Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01062
Original file (MD03-01062.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-PVT, USMC
Docket No. MD03-01062

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030528. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a personal appearance discharge review before a traveling panel closest to Nashville, TN. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) does not travel; all hearings are held in the Washington DC area. Additionally, the Applicant was advised the NDRB first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040812. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNCHARACTERIZED/ENTRY LEVEL PERFORMANCE AND CONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6205.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues, as stated
Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:
Issue 1: “To: Military Review Board

 From: J_ S. W_ ( Applicant )
RE: DD 214 Up-Grade Request

I J_ S. W_ ( Applicant ), social security number (social security number deleted) request my Military Discharge Document DD 214 be up-graded to Honorable based upon the following documented evidence:
In December 2001 I was released and cleared for full duty by my orthopedic surgeon who did my Orthroscopic surgery in 1998. (SEE ENCLOSED RELEASE) In December 2001 I was processed through MEPS and was cleared for enlistment. (SEE ENCLOSED MEPS PHYSICAL) I enlisted in good faith to serve my country proud.
I was discharged for a Medical Condition Not for for Entry Level Performance and Conduct, As you know my medical condition was the reason I could not perform Physical Training as required by Military Basic Training Regulations. Poor or Bad Conduct never entered into the equation.
Thanks in advance for correcting this major DD 214 error.

 J_ S. W_ ( Applicant )”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214
Evaluation, dated December 26, 2001
 Job/character reference, dated March 5, 2003
 Job/character reference, dated March 6, 2003

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
          Inactive: USMCR (J)               020107 - 020630  COG
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 020701               Date of Discharge: 020913

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 02 13
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4
Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 45

 Highest Rank: PVT
Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: NMA*                          Conduct: NMA
Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None
Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 *No marks assigned.
Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNCHARACTERIZED/ENTRY LEVEL PERFORMANCE AND CONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6205.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

020802:  NAVHOSP, Beaufort, SC: Applicant with complaint of right knee pain.
020812:  NAVHOSP, Beaufort, SC: Assessment: Right knee tendonitis.
020814:  Consultation sheet: Applicant with right knee pain due to twisting injury for 2 weeks. Provisional Dx: R internal derangement, rule out partial ACL tear.
020814:  NAVHOSP, Beaufort, SC: Assessment: Right internal derangement.

 020814:  NAVHOSP, Beaufort, SC: Assessment: Right knee pain. EPTE. History of Arthroscopy. P: To sports medicine.

020820:  Medical Entry: MRI of right knee. Impression: 1) Finding consistent with an ACL tear from it’s femoral attachment. 2) Findings suggestive of previous medial meniscal repair. 3) Area of marrow edema in the proximal tibia anterior to the posterior cruciate insertion, probably enthesopathic change. 4) Minimal joint effusion.

 020827:  NAVHOSP, Beaufort, SC: Present sports medicine due to follow up for right knee evaluation.

020906:  Medical Disposition Officer: Applicant qualified for discharge.

 020913:  DD Form 214: Applicant discharged with an uncharacterized (entry level separation) by reason entry-level performance and conduct.
Applicant’s discharge package missing from service record.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20020913 with an uncharacterized due to entry-level performance and conduct (A). In the absence of a discharge package, the Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B) and, after a thorough review of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).
Issue 1: By regulation, members discharged within the first 180 days of enlistment are given a service characterization of “Uncharacterized” unless there were unusual circumstances regarding performance or conduct, which would merit an “honorable” characterization. The Applicant’s service record did not contain any unusual circumstances during his two months and thirteen days in the military to warrant a change of discharge to “honorable.” After receiving the full extent of conservative medical care the Applicant failed to recover sufficiently in order to carry out his military duties. He could no longer meet the minimum physical qualifications for military service and was appropriately released from his service obligation. Relief denied.

With respect to nonservice-related administrative matters, i.e., VA benefits, civilian employment, educational pursuits, etc., an uncharacterized separation shall be considered the equivalent of an honorable or general (under honorable conditions) discharge.
  
The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F effective
01 September 2001 until Present, paragraph 6205, ENTRY LEVEL PERFORMANCE AND CONDUCT.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.
D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                   Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                   Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00106

    Original file (ND01-00106.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-SN, USN Docket No. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. I never had problems with my knee before training.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01087

    Original file (MD02-01087.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-01087 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020725, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Assessment: History of PFS/ITBS, left knee.

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00993

    Original file (MD00-00993.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :961113: Report of Medical Examination upon entry: Applicant failed to disclose internal derangement left knee.961126: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with an uncharacterized by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to a fraudulent entry into the U.S. Marine Corps.961126: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01310

    Original file (MD02-01310.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-01310A Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20020909. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to medical – entry level separation. “On behalf of the above referenced applicant, and in accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166; SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600604

    Original file (MD0600604.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Period of Limited Duty: 8 months. Follow up: as needed.Final Disposition: PT is found FFD w/the following limitations – partial PT only, no running – no forced marches. Bilateral knee joint pain in the patellofemoral region, worse while walking, while running, while jumping, started gradually, occurs at rest, worse on rising from a seated position, knee joint stiffness, and a grating sensation I the knee but no knee joint swelling, able to straighten the knee, and the knee did not suddenly...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00127

    Original file (MD02-00127.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I, (applicant) respectfully request review and upgrade of my Uncharacterized Discharge from the United States Marine Corps. Reports swelling fluctuates over time. Recruit reports that her left leg has always been larger than her right due to swelling.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01094

    Original file (ND02-01094.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-01094 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020801, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed. The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. My evidence of this situation is Lt. P_ of the USS Truman who went out the way to help me talk to my wife and my wife harassment...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00079

    Original file (MD04-00079.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00079 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031014. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500955

    Original file (MD0500955.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00544

    Original file (MD04-00544.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requested the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The doctor I saw at Parris Island, Dr. B_, recommended that I be granted an entry level separation. 010209: GCMCA [Commanding General, Marine Corps Recruit Depot/Eastern Recruiting Region] directed the Applicant's discharge with an uncharacterized (entry level) by reason entry-level performance and conduct.