Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00733
Original file (ND03-00733.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-SR, USN
Docket No. ND03-00733

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030319. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to “omit from my record.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040224. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge and the narrative reason shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“1. I don’t feel my discharge was improper, what I did was wrong I embarrassed myself, my family, and the navy when I got discharged I promised myself I would straighten up and I did I attended the divers institute of technology in Seattle, WA and I am currently working with company in Biloxi Mississippi. With all that has happened since Sept 11 and me looking for a career with excitement & benefits I am hoping to get my discharge upgraded.”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
DD Form 149

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     930115 - 930222  COG
         Active: USN                        None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 930223               Date of Discharge: 941209

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 09 17
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 20                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 56

 Highest Rate: SA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.20 (2)    Behavior: 3.00 (2)                OTA: 3 .20

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, SSDR, SASM, AFEM, BATTL “E”, .45 CAL Pistol Marksman

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

940729:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: UA 2200 940717 until 1801, 940718 (20 hours).
         Award: Forfeiture of $200.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 30 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
940730:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Violation of UCMJ, Article 86 UA as evidenced by CO’s NJP held on 940729.), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

941104:  NAVDRUGLAB, San Diego, CA, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 941031, tested positive for [Methamphetamine].
941110:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use of methamphetamine.
Award: Forfeiture of $416.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-1. No indication of appeal in the record.
941111:  Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Applicant found not dependent, recommended for separation. [Extracted from CO’s comments]
941112:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by a positive urinalysis sample as indicated on Navy Drug Laboratory San Diego message 042052 Nov 94.
941115:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
941120:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by a positive urinalysis sample as indicated on Navy Drug Laboratory San Diego message 042052 Nov 94.

941123:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Failure to go to restricted muster.
         Award: Forfeiture of $100.00 pay per month for 1 month. No indication of appeal in the record.

941201:  BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

941207:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Missing restricted personnel muster; violation of UCMJ, Article 91: Insubordinate conduct to a Petty Officer.
         Award: Forfeiture of $416.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days. No indication of appeal in the record.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19941209 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issue 1: The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing career opportunities as requested in the issue. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination on the propriety and equity of the discharge. In the Applicant’s case, the Board could discern no impropriety or inequity and therefore considered the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable. Additionally, the NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, will change the reason for discharge if such a change is warranted. The summary of service clearly documents that drug abuse was the reason the Applicant was discharged. No other Narrative Reason for Separation could more clearly describe why he was discharged. To change the Narrative Reason for Separation would be inappropriate. Relief denied.

There is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record, an alcohol-free lifestyle, and certification of community service and non-involvement with civil authorities are examples of verifiable proof that can be submitted.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.






Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9/94, effective
22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00425

    Original file (MD01-00425.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00425 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010220, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to General/under Honorable conditions. Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 112A: Specification: Wrongful use of marijuana, a controlled substance. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00311

    Original file (ND00-00311.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Age at Entry: 19 Years Contracted: 4 Education Level: 12 AFQT: 51 Highest Rate: HN Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Performance: 3.75 (4) Behavior: 3.85 (4) OTA: 3 .95 Military Decorations: None Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM Days of Unauthorized Absence: None Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620. Navy Military Personnel...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00677

    Original file (ND01-00677.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00677 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010420, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Relief based on this issue is not warranted.The applicant’s issue 3 states: “We refer this case to the Board for their careful and compassionate consideration and request the applicant's discharge be reviewed for Clemency due to post service.” The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the re...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01072

    Original file (ND00-01072.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    My discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident in 67 months of outstanding performance of service, as my enlisted service record indicate. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant states in issue 1 that his “discharge is inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident.” The Board found that the applicant...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00283

    Original file (ND03-00283.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Recommend being discharged from the Naval service. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19960505 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00076

    Original file (ND00-00076.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In issue 1, the applicant states that his “discharge was inequitable because it was based on one NJP incident in 6 years of service with no other adverse action”. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A), effective...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00968

    Original file (ND99-00968.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    921208: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, recommended applicant be retained. 950407: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00251

    Original file (ND02-00251.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 910221 - 910530 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 910531 Date of Discharge: 930222 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 08 22 Inactive: None CA action 930122: Sentence approved and ordered...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00428

    Original file (ND02-00428.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 021029. 871016: CNMPC directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 870828 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A).

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00997

    Original file (ND99-00997.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-SR, USN Docket No. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 950509 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A). medical diagnosis is not an issue upon which the NDRB can grant relief.