Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00894
Original file (MD02-00894.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PFC, USMC
Docket No. MD02-00894

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020626, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 030311. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.
ART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as submitted

1. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to upgrade my discharge. I had 7 years of great service to the Marine Corp. Everyone makes mistakes. Unfortunately I made a big one. I planned to make the Marine Corp my life. I got mixed up with the wrong crowd and made mistakes, which cost me. I was rehabilitated. I would like to say that I served my country under Honorable Conditions. Thank you for you time.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant 's DD Form 214
Letter to Applicant from Continental Airlines dated March 28, 2001
Letter from Houston Aviation Admission Council, undated
Department of Transportation - Federal Aviation Administration card issued March 10, 2001
Certificate of recognition dated May 24, 2000
Certificate of graduation dated February 23, 2001

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                890329 - 891113  COG
         Active: USMC              891114 - 941027  HON

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 941028               Date of Discharge: 970228

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 04 01
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 23                          Years Contracted: 3

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 65

 Highest Rank: Cpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.0 (6)                       Conduct: 3.9 (6)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Letter of Appreciation, NDSM, SSDR with 1*, SASM, JMU, Certificate of Commendation, GCM with 1*, NUC, KLM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

941028:  Applicant reenlisted for 3 years.

 960326:  NAVDRUGLAB, Great Lakes, IL, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 960318, tested positive for cocaine.

960327:  Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Cocaine possession and abuse, ashore off duty. Consentual urinalysis 960312. Commanding Officer recommended Level II treatment. Comments: Block 15 was marked not determined on initial report. SNM has had initial evaluation with Drug and Alcohol Program Advisor, results have not been determined at this time. SNM will receive nonjudicial punishment and receive federally mandated treatment prior to discharge IAW MSG # R170305Z Oct 95, R092030Z Feb 95, SNM will be processed for discharge IAW ForO 5300.1, SECNAVINST 5300.28B, MCO 5300.12. SNM was identified as a positive Cocaine user on a consent urinalysis 13 March 1996 MSG #R260809Z MAR 96, Local Batch #6046, Lab Acc. # 316911, Spec. No. 01, tested at Navy Drug Lab, Great Lakes, IL.

 960328:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a:
 Specification: Possess a controlled substance as confirmed by NAVDRUGLAB Great Lakes message 260809Z Mar 96, to wit: cocaine.
Violation of UCMJ, Article 92:
Specification: Failed to comply with TAD orders to report to Millington, TN on 0730, 960314.
Awarded forfeiture of $500.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duties for 45 days, reduction to LCpl. Forfeiture for 2 months suspended for 6 months. Not appealed.
961211:  NAVDRUGLAB, Great Lakes, IL, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 961122, tested positive for cocaine.

 961214:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a:
 Specification: Use a controlled substance as confirmed by NAVDRUGLAB Great Lakes, IL message 110831Z Dec 96, to wit: cocaine.
Violation of UCMJ, Article 134:
Specification: Unfit for duty with a BAC of .138.
Violation of UCMJ, Article 86:
Specification: Unauthorized absence 0730-0930, 961214.
Awarded forfeiture of $490.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duties for 45 days, reduction to PFC. Not appealed.
970103:  Counseled regarding deficiencies, specifically, the illegal drug involvement. Usage of a controlled substance, identified in a consent urinalysis conducted on 13 March 1996, and confirmed by NAVDRUGLAB Great Lakes, IL, MSG R260809Z Mar96. Local Batch No 6046, Lab Acc. No 316911 Spec No 01, tested positive by IA and confirmed by GC/MS for (Cocaine) drug use. Also on 14 March 1996, 0730 on this date Applicant failed to comply with TAD orders to report to Millington, TN. Applicant advised that processing for administrative separation for misconduct is mandatory per MCO P1900.16.
970103:  Medical evaluation for alcohol dependency and drug abuse found the Applicant to be alcohol dependent and a drug abuser. Not eligible for treatment since Applicant had completed Level III rehabilitation within the last 12 months.
970207:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
970207:  Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

970207:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was drug abuse (cocaine) as evidenced by NAVDRUGLAB Great Lakes message 260809Z Mar 96 and NAVDRUGLAB Great Lakes message 110831Z Dec 96.

970225:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

970225:  GCMCA [Commander, Marine Forces Reserve] directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 970228 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issue 1. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. Relief denied.
The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle, are examples of verifiable documentation that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The Applicant’s evidence of post-service conduct was found not to mitigate the offense for which he was discharged. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 31 Jan 97 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01107

    Original file (ND02-01107.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, the President, Naval Discharge Review Board, directed a document review that was conducted on 030602 before a five-member board. Attempted to observe Applicant one more time to allow him to comply with the CO's order after still refusing to provide a sample, the CO ordered that Applicant be escorted to medical for a blood sample to be taken. In the Applicant’s case, the Board found that the urine sample that determined the Applicant used cocaine and marijuana was collected as...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00261

    Original file (MD04-00261.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :920723: Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01016

    Original file (ND02-01016.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Due to his poor military performance and continued drug and alcohol abuse FR (Applicant) has no potential for future naval service.900427: Drug and Alcohol Screening: Applicant is psychologically drug/alcohol dependent and recommended for separation and VA treatment for dependence. 900522: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct, drug abuse, and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00015

    Original file (ND01-00015.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    861219: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by your nonjudicial punishment fro attempting to smoke marijuana and for the wrongful use of cocaine.861219: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00972

    Original file (ND00-00972.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Letter from applicant's mother dated January 5, 2000 (2 copies)Letter from applicant's deceased father's doctor dated March 14, 2000 (2 copies)Letter from Hospice re applicant discharge processing undated (2 copies) Hospice Caregiver education record (2 copies) Copy of applicant's father's certificate of death (2 copies) PART II - SUMMARY OF...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00678

    Original file (ND01-00678.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00678 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010417, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 001103, in absentia, under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). Relief is denied.The applicant’s second issue states: “(Equity Issue)...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00810

    Original file (MD03-00810.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. A_ D_ H_ (Applicant).” Per enclosure (7), PFC H_’s (Applicant) specimen tested positive for marijuana.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00206

    Original file (MD03-00206.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Before entering the Marine Corps I had never used any drugs, and since that time I haven’t used any drugs. I want to thank you for taking the time to review my request, and if you have any more questions, you are free to ask.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00770

    Original file (ND01-00770.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-FR, USN Docket No. ND01-00770 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010516, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01175

    Original file (ND01-01175.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 and duplicate Admin Discharge Package (12 pages) and duplicate Copies of Medical Record (8 pages) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 951214 - 960129 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 960130 Date of Discharge: 960812 Length of...