091

    Original file (ND03-00091.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.990404: Counseling: Advised of deficiency (Indebtedness), notified of corrective actions and assistance available.990406: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence on 2359,, 990401 to 2200, 990402, violation of UCMJ, Article 134 (2 specs): Dishonorably failing to maintain funds on 981020 and 981028, total of $20.00. The Applicant states...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00447

    Original file (ND03-00447.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-AMHAR, USN Docket No. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Naval Council of Personnel Boards Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board 720 Kennon Street SE Rm...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01044

    Original file (ND03-01044.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. From B_ M_ M_ (Applicant)P.S. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Naval Council of Personnel Boards Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309 Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00068

    Original file (ND04-00068.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-140 (formerly 3630600). Issues 2 and 3: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits not the Navy Discharge Review Board.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00300

    Original file (ND00-00300.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 960118 - 960220 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 960221 Date of Discharge: 980805 Length of Service (years, months, days): Active: 02 05 15 Inactive: None Age at Entry: 18 Years Contracted: 4...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00419

    Original file (ND99-00419.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    980129: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from unit 0720, 980116 to 1020, 980116. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 980706 with a general under honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A). There was nothing in the records, nor did the applicant provide any documentation, to indicate there existed an error of fact, law, procedure, or discretion at the time of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01182

    Original file (ND04-01182.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Letter from Applicant, undated Service Record Documents, annotated by Applicant, 26 Apr 02 (3 pages) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 000929 -...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00216

    Original file (ND02-00216.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00216 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020108, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the Board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. A review of the applicant’s service record, medical record, and additional documentation submitted indicates no such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00478

    Original file (ND01-00478.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I did four years honorable and only had four months left in the service when I was discharged. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant’s first issue states: “My evals throughout my four year shows that I was a good sailor, and deserve a honorable discharge.” The Board reviewed the applicant’s entire service record and found a well documented...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01057

    Original file (ND00-01057.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 970930 - 980615 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 980616 Date of Discharge: 990905 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 02 20 Inactive: None to wit: wrongfully having personal gear...