Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00062
Original file (ND02-00062.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-HA, USN
Docket No. ND02-00062

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 011002, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020604. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues

1. My discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident in 28 months of service with no other adverse action.
2. I worked with N.C.I.S. for 10 months, It was implied by Agent "B_" that by helping them (N.C.I.S.) I would be able to stay in the Navy.

Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
          Inactive: USNR (DEP)     961115 - 971102  COG
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 971103               Date of Discharge: 001107

 Length of Service (years, months, days):
         Active: 03 00 05
          Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4
Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 55

 Highest Rate: HN
Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.00 (2)    Behavior: 3.00 (2)                OTA: 3.17
Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: SSDR (2)
Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly 3630620.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

000217:  Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the applicant to have a substance use disorder.

000518:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A: Wrongful use of controlled substance on 15Dec99, to wit: marijuana.
         Award: Restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to HA. Restriction and extra duty for 15 days suspended for 6 months. No indication of appeal in the record.
001005:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by CO's NJP on 18May00 for violation of Article 112A, UCMJ, wrongful use of marijuana.
001005:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.
001005:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

001013:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

 001016:  Commander, 3d Force Service Support Group directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 001107 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).
Issue 1. The applicant states his discharge was based on one isolated incident in 28 months of service with no other infractions. The applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. The discharge was proper and equitable. Relief denied.
Issue 2. The applicant provided no documentation, nor did the Board find any evidence in the records available to support his allegation that work with the NCIS should mitigate his characterization of service. The applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required. Relief denied.





Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 27, effective 27 March 2000 - 11 Feb 2001, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls10.jag.af.mil ".

 The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023
 ______

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00548

    Original file (ND02-00548.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT -ex-GSMFR, USN Docket No. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 021206.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00104

    Original file (ND03-00104.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I was told if I elected admin board, I would not receive the board until after my 6 month cruise was over. Airman Apprentice (Applicant) denies use of marijuana and points to his use of various fitness supplements and an antibiotic as the possible causes for a positive urinalysis result. The summary of service clearly documents that drug abuse was the reason the Applicant was discharged.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00308

    Original file (ND00-00308.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION In response to the applicant’s second issue, the applicant has provided no documentation of good character and conduct for the Board to consider a recharacterization based on his post-service conduct, therefore relief is denied. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective 12 Dec 97 to 19 May 99, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01083

    Original file (ND00-01083.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-SA, USNR Docket No. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 990602 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00960

    Original file (ND04-00960.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00960 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040526. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20030402 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A).

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01161

    Original file (ND02-01161.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-01161 Applicant ’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020814, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 981208 - 990119 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00518

    Original file (ND00-00518.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-BM3, USN Docket No. The NDRB considered the applicant’s entire service record, time in service, stated family problems (from ADB) and found that the discharge was proper and equitable . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective 12 Dec 97 to 19 May 99, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct- Drug Abuse.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00421

    Original file (ND02-00421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. Documentation In addition to the service record (there was no discharge package available for review), the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 990830 - 990919 COG Active: None Period...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00435

    Original file (ND04-00435.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record review. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00936

    Original file (ND01-00936.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00936 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010712, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, the applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :991021: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article...