Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00888
Original file (MD03-00888.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-2ndLT, USMCR
Docket No. MD03-00888

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030409. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a personal appearance hearing in the Washington National Capital Region. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Board first conducts a documentary record review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040401. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/UNACCEPTABLE CONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 4104 and SECNAVINST 1920.6B.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“Issues to address:

One accusation that was never proven and was based on circumstantial evidence ended my career in the Marine Corps. Due to an outstanding service record throughout my time in the Marine Corps, I ask that my case be reviewed thoroughly. I request an upgrade to an honorable discharge and reinstatement with current time and grade and flight status.

1. I requested to speak to my Commanding Officer on several occasions throughout the investigation, but was never afforded the opportunity to do so.

2. I was coached by my Command’s JAG Officer on what to say and to cooperate with the Command on the evidence against another Lt. In return, he said my Commanding Officer would give me a letter of reprimand and I would resume my career. Consequently, the charges were dropped against me, then a week or so later I was given paperwork to process me for an administrative separation.

3. The lack of time due to a Change of Command at TBS played a crucial but damaging role in my defense.

(Please see attachment for further statement and details)”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s Official Test Results, Basic School Quantico dtd Jun 5, 2001
Applicant’s Age Waiver for Naval Aviation Program dtd Oct 19, 2000
Applicant’s further statement/details concerning discharge (undated) (3 pages)
Applicant’s Coached Statement (undated) (2 pages)
Applicant’s Official Request for Resignation for Cause dtd Jun 12, 2001
 Applicant’s Rebuttal to Notification Requesting an Honorable Discharge dtd Jun 12, 2001 (4 pages)
 K_ and Applicant’s (P_) test pages
Applicant’s Statement dtd Apr 20, 2001
CO, The Basic School, ltr to Trial Counsel, dtd May 1, 2001
Applicant’s Statement dtd May 2, 2001
Applicant Administrative Discharge Notification dtd May 30, 2001
Applicant’s Test Answer Page (2 pages)
Applicant’s photo
Applicant’s autobiography dtd May 22, 2000
Applicant’s Counseling Chronology
Applicant’s Student Totals Report, The Basic School dtd Nov 28, 2000
Applicant’s Leadership Performance Worksheet/command evaluations/academic counseling (33 pages)
HQMC MOS Recommendation Roster dtd Oct 17, 2000
31 Character Reference letters from Marine Corps officers
Applicant’s Verification of Military Experience and Training dtd Apr 1, 2001 (12 pages)
Congressional correspondence (3 pages)
Letter from Applicant to congressman
Letter from HQMC, dtd Jan 9, 2004

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC              980323 - 000406  HON (To accept commission)
          Inactive: USMCR(J)                980304 - 980322  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Commission: 000407               Date of Discharge: 020405

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 11 28
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 28                         

Education Level: 16                        AFQT: 80

 Highest Rank: 2ndLT

 Final Officer Performance Evaluation Averages : All officer performance reports were available to the Board for review.

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: N&MCAM, CoC, MM, Rifle Expert Badge, Pistol Expert Badge

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/UNACCEPTABLE CONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 4104 & SECNAVINST 1920.6B.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

001117:  Applicant was alleged to have cheated on Leadership and Administration exam and the command ordered an investigation. Investigating officer concluded that the officers cheated. [Extracted from the Commandant of the Marine Corps’ letter to the Secretary of the Navy, dated February 11, 2002].

001129:  Applicant was offered nonjudicial punishment, but refused and the case was forwarded to an Article 32 Investigation where the investigating officer determined that there was sufficient evidence to support charges of false official statement and conduct unbecoming in violation of Articles 107 and 133 of the UCMJ and refer the case to a general court-martial. The investigating officer recommended disposing of the offenses at NJP; and if Applicant refused NJP, the investigating officer further recommended that a Board of Inquiry be convened. [Extracted from the Commandant of the Marine Corps’ letter to the Secretary of the Navy, dated February 11, 2002].
010530:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with a general under honorable conditions by reason of substandard performance of duty and misconduct. Specific reasons are (1) failing to demonstrate the acceptable qualities of a leader, (2) failure to satisfactorily complete a course of instruction, and (3) commission of a military or civilian offense(s) punishable by confinement of six months or more. Specifically, cheating on the Leadership and Administration exam, cheating on the Amphibious Operations exam, and violating a General Order by failing to report misconduct. [Provided by the Applicant.]
010612:  Applicant voluntarily tendered his qualified resignation in lieu of processing for administrative separation for cause, and further requested an honorable discharge. [Provided by the Applicant.]

010612:  Applicant’s rebuttal to the administrative separation notification and request for an honorable discharge. [Provided by the Applicant.]
010717:  Commanding officer recommended approval of Applicant’s request for resignation, but recommended discharge with a general (under honorable conditions) due to substandard performance of duty and misconduct.

010910:  Commanding General, Marine Corps Education Command, recommended Applicant’s qualified resignation request be accepted, and that he be separated from the Marine Corps with a General (Under Honorable Conditions); and if resignation is not accepted, Applicant be required to show cause for retention.

011015:  Commanding General, Training and Education Command, recommended Applicant’s qualified resignation request be accepted, and that he be separated from the Marine Corps with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service.

