Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01246
Original file (ND02-01246.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-DKSN, USN
Docket No. ND02-01246

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020906, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 030612. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as submitted

1. I feel that I was, and can still be, an asset to the Navy. I don't think that I was given the chance to prove my Innocence.

My request for a Special Court Martial was denied. See attached documents.

 2. To whom it may concern,

My name is O-- S. A---. I am requesting an upgrade of my discharge from the Navy. I do realize that my discharge was based on a drug related case, but I was never given the chance to prove my innocence. Attached is paperwork showing that I was in fact an asset to the Navy. I do admit that I made a bad choice by being around people while they were smoking marijuana, but like I've said from the beginning, I do not do drugs. I wanted to go to Court Martial to defend myself, but was never given the opportunity. Before my situation happened, I never knew that a request for Court Martial could be denied. I feel that my right to a fair trial was taken from me. All I am asking is to get my discharge upgraded so that I may be a respected part of my community, and maybe join the Naval reserves. I do appreciate your consideration.

Respectfully,
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Handwritten letter to Congress of the United States, House of Representatives, from Applicant, dated May 17, 2002
Applicant's DD Form 214
Nineteen pages from Applicant's service record

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     981221 - 990105  COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 990106               Date of Discharge: 010615

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 05 10
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 20                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 10 GED           AFQT: 64

 Highest Rate: DK3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.00 (2)    Behavior: 2.00 (2)                OTA: 2.92

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NATO, KCM, NUC, NEM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

001214:  NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 001130, tested positive for THC.

010313:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
010501:  Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to submit statements. Applicant originally elected an administrative discharge board on 010315.
010509:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

010529:  Commander, Navy Region, Mid-Atlantic directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 010615 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issues 1 and 2. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Despite the favorable references from members of his chain of command, drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. The decision whether to refer a case to a court-martial or to impose non-judicial punishment is within the discretion of an individual’s commanding officer. Administrative separation regulations allow for the separation of an individual for an offense that constitutes a violation of the UCMJ without a finding of guilty at either a court-martial or non-judicial hearing. Accordingly, the fact that applicant’s commanding officer did not take disciplinary action prior to initiating administrative separation proceedings does not constitute an inequity or impropriety. Relief denied.
The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 31, dated 20 Feb 01, effective 12 Feb 2001 until 15 Jul 2001, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00083

    Original file (ND04-00083.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was considered by the NDRB. 010615: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00249

    Original file (ND01-00249.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Sixty-eight pages from applicant's service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN 920826 - 960806 HON Inactive: USNR (DEP) 920821 - 920825 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 960807 Date of Discharge: 980410 Length of Service (years, months,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01375

    Original file (ND03-01375.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-01375 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030813. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. Issue 1: Mandatory processing for separation is required for sailors who abuse illegal drugs.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00414

    Original file (ND03-00414.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00414 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030116. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions and the re-entry code be changed from RE-4 to RE-3. I was discharged with an other than honorable discharge, the reason for that was that I tested positive for drugs.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00213

    Original file (ND01-00213.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Two pages from applicant's service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 971125 - 980126 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 980127 Date of Discharge: 981119 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 00 09 24 Inactive: None The applicant...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00210

    Original file (ND01-00210.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00210 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001211, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to Honorable. The Board determined, by the applicant’s own admission, he did not follow existing Navy directives, when going to Mexico. The applicant states he realizes he should have reported his friend for using steroids.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01386

    Original file (ND03-01386.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-PR3, USN Docket No. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. At this time, the Board determined that the documentation submitted by the Applicant does not mitigate his misconduct while on active duty.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01138

    Original file (ND03-01138.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-01138 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030618. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Navy is where I want to be.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00934

    Original file (ND04-00934.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20041103. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).Issues 1-3: The Applicant states his discharge was based on one isolated incident in “46 months.” Despite a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00734

    Original file (ND03-00734.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Non-judicial punishment Notification and Election of Rights (2 pages) Distinguished Military Graduate Certificate date November 7, 2000 Certificate of Completion (U.S. Verifiable proof of any...