Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00041
Original file (ND02-00041.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-AR, USN
Docket No. ND02-00041

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010926, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020517. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

1. Please consider that I do not have a drug problem it was just to get out of the navy because my dad owns his own business, and needed help. Also I was having money problems and couldn't make enough in the navy. If you run a background check you will see for the last 7 months I have been a model citizen. Thank you for your time.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     000322 - 000423  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 000424               Date of Discharge: 010112

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 08 19
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 11                        AFQT: 74

 Highest Rate: AR

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NOB                           Behavior: 2.00 (1)                OTA: 2.00

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 28

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

001228:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence 0730, 21Nov00 to 1430, 19Dec00 (29 days), violation of UCMJ, Article 107: False official statement on 13Nov00, to wit: that he wrongfully used marijuana, violation of UCMJ, Article 112A: Admitted to wrongfully use of marijuana on 21Dec00; violation of UCMJ, Article 134: Possess alcoholic beverages while under the age of 21 on 10Nov00.
         Award: Forfeiture of $502.80 per month for 2 month(s), restriction and extra duty for 45 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
001228:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to drug abuse.
001228:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.
010103:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

010103:  Chief of Naval Education and Training directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 010112 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issue 1 states: “Please consider that I do not have a drug problem it was just to get out of the navy because my dad owns his own business, and needed help. Also I was having money problems and couldn't make enough in the navy. If you run a background check you will see for the last 7 months I have been a model citizen. Thank you for your time.” The record shows the applicant was discharged for his admitted drug abuse. Drug abuse, whether determined from a drug test of self-admittance, requires mandatory processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. The applicant failed to provide any documentation to support his issue such as drug test results and/or drug treatment counseling. The Board found the Other Than Honorable discharge accurately characterizes the applicant’s service. Relief is denied.

 Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for clemency, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide any of these documents. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 27, effective 27 March 2000 - 11 Feb 2001, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls10.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01091

    Original file (ND02-01091.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 961209 - 970811 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 970812 Date of Discharge: 010112 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 03 05 01 Inactive: None No indication of appeal in the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01269

    Original file (ND03-01269.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:“To Whom it may concern: I am requesting an upgrade in discharge, simply for the fact I want to attend college to become a doctor, and accelerate my life with a clean record. In determining whether a case merits a change based on post-service conduct, the NDRB considers the length of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00972

    Original file (ND00-00972.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Letter from applicant's mother dated January 5, 2000 (2 copies)Letter from applicant's deceased father's doctor dated March 14, 2000 (2 copies)Letter from Hospice re applicant discharge processing undated (2 copies) Hospice Caregiver education record (2 copies) Copy of applicant's father's certificate of death (2 copies) PART II - SUMMARY OF...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00465

    Original file (ND03-00465.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00465 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030130. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Once again I thank you and I hope to hear from you.Applicant) (Address deleted) (Home telephone number deleted)” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00273

    Original file (ND01-00273.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Character reference dated December 17, 2000 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 931105 - 940530 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 940601 Date of Discharge: 980530 Length of Service (years, months, days): Active: 04 00 00 Inactive: None Age at Entry:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00287

    Original file (ND01-00287.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    000315: COMCARGRU TWO authorized the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use) [Extracted from case file]. In the applicant’s issues 3 and 4, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls10.jag.af.mil ".The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01442

    Original file (ND03-01442.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. ” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 4) (2) Nine pages from Applicant’s service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: None Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00964

    Original file (ND04-00964.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00964 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040525. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00867

    Original file (ND02-00867.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    010322: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended retention. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).Responding to the Applicant’s first issue, the Board noted that the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01267

    Original file (ND03-01267.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. No indication of appeal in the record.000929: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of...