Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00018
Original file (MD03-00018.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-LCpl, USMC
Docket No. MD03-00018

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 20020924, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293. Subsequent to the application, the Applicant obtained representation from the American Legion.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20030926. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as submitted

1. (Equity Issue) This former member opines that his overall service record warrants separation with a characterization of his service under honorable conditions.
2. (Equity Issue) This former member further requests that the Board include provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of this application.
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Four pages from Applicant’s service record
Applicant’s DD Form 214
Letter from Applicant, dated March 10, 2003
Letter from Applicant, dated March 22, 2003

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                940623 - 951127  COG
         Active: USMC              951128 - 991012  HON

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 991013               Date of Discharge: 020327

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 05 15
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 22                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 90

 Highest Rank: Sgt

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages : The enlisted performance reports were available to the Board for review through 20010727.

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: GCM (2), JSCM, AFOUA, NDSM, Letter of Appreciation

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

991013:  Applicant reenlisted for 4 years.

 011113:  Applicant admitted to Wilford Hall Medical Center after a suicide gesture at 2300, 011112. Applicant was given a blood test and the result was a positive test for cocaine.
011116:  Inpatient Psychiatry Service evaluation: Diagnoses: Axis I: Mood disorder. Axis II: Deferred. Axis III: Chronic back pain, positive urine drug screen for cocaine. The development of suicidal ideation leading to a suicide attempt as a way of coping with stress has led to Applicant being unable to perform duties. The suicidal behavior was manifested by overdose of medications, and required psychiatric hospitalization for stabilization.
020113:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with lowest characterization possible as under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
020122:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Illegal drug involvement, (cocaine usage identified though urinalysis confirmed by Wilford Medical Laboratory Drug Lab 011113).] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
020122:  Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

020122:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was wrongful use of controlled substance, to wit: cocaine.

020311:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

020314:  GCMCA [Commander, Marine Corps Base, Quantico, VA] directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20020327 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issue 1. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Despite the positive aspects of the Applicant’s service, drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. The record is devoid of evidence that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. The NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Naval Service or any other branch of the Armed Forces. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter. Relief denied.
Issue 2. The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country for the period of enlistment under review. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle, are examples of verifiable documentation that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The Applicant’s evidence of post-service conduct was found not to mitigate the offense for which he was discharged. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 31 Jan 97 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600339

    Original file (MD0600339.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant acknowledged understanding of right to 3 days between notification and administrative discharge board, waived this right and wished to proceed with the administrative board at the proposed time.991216: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, minor disciplinary infractions, and personality disorder, that such misconduct warranted...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01175

    Original file (ND01-01175.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 and duplicate Admin Discharge Package (12 pages) and duplicate Copies of Medical Record (8 pages) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 951214 - 960129 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 960130 Date of Discharge: 960812 Length of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00889

    Original file (MD04-00889.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Mandatory processing for separation is required for Marines who abuse illegal drugs. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation for the Board to consider.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00603

    Original file (ND03-00603.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    971027: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19971027 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). In the absence of a discharge package, the Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B) and, after a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00255

    Original file (MD01-00255.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Mbr admitted that one of the routine activities they do in their get-togethers is to use marijuana. Pt does not want admission to hospital nor think it is indicated as pt does not appear to be an eminent treat to self or others. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was neither proper nor equitable (D and E).In reviewing the record, the Board noted both the applicant’s enlistment waiver...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00119

    Original file (ND03-00119.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Character reference, dated December 13, 2001 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19960209 – 19960611 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 19960612 Date of Discharge: 20011222 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 05 06...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00188

    Original file (ND02-00188.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).Issue 1: The Applicant asserts he deserves to have a decent job and his service warrants an upgrade to his discharge. When the service of a member of U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. The Applicant can provide additional documentation to support any...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00150

    Original file (ND02-00150.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 981204 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Relief not...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01040

    Original file (MD01-01040.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-01040 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010807, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Necessary corrective actions explained and sources of assistance provided.000622: Summary Court Martial Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a. This was only the second time in his life he has ever smoked marijuana.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01350

    Original file (ND03-01350.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to medical reason. The psychiatrist recommended separation based on a personality disorder of such severity as to render the Applicant incapable of serving adequately in the naval service. The summary of service clearly documents that personality disorder, was the reason the applicant was discharged.