Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00431
Original file (ND02-00431.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-AQAR, USN
Docket No. ND02-00431

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020226, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to "discharge based on mental illness invalid for navy to discharge." The Applicant requested a personal appearance hearing discharge review before a traveling panel closest to Los Angeles. CA. The Applicant listed LA County Veterans Affairs as the representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter to the Applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) does not travel, all hearings are held in the Washington, DC Area. Applicant subsequently advised the Board that he would be unable to travel to Washington, D.C., for a personal appearance hearing; therefore, the case was converted to a documentary review.

 Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 021029. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: BAD CONDUCT/Convicted by special court martial, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3640420.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as submitted

1. I am requesting that my discharge be changed to Honorable. I was discharged with a Special Court Martial because the navy said I was mentally ill. I understand that the navy cannot use mental illness as a way to discharge me from service. I was not given appropriate medical assistance for my conditions which was suicidal at time of service and discharge. During prior service, I was of sound mind. I understand that medical care was guaranteed by navy at time of my mental illness was apparent. No medical assistance for the treatment of my illness was given by the Navy. This illness has taken more than 10 years from my life, if I had the medical care at that time, I feel strongly that my service would not have resulted in BCD discharge and that the discharge also affected my medical condition. The naval doctors who examined me prior to discharge did not recognize my condition. In fact, he said I was fine that there was nothing wrong with me at that time. I had told the doctor that I was suicidal. The doctor did not offer further medical treatment and soon after I was discharged by Special Court Martial.

 Documentation
The Applicant’s medical record was not available to the Board. In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     820727 - 830623  COG
         Active: USN                        None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 830624               Date of Discharge: 870506

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 00 07
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 80

 Highest Rate: AQ3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NOB                  Behavior: NOB             OTA: NOB

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 203

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

BAD CONDUCT/Convicted by special court martial, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3640420.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

840720:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Violation of Article 86, UCMJ), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

840720:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: UA from appointed place of duty, to wit: SNM was UA from 0620 until 0710, 840607.
         Award: Forfeiture of $162.00 pay per month for 1 month, reduction to E-3 (suspended for 6 months). No indication of appeal in the record.

850409:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: UA 850327 and 850403, violation of UCMJ Article 112: Wrongful use of cocaine 851227.
         Award: Forfeiture of $396.00 pay per month for 2 months, 45 days restriction concurrent with 45 days extra duty, reduction to E-3, CAAC Evaluation, Psych Evaluation, 2.8 Special Evaluation, and page 13 entry. No indication of appeal in the record.

850730:  Report of Declaration of Deserter (NAVPERS 1600-3). Applicant declared a deserter on 850728 having been an unauthorized absentee since 0700, 850627 from FITRON 24.

860117   Applicant apprehended by civil authorities.

860118:  Pre-trial confinement: 860118 to 860303.

860121:  Report of Return of Deserter. Applicant apprehended by civil authorities on 860106. Civil charges pending. Returned to military control 860117 (1740) at FITRON 24. Retained onboard for disciplinary action disposition.

860618:  Special Court Martial [trial dates 860210, 860303-860306]
         Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 85: Absent in desertion from 850731 to 860117(170 days/A). Charge II: violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, (2 Specifications).
         Specification 1: Unauthorized absence 850528 – 850624
         Specification 2: Unauthorized absence 850627 – 850730
         Findings: to Charge I and specification 1 thereunder, guilty. To Charge II and specification 1 thereunder, not guilty; specification 2 thereunder charge II, guilty.
         Sentence: CHL for 100 days, forfeiture of $426.00 pay per month for 3 months, reduction to E-1, Bad Conduct discharge.
         CA 860612: Sentence approved and ordered executed except for bad conduct discharge.
        
860722:  NMCCMR: The findings of guilty and sentence, as approved on review, are affirmed.
860925:  COMA: Request for appeal denied.

870421:  SSPCMO: Article 71c, UCMJ, having been complied with, Bad Conduct discharge ordered executed.            

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 870506 with a bad conduct discharge due to conviction by a special court martial (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issue 1: In response to the Applicant’s issue, relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency (C, Part IV). The Applicant’s case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. The NDRB found the Applicant’s service record devoid of any mitigating or extenuating factors sufficient to offset the seriousness of the offenses for which the discharge was awarded. The Applicant did not provide any documentation of post-service accomplishments to warrant relief based upon post-service clemency. The NDRB determined the reason for discharge, convicted by special court martial, is most appropriate. Relief denied.
Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560), Change 1/83, effective
28 Apr 83 until 14 Jun 87, Article 3640420, DISCHARGE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE OF COURTMARTIAL

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard, D.C. 20374-5023   

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00779

    Original file (ND00-00779.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 900709 - 900912 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 900913 Date of Discharge: 920826 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 09 05 Inactive: None ...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00035

    Original file (ND03-00035.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider. The Manual for courts-martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 (unauthorized absence for more than 30 days). The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00970

    Original file (ND04-00970.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19970930 with a bad conduct discharge which was the sentence adjudged by a properly convened special court-martial. The Manual for courts-martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 81, conspiracy; Article...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01196

    Original file (ND99-01196.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. 841214: SSPCMO: Article 71c, UCMJ, having been complied with, Bad Conduct discharge ordered executed. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 850110 with a bad conduct due to convicted by a special court martial (A).

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00189

    Original file (ND03-00189.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant declared a deserter on 880718 having been an unauthorized absentee since 0500, 880618 from USS CLAUDE V. RICKETTS (DDG-5).881021: Special Court Martial [trial date 881021] Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from unit 880618 until 880809, [52 days/S.]. At this time, the Applicant has not provided any verifiable documentation of good character and conduct to mitigate his misconduct while on active duty. The Manual for courts-martial authorizes the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00625

    Original file (ND02-00625.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 850725 - 860706 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 860707 Date of Discharge: 871029 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 00 05 29 [Does not include confinement or Appellate...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00159

    Original file (ND00-00159.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 (2 copies) Twenty-one pages from applicant's service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 820604 Date of Discharge: 860923 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 04 03 20 Inactive: None ),...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00328

    Original file (ND02-00328.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Equity Issue) Pursuant to 10 USC 874 (b) (UCMJ, Article 74) and in accordance with SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 2.24 and 9.3, this former member requests the Board's clemency relief with up-grade of his characterization of service to under honorable conditions on the basis of his post-service conduct. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 900731 with a bad conduct characterization of service due to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01005

    Original file (ND00-01005.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION of Transportation (FAA) Mechanic License issued 2 March 1999 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN 810504 - 851210 HON Inactive: USNR (DEP) 800907 - 810503 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 851211 Date of Discharge: 900309 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 04 02 29 (Doesn't exclude UA and confinement time.) 881013: Special Court Martial.Charge...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00078

    Original file (ND02-00078.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Out of fear for my son being born too early from constant stress and badgering from her mother once I was stationed in school in Pensacola, Fla, my wife moved down and gave birth to my son two days after the move. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN None Inactive: USNR...