Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01517
Original file (MD03-01517.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PVT, USMC
Docket No. MD03-01517

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030924. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a personal appearance hearing discharge review before the Board in the Washington National Capital Region. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Board first conducts a documentary record review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040617. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE/COURT-MARTIAL, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 1105.


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated
 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:
 1. This letter is to two groups of people. The first group is the people that have the authority to upgrade my discharge so that I can get back into the USMC. The second group is everyone else in the United States armed forces. Here we go. I want to apologize to everyone for the course I took about six and a half years ago. There is no word, phrase, or action that can be used to express the level of shame, disappointment, or embarrassment I have experienced . As we all know, young people can make some pretty dumb decisions that can possibly affect them for the rest of their lives. I was one of those young people. I was given the opportunity of my life. I was able to serve in the United States Marine Corps. Somewhere along the line, something tragic happened. I lost my focus. I forgot what a great thing I had. I did not listen to what anyone told me and started doing things “my own way” (the wrong way). Of course I knew what was best for me. WRONG! ! Sir or ma’am, some people make mistakes in their lives and die with that mistake never having tried to correct it. I know it has taken me a long time, but I have decided to do whatever it takes, legal and moral, to correct the most major mistake of my life. Do I deserve this monumental chance at redemption? Some people would say most definitely not. Other people would say yes. I believe in a second chance. Otherwise I could not write this letter. My feelings probably have very little to do with the decision that you will make but ever since I decided to do this I have felt a thousand times better about life. I was raised in the Marine Corps and I have always loved the Marine Corps.
Knowing this, I get on my knees and beg you. Please upgrade my discharge so that I can live a happier, fuller life IN the United States Marines Corps. In exchange, I give you my all. This includes my heart, my body, my dedication, commitment and loyalty forever. You and everyone else (in the Marine Corps and civilians) WILL NOT BE SORRY. I promise you that.
Once a Marine ALWAYS a Marine!!!!

 Again, please help me to make this right. Everything this letter says boils down to this: It is not just about upgrading my discharge. It is about having the opportunity to re-enlist into the USMC. Then life begins.

Sincerely,
T_ L_ C_ jr ”

Documentation
 In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active:
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                951006 - 951022  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 951023               Date of Discharge: 970910

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 11 17 [Does not exclude lost time]
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 84

 Highest Rank: PVT

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.5 (1)                       Conduct: 4.5 (1)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM

Days of Unauthorized Absence: 77

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE/COURT-MARTIAL, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 1105.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :
960324:  To unauthorized absence.

960704:  From unauthorized absence. Surrendered SOI, Camp Pen.
        
960702:  Special Court-Martial.
         Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 (1 Specification):
         Specification 1: UA fr 24 Mar 96 to 10 June 96
         Findings: to Charge I and specification 1 thereunder, guilty.
         Sentence: 30 days confinement and a bad conduct discharge.
         CA 961119: Sentence approved and ordered executed except for the BCD.
        
970530:  NMCCMR: Affirmed findings and sentence.

971010:  SSPCMO: Article 71c, UCMJ, having been complied with, Bad Conduct discharge ordered executed.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19970910 with a bad conduct discharge which was the sentence adjudged by a properly convened special court-martial. That sentence was subsequently approved by both the convening and appellate review authorities (A and (B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C).

Issue 1. The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and/or the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. There is no evidence of impropriety or inequity in the Applicant’s discharge. The Applicant’s misconduct is clearly documented. Therefore, relief is denied.

Concerning a change in reenlistment code, the NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reentry into the naval service or any other of the Armed Forces. The NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy or Marine Corps. Reenlistment policy of the naval service is promulgated by the Commandant, United States Marine Corps, Code MMEA, 3280 Russell Road, Quantico, VA 22134. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable "RE" code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter.

The following is provided for the edification of the Applicant. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural error or inequity must have occurred during the discharge process for the period of enlistment in question. The Board discovered no such errors after a review of Applicant’s case. There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded, based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving naval service. The NDRB is authorized, however, to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider. Therefore, no relief is appropriate.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 1105, DISCHARGE ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE OF COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 950818 until present.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence for more than 30 days.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.


PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01480

    Original file (MD03-01480.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Letter from VFW Résumé College transcript Note from Applicant PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 880707 - 890618 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 890619 Date of Discharge: 941115 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 05...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01209

    Original file (MD04-01209.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-01209 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040723. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence for more than 30 days.

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00472

    Original file (MD00-00472.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Sentence: Confinement for 45 days, reduction to E-1, and a bad conduct discharge. Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)A. Paragraph 1105, DISCHARGE ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE OF COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 950818 until present.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00525

    Original file (MD02-00525.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00525 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020305, requested that the characterization of service and reason for discharge be changed. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC None Inactive: USMCR(J) 891006 - 900312 COG Period of Service Under...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500454

    Original file (MD0500454.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD05-00454 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050112. After a thorough review of the Applicant’s record, issues submitted, and post service accomplishments, the Board determined that clemency was not warranted and that the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offenses he committed. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01027

    Original file (MD01-01027.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I would like to ask the Board for an upgrade in my discharge; my issues are I was an honest marine up until the one and only mistake I have ever made in my life. (Signed by the Applicant)Dear Chairperson:After review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of the evidence assembled for review, the FSM request to have his discharge upgraded from Bad Conduct Discharge to one of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501419

    Original file (MD0501419.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD05-01419 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050825. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a, (wrongful use of a controlled...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501423

    Original file (MD0501423.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:“The reason a change is requested is because one mistake in a person life for making a bad decision shouldn’t affect his whole life and keep it on his/her record. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20040617 with a bad conduct discharge which was the sentence adjudged by a properly convened special court-martial. Only the Board for Correction of Naval...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00994

    Original file (MD00-00994.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In the applicant’s issues 1 and 2, the Board found that good conduct and proficiency marks, as well as his recruiting three Marine recruits notwithstanding, the applicant’s discharge was based on his violation of Article 86, UCMJ and his subsequent Special Court Martial conviction. In the applicant’s final issue, 8,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00184

    Original file (MD04-00184.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00184 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031107. I realize now that when I enlisted into the military that I was only 19 yrs. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20000906 with a bad conduct discharge which was the sentence adjudged by a properly convened special court-martial.