Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00671
Original file (MD03-00671.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-Pvt, USMCR
Docket No. MD03-00671

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030304. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a personal appearance hearing before the Board in the Washington National Capital Region. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A personal appearance discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040421. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Failure to Participate (Reserve not on active duty) (administrative discharge board required but waived), authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6213.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“Issue # 1. I am seeking a change in my discharge (refer to section 3) based upon a change in character and meritorious post-service conduct.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Letter from Applicant, dated February 10, 2003
Work evaluations (15 pages)
Character reference from Director, Manchester Church of the Nazarene, dated February 2, 2003
Character reference, dated February 14, 2003
Character reference, dated June 19, 1998
Character reference, dated March 18, 1997
Character reference, dated February 27, 1997
Character reference, dated March 1, 1994
Character reference, dated April 26, 1993
Character reference, dated February 3, 2000
Character reference, dated June 11, 1998
Voting registration, dated November 16, 1998
State/Local police report confirming crime-free behavior, dated February 14, 2003
Excerpt from Information pertaining to a review based upon post-service
Character reference, dated April 5, 2004

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 900329               Date of Discharge: 930420

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 06 17
         Inactive: 02 06 06

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 6

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 40

 Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 3.1 (6)                       Conduct: 3.1 (6)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, MUC

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Failure to Participate (Reserve not on active duty) (administrative discharge board required but waived); authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6213.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

900312:  Enlistment contract into the USMCR documents acknowledgement of the requirement to participate in 48 scheduled drills and not less than 14 days of annual training per year for 6 years upon completion of initial active duty training.

900917:  Applicant reported for initial tour of active duty for training.

910404:  Applicant released from initial tour of active duty for training with an Honorable by reason of completion of required active service (USMCR) IADT.

921206:  Letter of intent to administratively separate under other than honorable conditions for the failure to participate in reserve training delivered this date.

921206:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

930125:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve. The factual basis for this recommendation was unauthorized absence from 9 scheduled drills. During this period of time with the unit his performance has been mediocre. Due to Applicant’s numerous absences and our inability to contact him, he is hurting the unit readiness and has no potential for mobilization.

930402:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

930407:  GCMCA [Commanding General, Marine Reserve Force] directed the Applicant's discharge under conditions other than honorable by reason of misconduct due to unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve.

960319:  NDRB documentary record review Docket Number MD96-00482 conducted. Determination: discharge proper and equitable; relief not warranted.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19930420 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve (A, B, and C). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (D). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (E and F).

Issue 1. The Board commends the Applicant for his candor regarding the circumstances surrounding his administrative separation and for the positive contributions he has made to his community since discharge. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity occurred during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. The NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, but only to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Despite the Applicant’s accomplishments since his discharge, the evidence of post-service conduct was found not to mitigate the offense for which he was discharged. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he can also apply to the Board for Correction of Naval Records, 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for a review of his case.



















 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6213 of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16D, effective 890627 until 950817) states that a Marine may be separated for unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve under criteria established in MCO P10014.1.

B. Marine Corps Reserve Administrative Management Manual, MCO P10014.1.

C. Table 6-1, Guide for Characterization of Service, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16D, effective 890627 until 950817).

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

F. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01056

    Original file (MD03-01056.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Letter from Applicant Letter of recommendation from R_ M. T_ Letter of recommendation from R_ M. M_, JD Letter of recommendation from S_ D_ Discharge letter from CO, MAG 46 Letter of recommendation from D_ K_ Everest College...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01123

    Original file (MD99-01123.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. 931115: Letter of intent to administratively separate under other than honorable conditions for the failure to participate in reserve training was sent via certified mail, return receipt requested. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00677

    Original file (MD00-00677.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, the applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. (Equity Issue) As the documentary evidence of record supports, this former member opines that his post-service conduct has been sufficiently creditable to warrant the Board's clemency relief as authorized under provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 9.3. th Marine Division,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00644

    Original file (MD02-00644.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issues, as submitted Prior to the documentary discharge review, the Applicant introduced no issues as block 8 on the DD Form 293 is blank. 920210: Commanding officer notified the Applicant of unsatisfactory drill participation via certified letter. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (E and F).The Applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01143

    Original file (MD01-01143.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Failure to Participate (Reserve not on active duty) (administrative discharge board required but waived), authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6213. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (E and F).Issue 1. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00806

    Original file (MD03-00806.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) does not travel; all hearings are held in the Washington, D.C. area. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Applicant’s DD Form 215...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00640

    Original file (MD03-00640.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/ under honorable conditions. Documentation Only the Applicant’s service and medical records were reviewed, as the Applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board to consider. 940909: Letter of intent to administratively separate under other than honorable conditions for the failure to participate in reserve training was sent via certified mail, return receipt requested.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00638

    Original file (MD02-00638.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Failure to Participate (Reserve not on active duty) (administrative discharge board required but waived), authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6213. AFTER RECEIVING AN HONORABLE DISCHARGE ON 881228 FROM ACTIVE DUTY MARINE CORPS FOR WHICH I RECIEVED A GOOD CONDUCT RIBBON, I DECIDED TO GO INTO THE RESERVES. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-01075

    Original file (MD00-01075.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    941115: Letter of intent to administratively separate under other than honorable conditions for the failure to participate in reserve training was sent via certified mail, return receipt requested. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (E and F).In response to applicant’s issues 1 and 2, the Board found that the applicant’s platoon sergeant attempted to mail the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00397

    Original file (MD00-00397.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00397 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000208, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. (EQUITY ISSUE) As the documentary evidence of record supports, this former member opines that his post service conduct has been sufficiently creditable to warrant the Board's clemency relief as authorized under provision of SECNAVISNT 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 9.3. 910123: Letter of...