Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00352
Original file (ND02-00352.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-FR, USN
Docket No. ND02-00352

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020131, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020912. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was four to one that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct - Pattern of misconduct, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as submitted

 1. I signed up for military service while still in high school and entered active duty soon after graduation from high school. I was young, from a small town with a population of less than five thousand people and had never been away from home or that town for any length of time. I had little if any knowledge in the ways of the world. Because of my youth I was totally unaware of the consequences of the actions I took which caused my discharge and I willfully admit that I regret these actions. Hopefully after thirteen years I can be forgiven for my behavior as a young, unknowledgeable, ill informed, rather immature man child. I am currently bettering myself by seeking degrees at post secondary educational institution. And it is my hope and wish that I will continue to mature and grow in knowledge and wisdom.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Job/Character reference from Plant Manager dated April 16, 1996
Job/character reference from Dulond Tool and Engineering, Inc dated September 26, 1996
Copy of Institutional Transcript from Jackson State Community College (3 pages)
Letter from Assistant Professor, Jackson State Community College dated November 15, 2001
Copy of unofficial undergraduate transcript Jackson State Community College
Copy of DD Form 214 (Member 1)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     860929 - 870625  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 860626               Date of Discharge: 881219

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 05 24
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 85

 Highest Rate: FN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 2.80 (1)    Behavior: 2.80 (2)                OTA: 3.20

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 3

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct - Pattern of misconduct, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

871117:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (3 specs): (1) Unauthorized absence from 0545-0548, 18 Oct 87, (2) Unauthorized absence 0645 to 0710, 11 Nov 87, (3) Unauthorized absence 1315 to 1345, 10 Nov 87.
         Award: Forfeiture of $200 per month for 1 month. No indication of appeal in the record.
880406:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 134 (2 specs): (1) Disorderly conduct on 2 Apr 88, (2) Underage drinking on 2 Apr 88.
         Award: Forfeiture of $100 per month for 1 month, restriction for 30 days, reduction to FA. Reduction suspended for 6 months. No indication of appeal in the record.
880406:  Retention Warning from USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT (CVN 71): Advised of deficiency (Record of minor misconduct due to your disorderly behavior, should it continue, will create an adverse record of minor disciplinary infractions, or worse, form a pattern of misconduct which cannot be tolerated.), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

 881007:  Vacate reduction to FA awarded at CO's NJP dated 6 Apr 86 due to continued misconduct.
881007:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 134: Drunk and disorderly on 29 Sep 88.
         Award: Forfeiture of $335 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to FR. No indication of appeal in the record.
881008:  USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT (CVN-71) notified applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.
881008:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
881009:  Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Alcohol abuse, 4 to 7 times per week, ashore off duty. DAPA and physician found applicant dependent and recommended separate via VA hospital. Commanding Officer recommended separate via VA hospital.

881102:  Dependency screening for Alcohol dependency. Recommended Level III ARC at VA.
881102:  Commanding Officer, USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT (CVN-71) recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

881128:  CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

881205:  Applicant declined outpatient alcohol rehabilitation through the VA.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 881219 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1: The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, will change the reason for discharge if such a change is warranted. The Applicant’s summary of service clearly documents the Applicant’s pattern of misconduct. The Board found that the applicant’s age, education level, and test scores qualified him for enlistment. While he may feel that his immaturity and youth was a factor that contributed to his actions, his official record shows a willful disregard for the requirements of military discipline and demonstrated that he was unfit for further service. The record is devoid of evidence that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate. Relief denied.

Issue 2: Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities, and credible evidence that the Applicant is drug and alcohol free, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. Although the Board was impressed with the Applicant’s continuing educational pursuits, the Applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended, but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A, effective 870615 - 890110), Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – A PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.



PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls10.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00960

    Original file (ND02-00960.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00960 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020624, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 030214. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01189

    Original file (ND03-01189.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00008

    Original file (ND99-00008.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.890306: USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) notified applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure, by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.890306: Applicant advised of his rights and having not consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00992

    Original file (ND02-00992.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00992 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020708, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The discharge shall remain: UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL)/Misconduct - Pattern of Misconduct, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 900226: Retention Warning from USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT (CVN-71): Advised of deficiency (record of minor misconduct due to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00263

    Original file (ND00-00263.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pt instructed to stop drinking.950120: Applicant to unauthorized absence 0700, 20Jan95. At that time the hospital staff did not know that the patient’s command had received discharge authority with a separation date of 29 Apr 95 and had arranged for him to be separated with an Other Than Honorable discharge. Under the Manual for Courts-Martial, a punitive discharge is authorized for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 86, for unauthorized absence for a period in...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00094

    Original file (ND00-00094.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS but the reason should be corrected to say PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-140 (formerly 3630600).The NDRB noted an administrative error on the original DD Form 214. Applicant declared a deserter 98MAR13, having been an unauthorized absentee since 1130 98FEB10, from USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT (CVN 71).980616: Surrendered at Personnel Support Activity, MacDill AFB, Tampa, FL. The names, and votes of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00658

    Original file (ND04-00658.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION A FEW MONTHS HAD GONE BY AND I TOLD FIRST CLASS T_ THAT I DID NOT WANT TO WORK WITH PETTY OFFICER W_. SO I DIDN’T LIKE WHAT HE WAS SAYING TO ME, SO I FINISHED THE JOB AND WENT BACK TO MY DIVISION.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500295

    Original file (ND0500295.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests that his characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of all available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has met the standard of acceptable conduct and performance, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. The NDRB is not...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00484

    Original file (ND02-00484.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. CA action 911030: Sentence approved and ordered executed.911116: Released from confinement and returned to full duty. Applicant declared a deserter on 920207 having been an unauthorized absentee since 0545, 920107 from USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT (CVN-71).920424: Report of Return of Deserter.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500323

    Original file (ND0500323.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered: Applicant’s DD Form 214 Applicant’s resumé (2 pages) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 891013 - 900807 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of...