Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00330
Original file (ND02-00330.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-DKSA, USN
Docket No. ND02-00330

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020129, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 021029. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630650.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as submitted

 1. I'm writing for a request in regards to a discharge upgrade. I'm asking for a discharge upgrade because I feel I'm entitled to it. I realize the choices we make sometimes cause us a great deal, but I do believe I served my country well and considering the actions I took during the particular circumstances still represented the Navy well. I also believe the Navy is branch that has been established by superior service by their seamen and the ability to learn from your mistakes. I also realize that somethings would look to be way out of order from a paper stand point. But I assure you my only desire after my incident was to reenlist in the Navy for a second enlistment. The Navy taught me discipline and the heart to achieve all goals considered unreachable. Well fighting for my discharge upgraded is one of those goals I long to fight for with a sincere heart. Sir, I made a mistake only out of fear and not being able to work in my rate and reenlist in the Navy. When you desire to achieve so much out of life through a branch of government known for its 2 nd chances its important. I've seen the Navy as a organization fight for a 2 nd chance after tailhook and I've seen the Navy make men achieve their dreams that encouraged others to be Navy men in Men of Honor. So I hope/pray my 2 nd chance will be awarded. I just want my educational benefits. I have met the requirements stated in the education G.I. Bill booklet. Thank you.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
None

 A discharge package was not available.

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USN                        None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     890321 - 890522  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 890523               Date of Discharge: 950901

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 08 018
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 44

 Highest Rate: DKSN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 2.93 (6)    Behavior: 2.91 (7)                OTA: 3.90

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, SSDR(w1b*), NAVY"E"RIBBON

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 934

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article formerly 3630650.


 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

921223:  Report of Declaration of Deserter (NAVPERS 1600-3). Applicant declared a deserter on 921209 having been an unauthorized absentee since 0001, 921109 from USS NASSAU.

930301:  Report of Return of Deserter. Applicant apprehended by civil authorities on 930220 (1900) at Meridian, MS. Returned to military control 930226 (1710) at Deserter point PERS-842, Washington, DC. Orig will retain custody of SNM pending transfer to USS NASSAU at Norfolk, VA FORDU.

930601:  Special Court Martial
         Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence 921109 – 930226, [109 days/A].
         Findings: to Charge I and the specifications thereunder, guilty.
         Sentence: CHL for 90 days (suspend 60 days), forfeiture of $300.00 per month for 3 months, reduction to E-2.
         CA 930501: Sentence approved and ordered executed.

940411:  Report of Declaration of Deserter (NAVPERS 1600-3). Applicant declared a deserter on 930519 having been an unauthorized absentee since 0630, 930419 from USS NASSAU.

950726:  Report of Return of Deserter. Applicant apprehended by civil authorities on 950723 (1426) at ROSCO, TX. Returned to military control 950723(1630). Transferred TEMDU to TPU GLAKES IL 1345, 950725.

950808:  Sentence of 30 days confinement suspended at SPCM of 930401 vacated due to continued misconduct.

950901:  Released from confinement and restored to full duty.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 950901 under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

The Board disagrees with the Applicant's contention that he served the United States well and he is entitled to an upgrade. When the service of a member of U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. Under other than honorable conditions is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member's conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member's military record. T he Applicant’s service was marred by two very long-term unauthorized absences totaling 934 days. Both were ended by apprehension. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

 The Applicant is requesting an upgrade to his discharge so he can receive benefits from the Veterans Administration (VA). The VA determines eligibility for post-service benefits not the Navy Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
The following is provided for the benefit of the Applicant. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. There is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Relief denied.




The Applicant is reminded that the period of eligibility for a personal appearance hearing is 15 years from the date of discharge. The application package must be submitted to the NDRB prior to the expiration of the 15 year period. The Applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.



Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9, effective
22 Jul 94 until 2 Oct 96, Article 3630650, PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING ENLISTED PERSONNEL FOR SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURTMARTIAL.

B. A punitive bad conduct discharge may be adjudged for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 86, unauthorized absence for a period more than 30 days, upon conviction by a Special or General Court-Martial, in accordance with the Manual for Courts-Martial.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00826

    Original file (ND02-00826.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00826 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020515, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable, general/under honorable conditions or entry level separation (uncharacterized). In the acknowledgement letter to the Applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. On May 1997, I was discharge from the U.S. Navy...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00310

    Original file (ND00-00310.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Documentation Only the service and medical records were reviewed, as the applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board to consider. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board found that the applicant was discharged in lieu of trial by...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00840

    Original file (ND00-00840.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00840 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000628, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In response to the applicant’s issue, the Board appreciates the fact that the applicant served to the best of his ability while aboard the USS...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00631

    Original file (ND03-00631.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00631 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030225. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01052

    Original file (ND03-01052.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT , ex-MS2, USN Docket No. ND03-01052 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030602. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00058

    Original file (ND04-00058.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    _______________________________________________________________________ In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166, and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue and following statement in supplement to the Applicant’s petition.The service record is incomplete. 951004: Applicant discharged There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00216

    Original file (ND03-00216.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00216 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20021121, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. he Applicant’s service was marred by two non-judicial punishments (NJP) and was declared a deserter on 19930429 and returned to military control by civil authorities on 19940930. The Applicant’s counsel also requests that the Board consider the Applicant’s service in a combat zone.The Board...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01233

    Original file (ND99-01233.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In the applicant’s issues 1 through 4, there is no law or regulation that provides for the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the Service. In the applicant’s issue 5, the Board did not find any enlisted performance mark...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00863

    Original file (ND99-00863.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-SMSN, USN Docket No. ND99-00863 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990611, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Relief to a fully Honorable discharge is, however, not warranted.The applicant’s second issue states: “I have been very involved in the Children’s Ministry at my Church and in Latino Affairs at the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01080

    Original file (ND03-01080.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-01080 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030605. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing, also advised that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) does not travel, all hearing are held in the...