Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00893
Original file (MD02-00893.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD02-00893

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020607, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant designated the American Legion as his representative on the DD Form 293.


Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 030410. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as submitted

1. (Equity Issue) His violation of the UCMJ notwithstanding, this former member opines that his overall service record is sufficient to warrant release under honorable conditions.

 2. (Equity Issue) This former member further requests that the Board include provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of this application.
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                961029 - 961126  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 961127               Date of Discharge: 000209

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 02 13 (Does not exclude lost time)
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: GED                       AFQT: 50

 Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 3.91 (9)             Conduct: 3.85 (9)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Rifle Expert Badge, NATO Medal, AFSM (w/1*),
AFEM, JMA, SSDR (w/1*), CoA

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

971001:  Eligible but not recommended for promotion to LCpl for month of Aug-Oct 97 due to failure of the semi-annual PFT and poor overall performance.
981130:  Eligible but not recommended for promotion to Cpl for 1 st quarter 1999 due to lack of initiative and need for supervision.
990319:  Eligible but not recommended for promotion to Cpl for 2 nd quarter 1999 due to lack of initiative and constant supervision needed.
990505:  Counseled regarding deficiencies, specifically, lack of professional knowledge, initiative, and the need for constant supervision. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance identified, and disciplinary and administrative discharge warnings issued.
990610:  Eligible but not recommended for promotion to Cpl for Jul 99 due to lack of professional knowledge.
990711:  Eligible but not recommended for promotion to Cpl for month of Aug 99 because of needing constant supervision.
990813:  Eligible but not recommended for promotion to Cpl for month of Sep 99 because of substandard MOS proficiency.

990825:  Counseled regarding deficiencies, specifically, lack of professional knowledge, initiative, and the need for constant supervision. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance identified, and disciplinary and administrative discharge warnings issued.
990909:  Eligible but not recommended for promotion to Cpl for 4 th quarter 99 because of substandard MOS knowledge.

990922:  NAVDRUGLAB Jacksonville, FL reported applicant’s urine sample, tested positive for LSD. (Extracted from counseling entry dtd 991001.)
991001:  Counseled regarding deficiencies, specifically, illegal drug involvement, Lysergic acid Diethylamide (LSD) usage identified through urinalysis confirmed by Navy Drug Lab Jacksonville, FL msg 221633Z SEP 99. Necessary corrective actions explained.

991014:  Summary Court-Martial.
         Charge I: violation of UCMJ Article 112a: Specification: Did, at an unknown place, on or about 990824, and on or about 990907, wrongfully use LSD.
         Findings: to Charge I and specification 1 thereunder, guilty.
         Sentence: Forfeiture of $639.00 pay per month for 1 month, confinement 29 days in the brig, reduction to E-1.
         CA 991014: Sentence approved and ordered executed. The Base Brig, Camp Lejeune, NC, is designated as the place of confinement.

991014:  To confinement as part of sentence of SCM.

991018:  Clinical Psychologist, ATF, Camp Lejeune: Applicant was evaluated and substance abuse/dependence was not found. Isolated incident, no treat-ment indicated at this time. Applicant was found psychologically fit for full duty and returned to same. Psychologist recommend Applicant be processed for administrative separation per MCO P1900.16.

991115:  Released from confinement and transferred to CO, 2d Marine Regiment for duty.

000124:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

000124:  GCMCA (Commanding General, 2d Marine Division, Camp Lejeune, NC) directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 000209 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1: The Applicant contends, through counsel, that his overall service record is sufficient to warrant a recharacterization of his service to honorable. With regard to separation, drug abuse (use) warrants a characterization of service normally under other than honorable conditions. A characterization of honorable or general (under honorable conditions) is not authorized unless a Marine's record is otherwise so meritorious that an other than honorable characterization clearly would be inappropriate. The records the Board reviewed showed there were no mitigating or extenuating factors or any entries so meritorious as to warrant an upgrade of the Applicant's discharge. Further, the Board found that the Applicant had two derogatory Page 11 counselings, seven non-recommenda-tions for promotion, and the summary court-martial for drug use. Relief on this basis is therefore denied.

Issue 2: The Applicant contends, through counsel, that the Board assess his post-service conduct to determine if an upgrade to his characterization of service is warranted. T he Applicant, however, has provided no post-service documentation for the Board to consider. Relief at this time is denied.

The following is provided for the edification of the Applicant. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge even though there is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant's performance and conduct during the period of service under review may be considered. Verifiable proof of post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities, and credible evidence of a substance-free lifestyle are examples of documents that may be provided to the Board to receive consideration of relief based on post-service conduct.



The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 31 Jan 97 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.


PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00695

    Original file (MD01-00695.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00695 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010420, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Recommended loss of 5 pounds per month and a total of 30 pounds within 180 days.990615: Counseling: Applicant assigned to the Weight Control Program to correct deficiency of not meeting height/weight standards. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00121

    Original file (MD02-00121.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00121 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 011017, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. L_, Capt, USMC, undated Separation Authority (CG, 3d MAW) dtd 1 May 00Special Court-Martial proceedings (18 pages) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 950920 - 960421 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 960422...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00017

    Original file (MD03-00017.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00017 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20021001, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. 990924: Credentialed Health Care Provider, NavHosp, Camp Lejeune, medical eval: Current HT – 70 inches, WT – 231 pounds, Body Fat – 27%. Advised of being overweight and in excess of allowable body fat standard.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00605

    Original file (MD02-00605.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    An honorable discharge is required to pursue this career and be a productive citizen.I thank you in advance for your consideration in this matter.Sincerely, Documentation In addition to the service record (there was no discharge package available), the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214Copy of article from newspaper Medical records (9 pages)Record of proficiency and conduct markings dated 10/06/99 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00676

    Original file (MD03-00676.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00676 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030305. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. AXIS III: Pregnancy (Approximately 30 weeks).

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00234

    Original file (MD01-00234.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I knew and tried to explain to my unit that if I was transferred I would never get to see my son again. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Circuit Court, Fifth Judicial Circuit, Lake County, Florida Final Judgment dtd 20 Jul 2000 Visitation ScheduleCopy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501090

    Original file (MD0501090.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:“I am requesting both an upgrade of discharge as well as a return of my original rank of Sgt which was taken in an NJP prior to my separation from the Corps. Thank you for your time and should anything else be needed of me please do not hesitate to request it.” Documentation In addition to the service and medical records, the following additional documentation, submitted by the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00694

    Original file (ND03-00694.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00694 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030314. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 960720 - 961121 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 961122 Date of Discharge: 991119 Length of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00187

    Original file (ND04-00187.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Civilian authorities apprehended ABFAA H___ for desertion and returned him to USS ENTERPRISE (CVN-65) on 7 April 2000, 73 days after his report no later than date. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00785

    Original file (MD03-00785.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00785 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030331. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 960313 - 960722 COG...