Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00756
Original file (ND03-00756.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-SA, USN
Docket No. ND03-00756

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030326. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to entry level separation or uncharacterized. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040224. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-106 (formerly 3630650).

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

 1. “Dear Sir or Madam:

First of all, I would like to begin by saying that there is no excuse for my going AWOL. It was a completely selfish, childish action that was the biggest mistake I ever made. At the time of my AWOL. I had just been informed that my wife was cheating on me with my best friend and was leaving me. This caused much emotional damage to me and greatly influenced my decision to go AWOL. This was another sign of immaturity. I realize now that what I did was a disservice to myself, my fellow servicemen and servicewomen, and my country. I believe that, given a second chance, I will be a model sailor. I also realize that you have no reason to give me a second chance. However, I believe that I am worth a second chance. Since my discharge from the Navy, I have matured and grown and learned to deal with and understand many situations that previously I had difficulty dealing with. I know that, with an upgraded discharge, I will perform superlatively for my country. With that I would like to thank you for your time on this matter and respectfully urge you to make the right decision on this matter.

Sincerely

C_ C_ G_ ( Applicant )
(social security number deleted)”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     000922 - 010429  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 010430               Date of Discharge: 020117

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 08 18                  Does not exclude lost time
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 39

 Highest Rate: SA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NMF*                 Behavior: NMF             OTA: NMF

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 38

* No Marks found in service record

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-106 (formerly 3630650).

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

010913:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence failure to go to appointed place of duty.
         Date of offense: 010813-010816.
         Award: Forfeiture of $272 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 7 days. Forfeiture suspended for 6 months. No indication of appeal in the record.
010913:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Fail to go.), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.
011017:  Vacate suspended forfeiture of $272 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 7 days due to continued misconduct in violation of Article 86: Unauthorized absence fail to go.

011017:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence failure to go to appointed place of duty on 010921.
         Award: Forfeiture of $272 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 14 days. Forfeiture suspended for 6 months. No indication of appeal in the record.
020109:  Charges preferred to special court-martial for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 1730, 011130 to 0746, 020109 (38 days/surrendered).

020109:  Applicant requested an administrative discharge under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial. He consulted with counsel and was fully advised of the implications of his request. The Applicant stated he understood the elements of the offense(s) with which he was charged, and admitted he was guilty of all the charges preferred against him. Specifically, he admitted to violating UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 1730, 011130 to 0746, 020109 (38 days/surrendered). The Applicant stated he was completely satisfied with the counsel he had received. The Applicant understood that if discharged under other than honorable conditions, it might deprive him of virtually all veterans' benefits based upon his current enlistment, and that he might expect to encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life in situations wherein the type of service rendered or the character of discharge received therefrom may have a bearing.

020111:  The Commanding Officer, exercising GCMCA, approved the request for an administrative separation in lieu of a trial by court-martial, and directed Applicant’s discharge.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20020117 under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

 Issue 1: Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the Applicant’s enlistment. While he may feel that his personal problems were contributing factors, they do not mitigate the Applicant’s disobedience of the orders and directives that regulate good order and discipline in the naval service, demonstrating he was unsuitable for further service. His service record is marred by award of non-judicial punishment (NJP) on two separate occasions and a period of unauthorized absence in excess of thirty days. Furthermore, only members discharged within the first 180 days of their first enlistment can be given this kind of discharge. Since the Applicant served in excess of eight months, he cannot be given an uncharacterized or entry level separation. Relief is therefore denied.

The NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Naval Service or any other branch of the Armed Forces. However, neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for waiver is normally done during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter.

There is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record, and certification of community service and non-involvement with civil authorities are examples of verifiable proof that can be submitted.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.
Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 29, effective
11 Jul 2000 until 21 Aug 2002, Article 1910-106 (formerly 3630650), SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL.

B. A punitive bad conduct discharge may be adjudged for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 86, unauthorized absence for a period more than 30 days, upon conviction by a Special or General Court-Martial, in accordance with the Manual for Courts-Martial.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01078

    Original file (ND02-01078.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-01078 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020726, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant’s service was marred by award of one nonjudicial punishment, one summary court-martial, and an unauthorized absence for a period more than 30 days.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00609

    Original file (ND03-00609.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. In the absence of a discharge package, the Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C) and, after a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).Issue 1: The Applicant's discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00277

    Original file (ND02-00277.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00277 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020117, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions, entry level separation or uncharacterized. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Note: Entry marked withdrawn in service record, erroneous entry.010120: Applicant from unauthorized absence 0005, 20Jan01 (310 days/surrendered).010122: Charges preferred to special...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00336

    Original file (ND04-00336.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01289

    Original file (ND02-01289.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-01289 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020917, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 990917: Applicant to unauthorized absence 2400, 990917.000619: Applicant from unauthorized absence 1145, 000619 (276 days/surrendered).000825: Charges preferred to special court-martial for violation of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00109

    Original file (ND01-00109.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00109 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001031, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. My letter of explanation is attached.” Concerning a change in reenlistment code, the NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reentry into the naval service or any other of the Armed Forces.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00452

    Original file (ND02-00452.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00452 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020226, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Admin Discharge Package (6 pages) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00989

    Original file (ND03-00989.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00989 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030522. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The NDRB also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00033

    Original file (ND03-00033.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    980407: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-106. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19980407 under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial (A and B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00505

    Original file (ND04-00505.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 020329: Applicant reenlisted for six years on-board USS HARTFORD.030501: Discharged, DD214 issued reads: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL, reflecting unauthorized absence totaling 234 days.Applicant’s discharge package not in service recordPART III –...