011214:  Commanding General, Marine Corps Combat Development Command, recommended Applicant’s qualified resignation request be accepted, and that he be separated from the Marine Corps with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service.

020211:  Commandant of the Marine Corps recommended to the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (ASN) acceptance of Applicant’s qualified resignation and that he be involuntary discharged with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) by reason of unacceptable conduct.

020228:  ASN (M&RA) approved Applicant's discharge, as requested.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20020405 with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) due to unacceptable conduct (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

Issues 1-3. A characterization of service of under honorable conditions (general) is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member's conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member's military record. T he Applicant’s service was marred by his unacceptable conduct while a student at TBS. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his disobedience of the orders and directives which regulate good order and discipline in the naval service, and falls short of that required for an honorable characterization of service. An upgrade to honorable is inappropriate. Relief denied.
The statements and documentation provided by the Applicant do not refute the presumption of regularity in this case. The Board found no indication in the record that the Applicant was improperly or inequitably denied any right or process regarding his administrative separation. Relief denied.

The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of service in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s service. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.









Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Chapter 4, Paragraph 4104 of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO p1900.16E) effective 18 August 1995 until present, RETIREMENT OR RESIGNATION.

 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 1920.6B (ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION OF OFFICERS) effective 13 Dec 1999 until Present establishes policies, standards and procedures for the administrative separation of Navy and Marine Corps officers from the naval service in accordance with Title 10, United States Code and DoD Directive 1332.30 of 14 Mar 97.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01305

    Original file (MD02-01305.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ]010628: Commanding Officer, Basic School, Marine Corps Combat Development Command, Quantico, VA, recommended Applicant's retention in lieu of separation for misconduct due to civilian conviction of two counts of indecent exposure and failing to demonstrate acceptable qualities of leadership required of an officer in his grade when he lied to a police officer. 011015: CG, Training and Education Command, recommended Applicant be administratively separated as a probationary officer and his...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00751

    Original file (MD01-00751.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's representative requested that the reason for separation be change to "Secretarial Authority". Dear members of the board: The following issues are the reasons my discharge should be upgraded from a general discharge to an honorable discharge. Additionally, advised applicant is submitting a letter of resignation and requested leave awaiting separation.990730: Applicant tendered a resignation of commission in lieu of processing for administrative separation for cause,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501120

    Original file (MD0501120.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. This letter and supporting documentation is my personal request for a review of my discharge issued by the United States Marine Corps, though the Secretary of the Navy, on 15 October 2003. While there is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600629

    Original file (MD0600629.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The reasons for the Applicant’s separation are misconduct, specifically, unauthorized absence and failure to demonstrate acceptable qualities of a leader.040726: Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel, elected to tender a resignation.040806: Commanding Officer, The Basic School, Report of NJP and Request for Administrative Separation in the Case of Second Lieutenant D_ E. __ (Applicant). If his resignation is not accepted, I recommend he be involuntarily separated...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00603

    Original file (MD02-00603.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    000406: Applicant elected not to appeal the imposition of NJP, but elected to submit a request for resignation in lieu of administrative separation processing.000410: Punitive Letter of Reprimand issued to Applicant.000410: Applicant requested appeal of the non-judicial punishment.undated: Commanding Officer reported to CMC Applicant's non-judicial punishment and recommended Applicant be required to show cause for retention through the notification procedures, Applicant's request for...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501538

    Original file (MD0501538.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 980202: Applicant appointed as a Warrant Officer in the United States Marine Corps.980727: NOTIFICATION OF ARTICLE 15, UCMJ, HEARING from Commanding General, 2d Force Service Support Group to the Applicant. The Applicant understands that he could be administratively separated from the U.S. Marine Corps with an other than honorable (characterization of service) discharge based on the findings and recommendations of a Board of Inquiry...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500419

    Original file (MD0500419.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By unanimous vote, the BOI recommended that that Applicant be separated from the naval service for the reasons listed above and the service be characterized as other than honorable.020211: Applicant’s request denied. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (B and C).The Applicant contends that his discharge was improper because the Board of Inquiry (BOI), which...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501228

    Original file (MD0501228.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Marine Corps and Secretary of the Navy denied Applicant the legally required examination of all his records prior to issuing an Other Than Honorable Discharge rendering the discharge invalid. In this case Captain M_(Applicant) “ requested ” an Honorable Discharge. SECNAV Instruction 1920.6B (on encl (1)) In this case the Marine Corps wants to separate a Marine Officer for cause with an Other Than Honorable Discharge.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00703

    Original file (MD03-00703.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00703 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030310. "It also states on page 1-17 section 1202 item g “Return to full duty those Marines who successfully complete an appropriate treatment program.” and continues to item h “Process for administrative separation those Marines who do not successfully complete or refuse appropriate treatment programs or who are unable to achieve/maintain accepted Marine Corps standards of performance and/or conduct after...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01359

    Original file (MD03-01359.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to “Resigned.” The Applicant requests a documentary record review. ]011210: CG, I MEF, forwarded the NJP report to the Commandant, Marine Corps, concurring with the recommendation that Applicant not be required to show case for retention, but disagreed the with recommendation that Applicant be discharged with an Honorable, but...