Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00324
Original file (ND02-00324.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-FN, USN
Docket No. ND02-00324

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020128, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020829. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-106 (formerly 3630650).

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues, as submitted

 1. Respectfully request an upgrade on my discharge. The type of discharge received was based on one isolated incident that does not reflect my character. I had served honorably from July of 1993 to January of 1998, receiving in that time the Good Conduct Medal, awarded on 11 July 1996, two letters of Appreciation while serving on the U.S.S. Samuel Gompers, and one letter of Appreciation while serving at Port Operations Subase Bangor. I received above average evals and had no disciplinary marks on my record. Since my discharge I have worked to achieve personal education goals made possible by the self respect and personal discipline taught to me during my active duty years. I have maintained a G.P.A. of 3.25 and Honor Roll statis since my enrollment in the Fall of 2000. I have worked to make myself a respected member of society. Thank you.
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Transcript from Tulsa Community College (3pgs)
Copy of Dean's Honor Roll Certificate
 Copy of President's Honor Certificate

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USN                        930925 - 970910  HON
          Inactive: USNR (DEP)     930519 - 930924  COG
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 970911               Date of Discharge: 980415

 Length of Service (years, months, days):
         Active: 00 07 04
          Inactive: None
Age at Entry: 24                          Years Contracted: 3

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 45

 Highest Rate: FN
Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NMF*                 Behavior: NMF             OTA: NMF
Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, SASM, SSDR, NAVY"E"RIBBON (2), MUC, GCA, Navy Pistol Marksmanship Ribbon (Sharpshooter)
Days of Unauthorized Absence: 70

*No Marks Found in the service record.

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-106 (formerly 3630650).

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

970911:  Reenlisted at Silverdale, WA for 3 years.
971202:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of homosexuality as evidenced by applicant's statement admitting to being a homosexual. Applicant advised, that if separation is approved, the characterization of service may be under other than honorable conditions.
971202:  Applicant advised of her rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
971205:  Commanding Officer recommended applicant be separated from the naval service with a honorable discharge by reason of homosexuality as evidenced by applicant's statement admitting her homosexuality.

980105:  BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge with characterization as type warranted by service record by reason of homosexual conduct admission.
980324:  Charges preferred to special court-martial for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 86: Did on or about 5 January 1998, without authority, absent herself from her unit, to wit: Transient Personnel Unit Great Lakes, Great Lakes, Illinois, and did remain so absent until on or about 17 March 1998.
980326:  A pplicant requested an administrative discharge under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial. She consulted with counsel and was fully advised of the implications of her request. The applicant stated she understood the elements of the offense with which she was charged, and admitted she was guilty of the charge preferred against her. Specifically, she admitted to violating UCMJ, Article 86: unauthorized absence from her unit from 5 January 1998 to 17 March 1998. The applicant stated she was completely satisfied with the counsel she had received. The applicant understood that if discharged under other than honorable conditions, it might deprive her of virtually all veterans' benefits based upon her current enlistment, and that she might expect to encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life in situations wherein the type of service rendered or the character of discharge received therefrom may have a bearing.

980330:  The Commanding Officer, exercising GCMCA, approved the request for an administrative separation in lieu of a trial by court-martial, and directed the applicant’s discharge.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 980415 under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).
Issue 1. The Board found that the applicant’s service prior to her desertion does not mitigate her misconduct sufficient to warrant an upgrade to her discharge. The applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects her service to her country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The applicant is reminded that she remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of her discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective
12 Dec 1997 until 10 July 2000, Article 1910-106 (formerly 3630650), SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL.

B. A punitive bad conduct discharge may be adjudged for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 86, unauthorized absence for a period more than 30 days, upon conviction by a Special or General Court-Martial, in accordance with the Manual for Courts-Martial.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

 E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls10.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                   Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                   Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00989

    Original file (ND03-00989.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00989 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030522. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The NDRB also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00880

    Original file (ND03-00880.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00880 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030422. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4) Letter from Special Assistant, Congressional Liaison Office, dated June 25, 2001 PART II...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00937

    Original file (ND99-00937.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00937 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990702, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions and the re-entry code changed from RE-4 to RE-1 or RE-2. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. After this took place, I had talked to my mother a few times to see how she and my brother were doing.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00538

    Original file (ND02-00538.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a result of this man's actions and the personal issues that already existed, I took it upon myself to resolve these problems and go home. No further information found in service record. 971002: Applicant to unauthorized absence 0550, 971002.Applicant declared a deserter.980131: Applicant from unauthorized absence 1215, 980131 (120 days/surrendered).980219: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial, authority:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00253

    Original file (ND01-00253.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00253 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001228, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to Honorable. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 980602: Applicant ordered to active duty.000124: Charges preferred to special court-martial for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 86: Unauthorized absence (UA) from 2230, 2Apr99 until 1400, 2Sep99 (152 days/surrendered).pplicant...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00336

    Original file (ND04-00336.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00544

    Original file (ND03-00544.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00544 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030213. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00361

    Original file (ND00-00361.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00361 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000202, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to General/under Honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Naval Council of Personnel Boards Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board 720...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00109

    Original file (ND01-00109.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00109 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001031, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. My letter of explanation is attached.” Concerning a change in reenlistment code, the NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reentry into the naval service or any other of the Armed Forces.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00600

    Original file (ND99-00600.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-106 (formerly 3630650). Letter from Commanding Officer, USS PETERSON (DD 969),received date MAR 27 1998. 980310: Applicant submits request for Administrative Discharge under Other Than Honorable conditions in Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial.