Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00526
Original file (ND02-00526.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-ATAR, USN
Docket No. ND02-00526

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020320, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 021121. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues, as submitted
1. Discharge Review

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Personal account of USN Disciplinary Action (7 pages)
Letter to Cdr from Applicant's mother dated April 25, 2001 with attachments
 Letter to congresswoman dated June 29, 2001 with attachments
 Copy of consent to release of personal record information dated November 7, 2001
 Letter from Member of Congress dated July 2, 2001
 Letter to Member of Congress dated July 12, 2001
Letter from Member of Congress dated August 14, 2001
 Letter to Member of Congress dated August 3, 2001
Letter to Member of Congress dated July 24, 2001
Letter from Member of Congress dated July 30, 2001
Letter to Member of Congress dated July 24, 2001
Letter to Applicant dated September 6, 2001
Letter to Applicant dated September 18, 2001
Memorandum from Applicant to Defense Finance and Accounting Service dated October 3, 2001
Letter to Applicant dated October 1, 2001
Two pages of fax
Nineteen pages printed from the internet
Copy of consent to release of personal record information dated June 9, 2001
Letter from Member of Congress dated September 13, 2001
Letter to Member of Congress dated November 1, 2001
 Seventy-one pages from Applicant's service record (throughout the supporting documents)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     000331 - 000410  COG
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 000411               Date of Discharge: 010525

 Length of Service (years, months, days):
         Active: 01 01 15
          Inactive: None
Age at Entry: 22                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 54
Highest Rate: ATAA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
Performance: NMF*                 Behavior: NMF             OTA: NMF
Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None
Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 *No Marks Found in the service record.
Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly 3630620.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

010411:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use, possession, etc. of a controlled substance.
         Award: Forfeiture of $521 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to ATAR. Appealed 010502. Appeal denied 010517.
010430:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense.
010430:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
010503:  Medical evaluation for alcohol/drug abuse found the Applicant to be ETOH dependent.

010504:  Applicant declined treatment.
010523:  Commanding Officer, Strike Fighter Squadron 124 recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to drug abuse (use).
010524:  Commanding Officer, Naval Air Station, Lemoore directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 010525 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).
Issue 1. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. The Applicant failed to provide sufficient documentation to refute the presumption of regularity concerning his use of illegal drugs and subsequent processing for administrative separation. That the Applicant may know other sailors who were separated under similar conditions but received a higher characterization of service does not mitigate his misconduct or warrant an upgrade to his characterization of service. Relief denied.
The Board’s charter limits its review to a determination on the propriety and equity of the discharge. This review does not include consideration for reinstatement of monies, clearances, rank, leave, or benefits determined by the Veterans Administration. The Board found no mistakes on the Applicant’s DD-214. Concerning a change in reenlistment code, the NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Naval Service or any other branch of the Armed Forces. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter. Relief is therefore denied.
The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.



Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 31, dated 20 Feb 01, effective 12 Feb 2001 until 15 Jul 2001, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.
D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

 The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00320

    Original file (ND02-00320.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00320 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020128, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, the applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record, documentation of community service,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00582

    Original file (ND04-00582.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. I ask that you as a Review Board consider my service record and the supporting documentation that I have enclosed with this letter in your review. There is no law or regulation that provides recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits, or enhancing employment and educational opportunities and this issue does not serve to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00449

    Original file (ND03-00449.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20020424 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01199

    Original file (ND02-01199.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-AR, USN Docket No. 990809: Commanding Officer, Naval Air Station, Lemoore directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).990813: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146. PART III – RATIONALE FOR...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00195

    Original file (ND03-00195.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was considered by the NDRB. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider. Therefore, no relief will be granted.The applicant is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01086

    Original file (ND01-01086.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020328. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 000901 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01191

    Original file (ND02-01191.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-01191 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020821, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. No indication of appeal in the record.010502: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse based on written statement of possession dated 010402.010502: Applicant advised of his rights and having...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01075

    Original file (ND02-01075.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-01075 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020729, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to entry level separation or uncharacterized and the reason for the discharge be changed to “Please change re-entry code to a #2.” The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 980312 under other than honorable...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00073

    Original file (ND03-00073.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 000731 Date of Discharge: 010731 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 00 01 Inactive: None At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00156

    Original file (ND02-00156.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020731. Documentation Only the service and medical records were reviewed, as the applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board to consider. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 010319 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A).