Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01041
Original file (ND02-01041.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-AR, USNR
Docket No. ND02-01041

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020718, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a personal appearance hearing discharge review before a traveling panel closest to Vallejo, CA. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter to the Applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) does not travel, all hearings are held in the Washington, DC Area. The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the Board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 030414. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as submitted

1. I am remorseful regarding my arrest for possession of marijuana. I have included a statement which described what happened. I was immature and believe I have gained some personal growth since my discharge.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Copies of DD Form 214 (2)
Navy Drug Lab Report, dated April 28, 1998
Commanding Officer Recommendation for Separation, dated May 5, 1998
Letter of Notification, dated May 4, 1998
Letter from Applicant, dated May 7, 2002 (2 pages)
Employment History (2 pages)
Employment Evaluation, dated February 19, 2002
Reference Letter from A_ C_, Landlord/Father in Law, dated March 13, 2002
Employment Reference Letters from B_ C_, dated February 19, 2002 (2 letters)
Character Reference Letter from D_ C_, dated April 30, 2002
Letter of Recommendation from B_ K_, Supervisor Airport Services, America West Airlines, dated April 7, 2002.
Marriage Certificate, dated October 15, 1997
Transcript from NAPA VALLEY College, dated March 3, 2002
Transcript from College of Contra Costa, dated March 7, 2002
Letter from D_ S_, Veterans Service Representative, dated May 24, 2002

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: None
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 970131               Date of Discharge: 980511

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 10 19
         Inactive: 00 04 22

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 3

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 47

 Highest Rate: AA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NMF                  Behavior: NMF             OTA: NMF

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: M-16A1 Sharpshooter Ribbon

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

970623:  Commenced 36 months of active duty under the AN Apprenticeship training program.

980428:  NAVDRUGLAB (JACKSONVILLE FL) reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 980422, tested positive for [THC].
980504:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A: Wrongfully use marijuana from 980412 to 980428.
         Award: Forfeiture of $463.00 pay per month for 2 months (suspended for 6 months), restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-1. No indication of appeal in the record.
980504:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by all punishments under the UCMJ in current enlistment.
980504:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
980505:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). Commanding Officer’s comments (verbatim): [Airman Recruit G_’s (Applicant’s) misconduct warrants separation. He has no potential for further military service. He has total disregard for all Navy rules and regulations. I strongly recommend Airman Recruit G_ (Applicant) be separated immediately from the Naval Service under Other Than Honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.]

980507:  Commander, Amphibious Group TWO directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 980511 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1: Although the Applicant claims he was immature and his drug use was an isolated incident, drug abuse (use) warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. The record is devoid of evidence that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a consideration of the propriety and equity of a discharge. A characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions is warranted when the service member’s conduct constitutes a significant departure from that expected of a sailor. T he Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of service, reflects his disobedience of the orders and directives that regulate good order and discipline in the naval service, and falls far short of that required for an honorable characterization of service. An upgrade to under honorable conditions would be inappropriate. Additionally, t he NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the naval service or any other branch of the Armed forces. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter. Relief denied.

T here is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities, and credible evidence that the Applicant is living a drug free lifestyle, are examples of verifiable documents that should be provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. After a complete review of the record, including the evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board determined that the Applicant’s discharge was proper and equitable and that his evidence of post service accomplishments was found not to mitigate the misconduct for which he was discharged. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective 12 Dec 97 to 19 May 99, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00542

    Original file (ND04-00542.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-PRAA, USN Docket No. 981102: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, misconduct due to civilian conviction and drug abuse rehabilitation failure.981102: Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00414

    Original file (ND03-00414.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00414 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030116. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions and the re-entry code be changed from RE-4 to RE-3. I was discharged with an other than honorable discharge, the reason for that was that I tested positive for drugs.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00797

    Original file (ND01-00797.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Letter from A___ M. M___ (Lee County Veterans Affairs Officer) Reference Letters (3) Copies of DD Form 214 (2) Copy of Police Record Check Letter PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 951221 - 960625 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 960626 Date of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00835

    Original file (ND00-00835.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    990715: Applicant made following statement on the Military Suspect's Acknowledgement and Waiver of Rights: "I FR C_ did not use cocaine. No indication of appeal in the record.990728: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.990728: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00418

    Original file (ND03-00418.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. On 13 Oct 98, PR3 S_ (Applicant) went to NJP for two specifications of Article 86 and two specifications of Article 112a. The Board found no indication in the record that the Applicant was inequitably or improperly denied treatment for his drug use.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00692

    Original file (ND00-00692.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In response to the applicant’s issues 1 and 5, the Board found the applicant implies that a permissive doctrine exists whereby one in the military is allowed a “single misdeed”. In response to the applicant’s issues 3 and 4, the applicant’s misconduct outweighs the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01321

    Original file (ND02-01321.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Character reference, dated August 9, 2002 Character reference, dated August 7, 2002 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 940921 - 950717 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 950718 Date of Discharge: 970713 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00454

    Original file (ND04-00454.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Mandatory processing for separation is required for sailors who abuse illegal drugs. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00276

    Original file (ND04-00276.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Thank you R_ M_ (Applicant) Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’ s DD Form 214 from Air National Guard, LAMedical page, dated May 5, 2003 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 000923 -...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00605

    Original file (ND03-00605.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00605 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030303. We refer this case to the Board for their careful and compassionate consideration and request the Applicant’s discharge be reviewed for upgrading his general discharge to honorable discharge.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Employment/Character Reference Letter dated February...