Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00730
Original file (ND03-00730.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-OSSR, USN
Docket No. ND03-00730

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030320. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a personal appearance hearing discharge review before the Board in the Washington National Capital Region. The Applicant listed Civilian Counsel as the representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040224. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: BAD CONDUCT/Convicted by special court martial, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 5815-010 (formerly 3640420).

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated
Issues submitted by Applicant’s counsel/representative ( CIVILIAN COUNSEL):
“1. The petitioner submits that he has been unjustly subjected to the imposition of a Bad Conduct Discharge by the United States Navy and respectfully requests that this Honorable board set aside said Bad Conduct Discharge and upgrade his discharge characterization to General, under Honorable Conditions.” (See Relevant Facts)

Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s Petition to NDRB (16 pages)
Enclosure A: Copy of Charge Sheets (2 pages)
Enclosure B: Copy of Investigating Officer’s Report (8 pages)
Enclosure C: Copy of Charge Sheets (3 pages)
Enclosure D: Request for Alternative Disposition in Lieu of Court Martial (2 pages)
Enclosure E: Response to Request for Alternative Disposition in Lieu of Court Martial (1 pages)
Enclosure F: Copy of Memorandum of Pretrial Agreement Part 1 and 2 (9 pages)
Enclosure G: Copy of Record of Trial (133 pages)
Enclosure H: Copy of Report of Results of Trial ( 2 pages)
Enclosure I: Copy of Comment on SJA Report and Request for Clemency (4 pages)
Enclosure J: Copy of Prisoner’s Acknowledgement of Sex Offenders Registration Requirements.
Enclosure K: Copy of Special Court Martial Order NO 13-00 (3 pages)
Enclosure L: Copy of NMCCMA Decision (2 pages)
Enclosure M: Copy of Special Court Martial Supplemental Order NO 01-1296 (1 page)
Enclosure N: Copy of Commanding Punitive Discharge Letter, Copies of DD Form 214 (3)
Enclosure O: Letter from Applicant, Letter from Applicant’s Mother (2 pages), Character Reference Letter from D_ A. M__, USAF dated June 6, 2002

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     970219 - 970909  COG
         Active: USN                        None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 970910               Date of Discharge: 011022

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 11 19
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4 (24 months extension)

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 62

 Highest Rate: OSSA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.00 (2)    Behavior: 3.00 (2)                OTA: 3.07

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: AFEM, AFSM, SSDR, NM, Rifle Marksmanship Medal, Pistol Marksmanship Medal [Extracted from Record of Trial]

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

BAD CONDUCT/Convicted by special court martial, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 5815-010 (formerly 3640420).

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

990824:  Special Court Martial
         Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 134: Disorderly conduct on or about 981212, by engaging in a game of “truth or dare” with the Gymstrata Hurricanes cheerleading team by placing his face between the breast of a female under the age of 16 years. Additional Charge: violation of the UCMJ, Article 134: Wrongfully commit an indecent act with a female under 16 years of age, and on or about 981212 by placing his face between and touching exposed breast.
         Findings: to Charge I and specification thereunder, guilty. Additional charge and specification 1 thereunder, guilty.
         Sentence: Confinement for 100 days, forfeiture of $500.00 per month for (5) months, reduction to E-1, Bad Conduct discharge.
         CA 000523: Only so much of the sentence as provides for confinement for 45 days, reduction in rate to pay grade E-1, forfeiture of $500.00 per month for three months, and the bad conduct discharge is approved, and except for bad conduct discharge, will be executed.
         SA: see SSPCMO.

990824:  Joined Naval Brig Norfolk, for confinement.

990930:  Released from confinement and restored to full duty.

010717:  NMCCCA: The findings of guilty and sentence, as approved on review,
         are affirmed.

011022:  SSPCMO: Article 71c, UCMJ, having been complied with, Bad Conduct discharge ordered executed.            

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant discharged in absentia on 20011022 with a bad conduct discharge which was the sentence adjudged by a properly convened special court-martial. That sentence was subsequently approved by both the convening and appellate review authorities (A and (B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C).

Issue 1: In response to the Applicant's issue, relevant and material details stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case tried under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based upon clemency only (C, Part IV). The Applicant's case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. The service records that the Board reviewed showed no mitigating or extenuating factors sufficient to offset the seriousness of the offenses for which the discharge was awarded. Relief is therefore denied.

There is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record, and certification of community service and non-involvement with civil authorities are examples of verifiable proof that can be submitted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of he discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 22, effective 15 Dec 98 to 21 Aug 2002, Article 5815-010 (formerly 3640420), Executing a Dishonorable or Bad Conduct Discharge.

B. The Manual for courts-martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 1 34, disorderly conduct, and wrongfully commit an indecent act with a female under 16 years of age .

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.
PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00105

    Original file (ND02-00105.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: BAD CONDUCT/Convicted by special court martial, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 5815-010 (formerly 3640420).The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214. (Equity Issue) Pursuant to 10 USC 874 (b) (UCMJ, Article 74) and in accordance with SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraphs 2.24 and 9.3, this former member requests the Board’s clemency relief with up-grade of his characterization of service to under honorable conditions on...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00173

    Original file (ND03-00173.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Equity Issue) Pursuant to 10 USC 874 (b) (UCMJ, Article 74) and in accordance with SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraphs 2.24 and 9.3, this former member requests the Board’s clemency relief with up-grade of his characterization of service on the basis of his post-service conduct.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (2) Letter from Applicant, dated October 1,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01068

    Original file (ND03-01068.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION No indication of appeal in the record.980807: To pre-trial confinement 981002: Special Court Martial [trial dates 980929 – 981002] Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 90. The Manual for courts-martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 90 [ Willful disobedience of a superior commissioned...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00629

    Original file (ND04-00629.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION After a thorough review of the Applicant’s record, issues submitted, and post service accomplishments, the Board determined that clemency was not warranted and that the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offenses he committed. The Manual for courts-martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court martial for violation...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00268

    Original file (ND04-00268.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00268 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031209. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20000321 with a bad conduct discharge which was the sentence adjudged by a properly convened special court-martial.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00550

    Original file (ND03-00550.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00550 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030214. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Naval Council of Personnel Boards Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00997

    Original file (ND03-00997.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copies of DD Form 214 (2) DD Form 149 Letter from D. L. K___, Board for Correction of Naval Records to MS K____ S. J___ PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 970530 - 970729 COG Active: USN None Period of Service Under Review :Date of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00419

    Original file (ND02-00419.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00419 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020221, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500938

    Original file (ND0500938.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application: “Poor legal representation & lack of speedy trial.” Documentation Only the service record was were reviewed. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the Applicant’s issues were insufficient to merit clemency (C).

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00565

    Original file (ND01-00565.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D). The applicant’s eighth issue states: “I have received treatment and ready to come back home in the navy.” The applicant failed to provide documentary evidence to support his sobriety and post service accomplishments. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community...