Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00771
Original file (MD03-00771.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PFC, USMC
Docket No. MD03-00771

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030326. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040224. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

 1. “I have considered sending this information in order to upgrade my former military status on a number of occasions. I feel that there is no more an appropriate time than now, given our country’s current situation. I beg of you to please take the time to read this letter and my application; and take what I have to say into consideration. I don’t wish to be upgraded to Honorable conditions just to buy a home, or to go to school, or to get benefits of any kind. I do not deny that these would all be welcomed, but these are not my intentions.

I don’t want to go into some sob story of how hard my life was, and how I was deprived and only need to be given a chance. I only mean to say that I truly am from modest means. There are not many things in my life that I can be proud of. Next to having a baby girl on 20000410, the Marine Corps is the only thing that I have. I still hold the Marine Corps in the highest regard. Joining the United States Marine Corps is the best decision I have ever made, and I am a better man having done so. Even if an upgrade is not possible, I would not trade the experience for all the world. I still try to carry myself in a manner that is becoming a Marine. I wasn’t young when I first went into active duty, but my mind was. Today I am a different person. I have different priorities and values, and I owe this to the United States Marine Corps. I had a drug pop almost directly out of boot camp that cost me everything, including my career as an active duty Marine. I spent the rest of my time in the Marine Corps trying to fight a discharge in order to be able to remain in active duty. I went on boards and had many people speak on my behalf, but to no avail. I was however, released with General/Under Honorable Conditions.

Right now our country is going through some trying times. I wish to be upgraded to Honorable conditions so that I may re-enlist and join the rest of my fellow Devil Dogs in our fight for freedom. I say “our fight” because it truly is “ours”. It is our fight for the right to live in a free America. I want to fight for myself, my family, my daughter’s future, my fellow Americans and for your right to live in a free country as well. I am willing to do whatever it takes to make this possible. I will do boot camp over again.

I will come back into active duty as a Private, or even as a Recruit if necessary. I do not do drugs. I am a strong, healthy, 32 year old former Marine who wishes to serve his country. I do realize that this means that I could die, but death is the only thing that we are guaranteed in life anyway. I don’t want to be here just sitting on the sidelines when I am a trained, able bodied American that is willing to go and give my life for the rights of others. In short, I am asking you for the right to have something that I can be proud of again, and I am willing to give my life for it. I say this to you with Honor, with Courage and with true Commitment.

Sincerely,

M_ A_ (Applicant) (social security number deleted)”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Letter of recommendation, dated November 19, 1998
Certificate of commendation, dated November 19, 1998
Certificate of good standing from Marine Wing Support Group 37 for November 11, 1997 to November 18, 1998
Meritorious mast for May 7, 1998 to June 10, 1998
Volunteer appreciation award, dated May 27, 1998

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                970331 - 970420  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 970421               Date of Discharge: 981119

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 06 29
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 26                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 50

 Highest Rank: PFC

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.5 (3)                       Conduct: 4.2 (3)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Letter of Appreciation, MM, Certificate of Commendation

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

970326:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
971218:  NAVDRUGLAB, San Diego, CA, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 971205, tested positive for amphetamine/methamphetamine.

980108:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Illegal drug involvement; specifically drug usage (amphetamine and methamphetamine). Urine sample collected on 9711201 identified at Naval Drug Lab San Diego, CA.] Discharge warning issued.
980114:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A:
 Specification: Wrongful use of a controlled substance on 971201.
Awarded forfeiture of $463.00 per month for 1 month, extra duties for 30 days, reduction to Pvt. Reduction and extra duty for 15 days suspended for 6 months. Not appealed.
980128:  Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the Applicant does not meet the criteria for drug abuse or drug dependence.

980217:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for retention as a result of misconduct due to drug abuse. Notified that discharge may be under other than honorable conditions.
980217:  Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.
980415:  Commanding Officer recommended retention as a result of mandatory processing for administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was your positive testing for methamphetamine and amphetamine.

980730:  CO, MWSG 37 recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was your positive testing for methamphetamine and amphetamine. Commanding Officer’s comments (verbatim): PFC A_’s (Applicant’s) DD Form 1996/2 indicates that he entered the Marine Corps on a drug waiver. Although A_ (Applicant) is a hard worker, I cannot endorse his retention in the Marine Corps. He was already provided a second chance when he enlisted in our Corps.

 981014:  An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge general (under honorable conditions).

981105:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

981116:  GCMCA [3d Marine Aircraft Wing] directed the Applicant's discharge general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19981119 under honorable conditions (general) for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issue 1. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.
The NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Naval Service or any other branch of the Armed Forces. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter.

The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 31 Jan 97 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00965

    Original file (MD03-00965.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00965 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030508. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle, are examples of verifiable documentation that may be...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01099

    Original file (MD04-01099.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-01099 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040616. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the narrative reason for separation changed to “preexisting medical condition.” The Applicant requests a documentary record review. With all of this I leave with you medical and other documents stating the facts of my situation.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01284

    Original file (MD03-01284.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-01284 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030723. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to entry level separation or uncharacterized. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Letter of recommendation from Cdr.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501315

    Original file (MD0501315.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Discharged to command.2. th Marines, recommended Applicant’s discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of illegal drug use, specifically amphetamine and methamphetamine.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501304

    Original file (ND0501304.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requested that his characterization of service be changed to honorable. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00747

    Original file (MD01-00747.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.970703: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Violation of BO1700.6H by underage consumption of alcoholic beverages.Awarded forfeiture of $200.00 per month for 2 months (forfeiture of $100.00 per month for 1 month (suspended for 6 months), 20 days restriction to the limits of Sscol, MCSSS, MCB CamLej without suspension from duty (10 days restriction suspended for 6 months). th...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00057

    Original file (ND02-00057.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    To: Navy Discharge Review Board, I am honorably requesting an upgrade in my discharge status. 950328: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and by a vote of 2 to 1, recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions. Despite the applicant’s excellent performance evaluations, her drug abuse warranted processing...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00711

    Original file (MD02-00711.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I HAVE NEVER DONE DRUGS BEFORE. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 010222 - 010319 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 010320 Date of Discharge: 011010 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 00 06 21 Inactive: None At...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00695

    Original file (MD00-00695.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NDSM Days of Unauthorized Absence: 12 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS /Misconduct-Drug abuse (with administrative discharge board), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 890803: Vacate suspended reduction to PFC awarded at CO's NJP dated 890725.890804: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (2 specs): PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01108

    Original file (ND03-01108.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. I made a few West-Pac tours on the Okinawa and made two trips to the Persian Gulf on mine sweeping operations. 980511: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended...