Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01053
Original file (ND02-01053.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-FA, USNR
Docket No. ND02-01053

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020718, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requested a personal appearance hearing before the board in the Washington National Capital Region. The Applicant listed the American Legion as the representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter to the Applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 030501. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as submitted

1. (Propriety Issue) This former member avers that he was not afforded all of his due process rights before he was discharged. Specifically, he was deprived of his rights to confer with counsel and to an Administrative Discharge Board. On this basis, he opines that recharacterization of his service period to General (Under Honorable Conditions) is warranted.

2. (Equity Issue) This former member further requests that the Board include provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of this application.
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant' s DD Form 214
Fifty-one pages from Applicant's service record

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: None
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 930730               Date of Discharge: 941215

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 03 29
         Inactive: 00 00 16

 Age at Entry: 26                          Years Contracted: 8

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 51

 Highest Rate: FN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 2.60 (1)    Behavior: 2.60 (1)                OTA: 2.80

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: SSDR, NER, NDSM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 4

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

930817:  Applicant to active duty.

940117:  Applicant to unauthorized absence 0700, 940117.

 940119:  Applicant from unauthorized absence 0700, 940119 (2 days/surrendered).
940430:  Applicant reported onboard USS BAINBRIDGE at 1957 940430.

 940506:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 0700, 940416 to 0800, 940418 (2 days/surrendered), violation of UCMJ, Article 87: Missing vessels movement on 0830, 940416, violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Failure to obey a order or regulation on 940427, to wit: to meet Executive Officer at 0800, 940427 to catch a flight to US BAINBRIDGE.
         Award: Forfeiture of $416 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
940506:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Unauthorized absence, missing vessel's movement, failure to obey a lawful order or regulation and alcohol related incident.), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.
        
940714:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (2 specs): (1) Absence without leave on 2145, 940703 to 0300, 940704, (2) Absence without leave on 1530-1830, 940704, violation of UCMJ, Article 90: Willfully disobeying superior commissioned officer on 2100, 940703, to wit: to be escorted by BM2, violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Failure to obey order or regulation on 940703, to wit: to sign out in the liberty log.
         Award: Restriction and extra duty for 45 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
940716:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense as evidenced by the punishment under the UCMJ in your current enlistment.
940718:  Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation and to make a statement.
940730:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense. Commanding Officer’s comments (verbatim): [Since enlisting, FR W_ (Applicant) has been a burden to the Navy. He has demonstrated a total disregard for the Navy’s rules and regulations and to senior and junior service members alike. This has been evidenced by his two nonjudicial punishment in his current enlistment. Based on his unwillingness to conform and abide to Navy rules and regulations, and his immediate chain-of-command, this command has indulged FR W_ (Applicant) the utmost concern and diligence to correct his personal and military behavior, and conduct. Through many individual administrative counseling and warnings, FR W_ (Applicant) refuses to site the recommendations and deficiencies of his unbecoming behavior, for which subsequently FR W_ (Applicant) has no immediate intentions of complying. I strongly recommend that you separate FR W_ (Applicant) from the naval service with an other than honorable discharge.]
940812:  BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

941019:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A: Wrongfully use marijuana on 940915.
         Award: Forfeiture of $416 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days. No indication of appeal in the record.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 941215 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1: Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. The Board disagrees with the Applicant’s claim that he was not afforded all of his due process rights. The record clearly demonstrates the Applicant consulted with legal counsel and waived his right to an administrative board. The record is void of any evidence to support a claim of impropriety. His service record is marred by award of non-judicial punishment (NJP) on three separate occasions for various offenses some of which are triable by court-martial. Commission of a serious offense and illegal drug use warrants processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. An upgrade to general (under honorable) conditions would be inappropriate. Relief denied. It must be noted that most Sailors serve honorably and well and therefore earn honorable discharges. In fairness to those Sailors, commanders and separation authorities are tasked to ensure that undeserving Sailors receive no higher characterization than is due.

Issue 2: There is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and credible evidence that the Applicant is living a drug free life style, are examples of verifiable documents that should be provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. At this time, the Applicant has not provided any verifiable documentation of good character and conduct to mitigate his misconduct while on active duty. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9, effective
22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01159

    Original file (ND03-01159.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01051

    Original file (ND02-01051.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the Applicant, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities, and credible evidence that the Applicant is living a drug free lifestyle, are examples of verifiable documents that should be...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01110

    Original file (ND02-01110.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-01110 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020807, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :940414: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 Unauthorized absence from 0530, 931224 until 0600, 940104 (10 days/surrendered) Award: Forfeiture of $466 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to EMFR. No indication of appeal in the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00732

    Original file (ND04-00732.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.940816: NAVDRUGLAB, San Diego, CA, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 940810, tested positive for amphetamine/methamphetamine.940819: Medical Evaluation: Applicant not drug dependent, recommend Level II CAAC treatment if retained in the service.940822: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A (2 specs): (1) Wrongfully possess an amount of amphetamine/methamphetamine on 940808, (2) Wrongfully use amphetamines/methamphetamines. 941005: An...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00414

    Original file (ND02-00414.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00414 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020221, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Award: Forfeiture of $416 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to SR. No indication of appeal in the record.940603: USS AMERICA (CV 66) notified Applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00382

    Original file (ND99-00382.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    950216: BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure with a characterization of service as type warranted by service record. Determination: discharge proper and equitable; relief not warranted. The applicant had two retention warnings for alcohol related incidents after completion of Level II alcohol treatment.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00925

    Original file (ND99-00925.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :940425: Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Alcohol abuse, 2Apr94, 1-3 times per month, ashore off duty, self-referral/disclosure. Commanding officer recommended separate not via VA hospital.940823: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00421

    Original file (ND00-00421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION No indication of appeal in the record.940502: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by all drug incidents in your current enlistment and the commission of a serious offenses as evidenced by your violation of the UCMJ, Article 92 by drinking alcoholic beverages while under the age of 21 and violation of the UCMJ, Article 111 drunk...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00399

    Original file (MD99-00399.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :920213: Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.930622: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: disobey a lawful written order, to wit: MARCORPBASEJAPANO 10120.1A, by driving a POV without a driver's license.Awarded forfeiture of $400.00 per month for 1 month. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00571

    Original file (MD02-00571.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Documentation In addition to the record of trial (the Naval Discharge Review Board was unable to get the service record), the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Service Related Documents (16) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC None Inactive: USMCR(J) 920110 - 920324 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of...