Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00830
Original file (ND03-00830.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-MMFN, USN
Docket No. ND03-00830

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030409. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040303. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “My discharge was inequitable. I had no pre-service and have had no post-service problems with drugs of any kind. I received good evaluations for most of my service period. My discharge was based on a mistake made by myself when I was young. I now wish I had not made it. My current discharge is keeping me from getting a better job and making a better life for myself. I have held steady employment since my discharge from the military and have not had a drug of any kind and I ask that the board take this into consideration. Thank you for your time.”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     890308 - 890411  COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 890412               Date of Discharge: 921118

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 07 07
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 20                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 13                        AFQT: 99

 Highest Rate: MM3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.07 (6)    Behavior: 3.30 (6)                OTA: 3.60

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, JMU, SASM with Bronze Star, SSDR

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

890419:  Applicant briefed on Navy's policy of drug and alcohol abuse.
890619:  Applicant briefed on Navy's policy of drug and alcohol abuse.
900425:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 0730 to 0745 900420.
         Award: Reduction to MMFN. No indication of appeal in the record.

921002:  NAVDRUGLAB, Norfolk, VA, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 920902, tested positive for THC.
921014:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A: Wrongful use of a controlled substance, to wit: marijuana.
         Award: Forfeiture of $300 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to MMFN. No indication of appeal in the record.
921016:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by urinalysis.
921019:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
911027:  Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the Applicant to be a drug abuser, not drug dependent.
921106:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

921116:  BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19921118 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1: Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the Applicant’s enlistment. While he may feel that his youth was a contributing factor, it does not mitigate the Applicant’s disobedience of the orders and directives that regulate good order and discipline in the naval service, demonstrating he was unsuitable for further service. His service record is marred by award of non-judicial punishment (NJP) on two separate occasions for unauthorized absence and illegal drug abuse. Additionally, t he Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment opportunities as requested in the issue. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination on the propriety and equity of the discharge. In the Applicant’s case, the Board could discern no impropriety or inequity and therefore considered the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable. Relief denied.

There is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record, a drug-free lifestyle, and certification of community service and non-involvement with civil authorities are examples of verifiable proof that can be submitted. At this time, the Board determined that the documentation submitted by the Applicant does not mitigate his misconduct while on active duty. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.



Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), effective 15 Aug 91 until 04 Mar 93, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01111

    Original file (ND03-01111.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On August 12 th in can back denied. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).Issues 1: The Applicant’s contends that he “never used drugs,” yet there is no evidence to support his claim. At this time, the Applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01006

    Original file (ND03-01006.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION 931230: BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 5/93, effective 05 Mar 93 until 21 Jul 94, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00377

    Original file (ND01-00377.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    981006: Letter from applicant to Commanding Officer requesting an administrative discharge board even though he had waived his right in August 1998. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).Issues 1 and 4. At this time the applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of good character and conduct.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00390

    Original file (ND00-00390.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00390 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000209, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board has no obligation to change the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00724

    Original file (ND00-00724.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization based solely on the issue of obtaining veteran’s benefits. At this time, the applicant has not provided any post service documentation of good character and conduct.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00273

    Original file (ND02-00273.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-MMFN, USN Docket No. ND02-00273 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020128, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The NDRB requested the Applicant provide pertinent documentation to the Board for review, if available.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01086

    Original file (ND00-01086.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-01086 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000926, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION I felt that I was cheated out of this great opportunity by my chain of command.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00225

    Original file (ND04-00225.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00225 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031119. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00103

    Original file (ND01-00103.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN 890616 - 910627 HON Inactive: USNR (DEP) 880621 - 890615 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 910628 Date of Discharge: 920603 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 00 11 06 Inactive: None After a thorough review of the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00943

    Original file (ND02-00943.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I strongly recommend that Fireman R_ (Applicant) be separated from the Naval service with a characterization of service as other than honorable. The Applicant ’ s service is equitably characterized as being performed under other than honorable conditions due to his own misconduct. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint.