Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00285
Original file (ND03-00285.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-CTTSA, USN
Docket No. ND03-00285

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 20021205, requested that reason for the discharge be changed to “something general or less damaging.” The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20031017. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the narrative reason of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: HONORABLE/Other physical/mental conditions - personality disorder, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3620200.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated
Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“1. This is an honorable discharge which is ok, but the wording for discharge i.e. personality disorder is and sounds harsh. If there were different wording such as just a general honorable or something to that effect would be greatly appreciated. I have found out later and after the fact that I do have slight ADD with depression was the factors I was dealing with at the time. For now I will await the outcome of this, and hopefully you can accommodate me with this. I would be grateful, if not I’ll pursue the reasons + situations that the Navy didn’t acknowledge the depression and help me with it.

Thank you,”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214, Member 1 and 4

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     890214 - 890313  COG
         Active: USN                        None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 890314               Date of Discharge: 900618

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 02 25
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 20                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 14                        AFQT: 51/66

 Highest Rate: CTTSN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 2.80 (1)    Behavior: 2.80 (1)                OTA: 3.00

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 20

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

HONORABLE/Other physical/mental conditions - personality disorder, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3620200.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

900326:  To UA.

900416:  Surrendered to military authorities at PERSUPPACTDET Denver, CO at 0800.
900425:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 0630, 26 March 90 to 0800, 16 April 90.
         Award: Forfeiture of $405 per month for 2 months, correctional custody for 30 days, reduction to E-2. No indication of appeal in the record.
900501:  Applicant diagnosed with a personality disorder, NOS with avoidant and passive aggressive features. The psychiatrist recommended separation based on a personality disorder of such severity as to render the Applicant incapable of serving adequately in the naval service. Applicant was considered self-destructive and a continuing risk of harm to self.

900523:  Applicant assessed with a personality disorder, NOS with dependent and passive aggressive features. The psychiatrist recommended expeditious separation based on a personality disorder of such severity as to render the Applicant incapable of serving adequately in the naval service. Applicant was considered self-destructive and a continuing risk of harm to self and others.

900605:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under honorable conditions (general) by reason of convenience of the government on the basis of a diagnosed personality disorder of such severity as to render the Applicant incapable of serving adequately in the naval service as evidenced by a military psychiatrist’s medical diagnosis of 1 May 90.
900605:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
900606:  Commanding Officer directed an honorable discharge by reason of convenience of the government on the basis of a diagnosed personality disorder of such severity as to render the Applicant incapable of serving adequately in the naval service.


PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was honorably discharged on 19900618 for convenience of the government on the basis of a diagnosed personality disorder of such severity as to render the Applicant incapable of serving adequately in the naval service (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

Issue 1. On 1 May 1990 a military psychiatrist diagnosed the Applicant to possess a personality disorder. This diagnosis, along with another on 23 May 1990, was the basis for the Applicant’s administrative separation. No other narrative reason more clearly describes the circumstances surrounding the Applicant’s processing for administrative separation. Relief denied.

The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.



Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A), Change 11, effective
14 Jun 90 until 11 Oct 90, Article 3620200, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL FOR CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT.
B . NAVOP 013/87 (CNO 201614ZFEB87) Delegated authority to Special Court-Martial Convening Authorities (SPCMCA's) to administratively separate enlisted members in certain circumstances. Authority was delegated for separation of enlisted members with Honorable, General, or Entry Level discharges for the following reasons where member does not object to the separation.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00828

    Original file (ND00-00828.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.910606: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge general (under honorable conditions) by reason of convenience of the government on the basis of a diagnosed personality disorder of such severity as to render the applicant incapable of serving adequately in the naval service as evidenced by a diagnosed personality disorder of such severity as to represent a continuing risk to self and others.910606: Applicant advised of his rights and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00385

    Original file (ND99-00385.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This servicemember has a personality disorder that renders him at continuing risk for engagement in maladaptive or potentially self-injurious behavior. The Board cannot alter history, and at the time the applicant was discharged, a qualified medical officer determined that the applicant had a personality disorder that rendered him a continuing risk of potentially self-injurious behavior, reacting to psychological stress maladaptively and with poor potential for future service. In the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01393

    Original file (ND03-01393.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-01393 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030820. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. “Equity Issue: Based on our review of evidentiary record and on behalf of this former member, we request that the Board consider provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of this...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01364

    Original file (ND03-01364.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I mistakingly signed a form without writing down an outstanding phone bill. The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits not the Navy Discharge Review Board. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Naval Council of Personnel Boards Attn:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00879

    Original file (ND01-00879.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00879 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010625, requested that the reason for the discharge be changed to Hardship/RE-1. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of applicant's DD Form 214 Copy of Department of the Army and Air Force National Guard Bureau, report of separation and record of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00742

    Original file (ND00-00742.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00742 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000523, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Relief is denied.The applicant’s second issue states: “Request change of reenlistment code as to not prevent reenlistment in the Navy.” The NDRB can not change reenlistment codes.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01036

    Original file (ND99-01036.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 910119 under honorable conditions (general) for convenience of the government on the basis of a diagnosed personality disorder of such severity as to render the applicant incapable of serving adequately...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00363

    Original file (ND00-00363.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00363 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000201, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to Secretarial Authority. ), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.931207: Medical officer statement: Applicant diagnosed with Axis I: Adjustment disorder with mixed emotional...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00437

    Original file (ND99-00437.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    960816: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge general (under honorable conditions) by reason of convenience of the government on the basis of a diagnosed personality disorder of such severity as to render the applicant incapable of serving adequately in the naval service, misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct based on two NJP's in your current enlistment and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense by violation of UCMJ Articles 92 and 91.960816: Applicant...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01164

    Original file (ND99-01164.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I was discharged. UTCN (applicant) was officially notified on 7 September 1996 that he was being processed for administrative separation by reason of convenience of the government on the basis of personality disorder and he waived his right to General Courts-Martial Convening Authority review. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In the applicant’s...