Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00852
Original file (MD03-00852.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PFC, USMC
Docket No. MD03-00852

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030409. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040312. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

 1. “I was a member of the United States Marine Corps from 1999 until 2001, at which time I feel I was unfairly given an Under Other Than Honorable Discharge.

This came about from a conversation I had with a fellow Marine joking with him that I had tried the drug ecstasy. I had never taken this drug but he took me seriously and reported me to my superiors. After returning to Kaneohe Marine Corps Base from a detachment to California, I was pulled aside the next morning by Naval Criminal Investigation Services and required to take a hair follicle test. The agents at NCIS said I had tested positive for the drug even though I later found out by a Navy Corpsman that this is not a very accurate test. I was told by NCIS that if I would just admit using ecstacy and give them the names of other people that were using it, they would cut me a deal so I could remain in the Marines. Since I never used the drug or knew of anyone using it I had nothing to tell them. They said they had the test results, of which I never got to see, and gave these results to my command, 1 st Radio Battalion. Upon receiving the test results, 1st Sgt. S_, took it upon herself to immediately process me for discharge.
I went to JAG to try to get some help because I knew of another Marine, D_ H_, who had been caught with marijuana and was put on restriction and got to return to active duty and was not thrown out of the Marines.
I told the JAG officer my situation. He counseled me to plead guilty, that way I would “only” get restriction and an Under Other Than Honorable Discharge as opposed to brig time and a Bad Conduct Discharge, which I was very scared of getting.
When the day came for my NJP, I stood in front of Lt. Col. D_ and received my punishment which consisted of 45 days restriction, 45 days EPD, loss of rank and pay. The people present for my NJP were: Lt. Col. D_, Sgt. Major M_, 1st Sgt. S_, Gunnery Sgt. M_ and Gunnery Sgt. C_. After doing my restriction and extra punitive duty I was discharged and given a plane ticket and sent home.
At home I was trying to get my life back together when this past year I received a phone call from one of my former Marine friends, J_ H_. He informed me that Lt Col. D_, Sgt. Major M_ and 1 st Sgt. S_ were forced by the Marines to retire early due to the fact that they were issuing NJP’s to Marines for nonsense charges. Upon hearing this I went to the Marine recruiter in Evansville, IN. (My parents had moved to Indiana in 2001 and when I switched trucking companies I moved with them) I told Staff Sgt. D_ my situation and he told me to try and see if one of my state representatives could help me return to the Marine Corps. I wrote a letter to Congressman J_ H_ to see if he could help. A member of his staff, A_ N_, found out that I would have to apply to the Naval Review Board for a change in my type of discharge.
My father retired from the Navy and that was my intent when I was in the Marines. I enjoyed my work and believe I was good at it. I also understand the situation the United States is in right now and though that is not my main reason to rejoin, I would be honored to help my country. I want to make my family proud of me and have a stable job. At present I work for a company that makes MRE’s, Ameriqual. I feel I am helping the war effort but when the war is over I do not know if my job will be secure.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I will be anxiously waiting your decision.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 990113               Date of Discharge: 010706

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 05 24
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 20                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 45

 Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.3 (7)                       Conduct: 4.0 (7)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: SSDR

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

990108:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
010221:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Financial responsibilities. Specifically, your inability to pay your debts in a timely and consistent manner, thus causing this command to receive letters of indebtedness and phone calls from creditors regarding your debts.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
010601:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A (3 specs):
 Specification 1: Wrongfully use “Ecstasy” on 2200, 010302.
Specification 2: Wrongfully use “Ecstasy” on 2230, 010407.
Specification 3: Wrongfully use “Ecstasy” on 2230, 010317.
Awarded forfeiture of $500.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duties for 45 days, reduction to PFC. Not appealed.
010618:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
010618:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.

010626:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was a violation of the UCMJ, specifically wrongful use of MDMA (ecstasy).

010629:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

0107XX:  GCMCA [Commanding General, Marine Corps Base Hawaii] directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20010706 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).
Issue 1. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. The Applicant’s claim that he never used illegal drugs and that his chain of command was unjust do not refute the presumption of regularity in this case. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.
The NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Naval Service or any other branch of the Armed Forces. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter.

The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.










Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 31 Jan 97 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00355

    Original file (ND04-00355.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00355 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031218. Chief H_ was not designated in writing by the Commanding Officer to be the command UPC until 06 Nov. 2002, which is over two months after this test was taken. (PAGE 9) Exhibit B 7.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501420

    Original file (MD0501420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). After I told the men in my command that I had taken the drugs. The NDRB advises that there was no impropriety in his administrative separation for misconduct due to drug abuse, despite the evidence of record showing that the Applicant’s test result came back negative for controlled substances.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00814

    Original file (MD03-00814.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The issue presented in this Application is whether or not my Bad Conduct Discharge from the U.S. Marine Corps, which was adjudged at a special court martial on 8 August 1990, should be upgraded to Honorable. However, at the time I requested relief, my discharge had recently been adjudged and the Board properly found that I failed to introduce new evidence of sufficient merit to extenuate, mitigate, or excuse the misconduct of my record, which was a 306 day unauthorized absence.It has how...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00926

    Original file (MD04-00926.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1 ) through ( 5 ).” On enclosure 17 par 2 line 1 enclosures now become “( 1 ) through ( 7 ).” The reason I bring this to your attention is after receiving the first letter denying discharge, Lt H_, 1 st Sgt C_ and myself sat down to discuss what the Marine Corps intention was with me. 2 line I there is “reviewed enclosures ( 1 ) through ( 5 ).” On enclosure 17 par 2 line 1 enclosures now become “( 1 ) through ( 7 ).” It is my belief that the additional documents contained information about...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01147

    Original file (MD03-01147.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. 020617: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.020617: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600383

    Original file (ND0600383.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND06-00383 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20060104. I already knew that she was getting tired of being alone and that she could not bare it anymore but there was not much I could do at that point in time because I was not near San Diego to help out, I do remember trying to got a hold of the Duty Office back on base at some point to talk to someone about this but no one was there to answer my phone call. He told me that he was sorry again for what...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501573

    Original file (MD0501573.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. Mercer County Veteran Services” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Thirteen pages from applicant’s service record Applicant’s DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501190

    Original file (MD0501190.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD05-01190 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050706. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. 030519: GCMCA, Commanding General, Marine Corps Base Hawaii directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct drug abuse.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00810

    Original file (MD03-00810.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. A_ D_ H_ (Applicant).” Per enclosure (7), PFC H_’s (Applicant) specimen tested positive for marijuana.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00849

    Original file (MD03-00849.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or entry level separation or uncharacterized and the reason for the discharge be changed to SECRETARY AUTHORITY. I was in the Marine Corps for five years and nine months and in only four week’s as a drill instructor in platoon 2082 that was all thrown all away. Since my separation from the Marine Corps I have obtained a job and I have put all the knowledge and discipline that I...